Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 30, 2014, 06:48:52 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  How many probable Presidents declined to run?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: How many probable Presidents declined to run?  (Read 3123 times)
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1429


View Profile
« on: August 01, 2011, 01:45:06 am »
Ignore

Plenty of candidates decline to run because their chances weren't great. But how many were genuinely popular enough that their decision not to run could be construed as genuinely being uninterested in the Presidency? I'm thinking of General William Sherman, the originator of the Shermanesque statement, of which this might be true.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2011, 08:05:52 pm by Nichlemn »Logged

NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1753
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2011, 03:03:49 am »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo and Colin Powell are two that I can think off right away.
Logged




Bernie would probably win Vermont if Obama were deemed to have more than 272 evs in the vag.
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1429


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2011, 04:18:05 am »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo and Colin Powell are two that I can think off right away.

At least in 1992, Cuomo's decision not to run probably stemmed from Bush's seeming invulnerability. IIRC Powell was spooked by the possibly Bradley effect. I'm thinking of someone like Eisenhower if he had declined his draft.
Logged

wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8428
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2011, 08:32:20 am »
Ignore

RFK (in 1964)

Calvin Coolidge (in 1928 and possibly 1932)

Eisenhower (in 1948)

Any Democrats who would've had a better shot at nomination than Woodrow Wilson or Franklin Roosevelt in 1912 or 1932

Any Republican who would've had a better shot at nomination than McKinley in 1896

Any Republican who would've had a better shot at the nomination for Vice-President than Roosevelt in 1900
Logged
Username MechaRFK
RFK
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1275
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2011, 05:58:57 pm »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo and Colin Powell are two that I can think off right away.


Logged



 
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15226
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2011, 09:23:04 pm »
Ignore

Well, the Kingfish was shot before he could run....
Logged


NCeriale
Full Member
***
Posts: 150


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2011, 12:38:35 am »
Ignore

Ted Kennedy in '88
Colin Powell in '96 or '00 (or both, you know how the Republican party works)
Joe Biden in '04 MAYBE
Christie in 2012
Logged
Long titles annoy me
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5956
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2011, 01:46:25 pm »
Ignore

RFK (in 1964)

Calvin Coolidge (in 1928 and possibly 1932)

Eisenhower (in 1948)

Any Democrats who would've had a better shot at nomination than Woodrow Wilson or Franklin Roosevelt in 1912 or 1932

Any Republican who would've had a better shot at nomination than McKinley in 1896

Any Republican who would've had a better shot at the nomination for Vice-President than Roosevelt in 1900
Of course, my theory is that Coolidge knew the Great Depression was going to happen, so he chose not to run so they wouldn't blame him.


Anyway, I echo the Powel statements. He would have done very well against both Clinton and Gore.
Logged

I imagine hyphenation, for both spouses, as a sort of custom would very quickly make us all sound like a bunch of bizarrely named English aristocrats. If Peter Flynn marries Beatrice Mendez and has a kid named Anthony, who in turn marries Alice Glazowski-Chanut, their kid would be named Colin Mendez-Flynn-Glazowski-Chanut, who would then marry Beth Harper-Zhang-Rothman-Wald, and their kid would be named...
cavalcade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 746


Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -3.13

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2011, 02:43:21 pm »
Ignore

Are we talking about people who NEVER ran for President, or people who chose not to run for President at a time when they had a good chance of winning (whether or not they ran another time)?

If the latter, there are probably a ton...Clinton 2004 would be the most recent, with the possible exception of Huckabee 2012.

If the former, yeah, Powell & Cuomo.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12975


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2011, 09:54:03 pm »
Ignore

Qualified D's in 92.

Qualified R's in 80.
Logged

Long titles annoy me
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5956
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2011, 10:04:45 pm »
Ignore

Qualified D's in 92.

Qualified R's in 80.

I think Ford could have pulled a Cleveland if Reagan decided not to run for some reason.
Logged

I imagine hyphenation, for both spouses, as a sort of custom would very quickly make us all sound like a bunch of bizarrely named English aristocrats. If Peter Flynn marries Beatrice Mendez and has a kid named Anthony, who in turn marries Alice Glazowski-Chanut, their kid would be named Colin Mendez-Flynn-Glazowski-Chanut, who would then marry Beth Harper-Zhang-Rothman-Wald, and their kid would be named...
Guderian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 576


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2011, 01:20:46 pm »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo would have lost in 1992.
Logged
"'Oeps!' De blunders van Rick Perry Indicted"
DarthNader
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 392


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2011, 01:56:18 pm »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo would have lost in 1992.

Maybe in the primaries.
Logged
"'Oeps!' De blunders van Rick Perry Indicted"
DarthNader
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 392


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2011, 02:00:15 pm »
Ignore

Gore in 2008; Ted Kennedy in '68 (draft effort at the convention) or '76.
Logged
"'Oeps!' De blunders van Rick Perry Indicted"
DarthNader
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 392


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2011, 02:02:04 pm »
Ignore

At least in 1992, Cuomo's decision not to run probably stemmed from Bush's seeming invulnerability.

Cuomo decided later than everyone else (Dec. 1991) after Bush's numbers had started to decline seriously.
Logged
Guderian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 576


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2011, 11:23:00 am »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo would have lost in 1992.

Maybe in the primaries.

Nah, he'd win the primaries easily but his general election bid would have been Dukakis II. Bush would have swept the South and Perot would never be a major factor.
Logged
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58778
India


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2011, 06:16:42 am »
Ignore

All of them lately, which is why you've ended up with this amazing (if underwhelming) list of quite improbable Presidents beginning with Evil Dick.
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3833
View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2011, 06:57:53 pm »
Ignore

General Petraeus would have won quite easily against Obama if he had decided to run for 2012. He would of course had to have gotten through the primary though.
Logged
RodPresident
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 854
Brazil


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2011, 09:08:12 pm »
Ignore

Howard Baker'88,  Mark Warner 2008, WJB 1912, MacArthur in 1948, Inouye in 88, John Danforth in 96.
Logged


10 years without Brizola
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7233
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 27, 2011, 02:52:51 pm »
Ignore

Mario Cuomo would have lost in 1992.

Maybe in the primaries.

Nah, he'd win the primaries easily but his general election bid would have been Dukakis II. Bush would have swept the South and Perot would never be a major factor.

Bush would sweep the south...maybe, Arkansas and Tennessee were already shifting to the democrats. But, obviously, Cuomo would be a weaker candidate for the south than Clinton was in real life. However, Cuomo would be stronger than Clinton in swing states in the industrial north. Cuomo could carry New Hampshire, Maine, and New Jersey rather easily.

Here also, it might be smart for Bush to drop Quayle and pick Dick Cheney. Cheney was in his prime back then and there was always a question about Quayle. GWB recommended to his father, nrl, for him to drop Quayle for Cheney. Bush obviously said no. You know, it might come down to who Cuomo picks as his running mate. If Cuomo picks a southerner (probably a smart decision for him), then Bush might keep Quayle. However, if Cuomo picks someone from the industrial north, then Bush might consider Cheney.

But no, from the outset, Cuomo is not Dukakis II. A strong Bush campaign could turn him into that eventually. But, Cuomo is a strong candidate with an attractive, outspoken, supportive wife. And Bush could win, but Cuomo would give him the race of his life probably.
Logged

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=195483.new#new
the birth of modern america & onward election Frederick Douglas becomes the 1st African American president of the united states when he wins election to the office in 1892 only 30 years after the height of slavery in the United States. He narrowly wins reelection in 1896 against William Jennings Bryan. Douglas runs again in 1900 and even indicated his interest in a 4th run in 1904 but Grover Cleveland wins the 1900 election.
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31727


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2011, 05:49:17 pm »
Ignore

Calvin Coolidge (in 1928 and possibly 1932)

No way for 1932. Even if he magically won the 1932 election, there's that little problem of him not living until inauguration day in 1933.
Logged
I Am Feeblepizza.
ALF
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 350
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2011, 08:13:54 pm »
Ignore

Mitch Daniels and Chris Christie, 2012
Logged
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37072


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2011, 07:43:52 pm »
Ignore

Reubin Askew in 1976.
Logged
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6523
United States
View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2011, 08:47:12 pm »
Ignore

Colin Powell in 2000.
Logged

Goodbye
Peter the Lefty
Peternerdman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3439
United States


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2012, 06:54:43 am »
Ignore

Colin Powell in 2000.
Mario Cuomo...a lot of times. 
Al Gore in 2004. 
Bernie Sanders (primary challenge) in 2012. 
Russ Feingold in 2012 (same reason). 
Chris Christie in 2012 (never say never, unfortunately). 
Jim DeMint in 2012. 
Logged



-7.61 Economic
-7.48 Social
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines