Gabu won the final round tie because he had more first preference votes.
That's what I don't like, if I could quote some parts of a message from WMS on this:
I actually agree on this.
In strict constitutional tradition and to limit the power of democracy, I believe that tied races in the Senate should be decided by the regional governors, tied races in the governorship and other smaller regionwide offices should be decided by the senior senator from that region and tied races in the Presidency should be decided by vote of the Senate, with the tiebreaking vote (if necessary) coming from the outgoing (or incoming) VP.
WE DON'T HAVE REGIONAL SENATORS!
*ahem*
However, you'd like the MW constitution because our 3rd tiebreak (after 1st prefs and an instant runoff between only the tied candidates) is a panel of Senators of states representing the Midwest
Thank you Governor I was just about to say that. Many Districts overlap into several regions, D5 is the most obvious example of this. WE DO NOT HAVE REGIONAL SENATORS thus a governor deciding the winner is not acceptable.
Ok, I didn't understand that. I am still a little new here.
I would still prefer a election system which takes a certain amount power away from the unwashed masses or the majority (like myself at the point) in a very close election. I do have no problem with preferential voting, however; I just like some limits on democracy.
Gov. I-Like's system should be used at the first level, not at the third, imo, though it is a good idea.