Were past VP choices net positives or net negatives for the ticket? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:51:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Were past VP choices net positives or net negatives for the ticket? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were past VP choices net positives or net negatives for the ticket?  (Read 3589 times)
"'Oeps!' De blunders van Rick Perry Indicted"
DarthNader
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 483


« on: July 31, 2011, 11:35:16 AM »

'08 - Palin -, Biden mild +
'04 - Cheney mild -, Edwards mild +
'00 - Cheney mild +, Lieberman mixed (helped in Fla., probably hurt elsewhere)
'96 - Gore mild +, Kemp neither
'92 - Gore big +, Quayle -, Stockdale very mild - (would've hurt more if Perot had a chance of winning)
'88 - Bentson +, Quayle -
'84 - Bush neither, Ferraro mixed
'80 - Bush & Mondale both +, where's Pat Lucey? (Anderson's running mate)
'76 - Mondale +, Dole - (probably helped in some farm states though)
'72 - Agnew mixed, Eagleton major -, Shriver mild +
'68 - Muskie +, Agnew -, LeMay -, I suppose
'64 - Humphrey +, Miller neither
'60 - Johnson big +, Lodge neither (that I can see)
'56 - Nixon mild +, Kefauver not sure
52 - Nixon mixed to +, Sparkman not sure
48 - Barkley +, Warren neither
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.