ADOF 1968 Scenario: Kennedy/Yarborough vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 07:49:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  ADOF 1968 Scenario: Kennedy/Yarborough vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ADOF 1968 Scenario: Kennedy/Yarborough vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay  (Read 2189 times)
MRX
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 28, 2011, 04:03:36 PM »
« edited: July 28, 2011, 04:19:47 PM by MRX »

Now, for an election scenario based on the alternate history novel: A Disturbance of Fate. If any of you haven't read it, I'll give u a brief overview. RFK doesn't killed on June 4, 1968 (Sirhan does, fortunately) and manages to get the Democratic nomination for President. His running mate is Texas Senator Ralph Yarborough. What would a realistic 1968 Election Map look like for these candidates? BTW, I'll be doing a map based on the results given in the book as soon as I can master the map making tool.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2011, 04:07:57 PM »

Why do both Wallace and Nixon have Agnew for VP? Did you mean to put LeMay?
Logged
MRX
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2011, 04:19:25 PM »

Yeah I did. My bad. Fixed it immediately.
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2011, 08:08:35 AM »


RFK/Yarborough (D): 279 EVs
Nixon/Agnew (R): 214 EVs
Wallace/LeMay (AI): 45 EVs
Logged
MRX
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2011, 03:00:08 PM »

I'll have a map like hcallega's posted soon. Still need help creating an election map.
Logged
MRX
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2011, 03:25:44 PM »
« Edited: August 09, 2011, 03:30:36 PM by MRX »

Here's my election map for ADOF 1968:



Kennedy/Yarborough (D): 341 EVs
Nixon/Agnew (R): 152 EVs
Wallace/LeMay (AI): 45 EVs
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2011, 05:22:48 PM »

No way Tennssee goes to a Kennedy. Also I doubt that Vermont or Maine would. Those were both very WASPY and "conservative" in the traditional sense.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2011, 09:06:35 PM »

No way Tennssee goes to a Kennedy. Also I doubt that Vermont or Maine would. Those were both very WASPY and "conservative" in the traditional sense.

Yeah. Funny thing with New England is back in the day, out of the three formerly solidly Republican state of New England (ME, NH, and VT), New Hampshire was actually the most likely of the three to go Democratic (1912, 1916, 1936, 1940, 1944) and now it's the most likely of the three to go Republican.
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2011, 04:57:34 PM »



Kennedy-245
Nixon-240
Wallace-53
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2011, 06:45:30 PM »

No way Tennssee goes to a Kennedy. Also I doubt that Vermont or Maine would. Those were both very WASPY and "conservative" in the traditional sense.

Yeah. Funny thing with New England is back in the day, out of the three formerly solidly Republican state of New England (ME, NH, and VT), New Hampshire was actually the most likely of the three to go Democratic (1912, 1916, 1936, 1940, 1944) and now it's the most likely of the three to go Republican.

Yeah. Vermont is a Democratic solid now (at least in the presidency), pretty much on par with DC. Maine is a safe Dem state. New Hampshire is a swing state. Weird how things like that happen.
Logged
MRX
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2011, 06:49:15 PM »

No way Tennssee goes to a Kennedy. Also I doubt that Vermont or Maine would. Those were both very WASPY and "conservative" in the traditional sense.

I know. These results are based on the author's predictions of how RFK would win the '68 Election. In addition to writing the book, he has written an essay on RFK winning the primaries, which is more realistic in discription than what the author states in the actual book. If anybody hasn't read the book yet, pick up a copy. Apart from some events and characteristics that are very ASB, it's a pretty good book.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.