Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 02:37:14 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Alternative Elections (Moderators: Bacon King, Dallasfan65)
| | | |-+  Romney/Rubio vs. Obama/Biden vs. Sanders/Chafee
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Romney/Rubio vs. Obama/Biden vs. Sanders/Chafee  (Read 900 times)
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3833
View Profile
« on: August 05, 2011, 05:32:18 am »
Ignore

Let's say rather than Progressives attempting to organize a primary challenge to Obama, Bernie Sanders decides to establish and run as an Independent Progressive. He chooses as his running mate Lincoln Chafee. Let's assume that with the instability in financial markets, a double dip occurs, and unemployment is at about 10.5% by November 2012, after falling from a peak of 11% in early 2012. Who wins in such a scenario?



My guess would be something similar to this. Romney wins in an electoral landslide, but not as comfortably in the popular vote because the populist rhetoric of Sanders wins over some Conservative-leaning voters in the Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Sanders wins Vermont, Minnesota, and Rhode Island's electoral votes, and nearly wins in Wisconsin, Washington, and Iowa. The only state Obama only wins above 50% is Hawaii. The Democrats receive their lowest percentage of the vote ever in the District of Columbia because of Sanders. Oregon, Maine, Washington, Wisconsin, and New Jersey are won by Romney do to vote splitting between Obama and Sanders. Obama is pushed into third place in Vermont, Arkansas, Oregon, Utah, Iowa, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, West Virginia, Minnesota, Maine, and Alaska. Romney also does extremely well in the Rocky Mountain and Great Plains regions of the country, and does slightly better than McCain in the South.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2011, 06:29:55 am by SayNotoJonHuntsman »Logged
NHI
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3224


P
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2011, 07:27:42 am »
Ignore

Romney, unlikely but a landslide worthy of Reagan.



Romney: 436
Obama:    85
Sanders:  17
Logged

‎"Our president thinks this country's in decline. It is if he's president. It's not if I'm president." -- Mitt Romney

CultureKing
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3218
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2011, 05:10:33 pm »
Ignore

I feel that Sanders would fail to get too much traction:



Which would result in:
Romney: 373 49.4%
Obama: 165 42.4%
Sanders: 0 7.2%
Others: 0 1%

In other words Sanders fatally wounds an already weak Obama. Although with this scenario Obama would lose anyways just by a slightly closer electoral vote (throw in NJ, MN and NM into his column)
Logged

Econ: -6.50, Social: -5.23
justW353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1781
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -2.09

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2011, 02:59:37 am »
Ignore

Without Sanders:


With Sanders:

Logged

So a lack of knowledge means I'm not welcome here? I've always wondered why there's a lack of Republicans on this forum and now I'm beginning to see why.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines