Looks like there is a deal. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:25:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Looks like there is a deal. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Looks like there is a deal.  (Read 8266 times)
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


« on: July 31, 2011, 08:00:59 PM »

The Devil is in the details, people. I'll withhold judgement until some actual legislation is released. I don't even know if they'll have time to have the CBO score it before they pass it.
Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2011, 09:10:06 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2011, 11:14:32 PM »

It's actually a pretty interesting deal in outline.

Does anybody have any information about what the first $1 trillion in cuts will involve, beyond the military bases?  NPR story identifies cuts to the National Parks Service, the Labor Department, Housing and Urban Development, and a "hundred" other discretionary programs.

I think the appropriations process will determine what exactly gets cut. They just have to stay under the caps in the legislation. If they don't, then across-the-board sequestration will spread the pain evenly.

Also, the DoD's Base budget doesn't mean 'military bases' (although that's included). It is the total sum of the sub-budgets of 'Military Personnel', 'Procurement', 'Operations and Maintenance', etc.



Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2011, 11:31:37 AM »

Mike Lee said he's going to filibuster and Pelosi is still reportedly undecided.
Logged
Marston
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 446
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2011, 10:11:31 PM »

Stop with the drama. The Act preserves the massive increases in discretionary spending from the last 2-3 years and is, relatively speaking, inconsequential budgetary-wise for the short-term.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.