Romney/Rubio vs. Obama/Biden vs. Sanders/Chafee
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 08:04:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  Romney/Rubio vs. Obama/Biden vs. Sanders/Chafee
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney/Rubio vs. Obama/Biden vs. Sanders/Chafee  (Read 2077 times)
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 05, 2011, 05:32:18 AM »
« edited: August 05, 2011, 06:29:55 AM by SayNotoJonHuntsman »

Let's say rather than Progressives attempting to organize a primary challenge to Obama, Bernie Sanders decides to establish and run as an Independent Progressive. He chooses as his running mate Lincoln Chafee. Let's assume that with the instability in financial markets, a double dip occurs, and unemployment is at about 10.5% by November 2012, after falling from a peak of 11% in early 2012. Who wins in such a scenario?



My guess would be something similar to this. Romney wins in an electoral landslide, but not as comfortably in the popular vote because the populist rhetoric of Sanders wins over some Conservative-leaning voters in the Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Sanders wins Vermont, Minnesota, and Rhode Island's electoral votes, and nearly wins in Wisconsin, Washington, and Iowa. The only state Obama only wins above 50% is Hawaii. The Democrats receive their lowest percentage of the vote ever in the District of Columbia because of Sanders. Oregon, Maine, Washington, Wisconsin, and New Jersey are won by Romney do to vote splitting between Obama and Sanders. Obama is pushed into third place in Vermont, Arkansas, Oregon, Utah, Iowa, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, West Virginia, Minnesota, Maine, and Alaska. Romney also does extremely well in the Rocky Mountain and Great Plains regions of the country, and does slightly better than McCain in the South.
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2011, 07:27:42 AM »

Romney, unlikely but a landslide worthy of Reagan.



Romney: 436
Obama:    85
Sanders:  17
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2011, 05:10:33 PM »

I feel that Sanders would fail to get too much traction:



Which would result in:
Romney: 373 49.4%
Obama: 165 42.4%
Sanders: 0 7.2%
Others: 0 1%

In other words Sanders fatally wounds an already weak Obama. Although with this scenario Obama would lose anyways just by a slightly closer electoral vote (throw in NJ, MN and NM into his column)
Logged
justW353
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,693
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2011, 02:59:37 AM »

Without Sanders:


With Sanders:

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.