That's nice and all guys but that has nothing to do with the question. Are you literally trying to make the argument "Let's confirm him because someone else can do the heavy lifting!"? This is a pretty serious position and losing Sam Spade is a fairly significant blow to the verbosity of the court. This thread isn't about Ebowed, it's about Oakvale.
I swear sometimes I'm the only one that actually considers confirmation hearings as a chance to actually ask questions. You can lay down the sugary sweet praise later. (Sheesh, when I wanted to be on the Court I had to fill out a huge
form sent to me from Lief, who was President at the time.)
I just have some questions about some important or controversial court cases, wanting to know your opinion of the conclusion and so on:
Atlasia v. SoutheastUNEPSE v. Northeast RegionSPC v. AtlasiaPeter v. AtlasiaI'd also like to know your opinion on having a strict "standing" requirement to sue over certain laws. Sam Spade was a big proponent of such a thing, but it was eventually discarded after Opebo and I ruled it was a silly extra hoop to jump through. What are your thoughts?