Does the Downgrade end Obama's reelection chances?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:00:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Does the Downgrade end Obama's reelection chances?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Does the Downgrade end Obama's reelection chances?  (Read 4167 times)
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 06, 2011, 07:10:38 AM »

Thoughts?

Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2011, 07:16:36 AM »
« Edited: August 06, 2011, 07:20:04 AM by Revivalism Revivalist »

If it does anything (and it doesn't seem like it will), it helps his reelection chances as the stated justification for the downgrade was entirely the intransigence of the Republican Party and nothing to do with Obama. But it won't have much, if any, impact.

They basically came out and said that tax increases were necessary, after all.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2011, 08:02:45 AM »

I don't think it has much effect - but I agree with Verily here, the S&P downgrade is because of the impact of the ridiculous GOP demands which made no economic sense.
Logged
Paul Kemp
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,230
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2011, 08:10:30 AM »

You're overestimating the public's memory.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2011, 09:22:07 AM »

The downgrade itself no.  The potential effects of it increase his chances of winning a landslide while having 10% approval.  But hopefully it will have no effect but ending S&P's credibility.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2011, 09:25:26 AM »

The downgrade itself no.  The potential effects of it increase his chances of winning a landslide while having 10% approval.  But hopefully it will have no effect but ending S&P's credibility.
Why would it end S&P's credibility?  A cut in America's credit rating was long overdue.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2011, 11:37:46 AM »

It doesn't end his chances, because everybody knows it's mostly the Republicans' fault.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2011, 11:46:08 AM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2011, 11:47:48 AM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2011, 11:48:32 AM »

The downgrade itself no.  The potential effects of it increase his chances of winning a landslide while having 10% approval.  But hopefully it will have no effect but ending S&P's credibility.
If anything, it was inevitable if S&P hopes to retain any credibility.

I don't think it has much effect - but I agree with Verily here, the S&P downgrade is because of the impact of the ridiculous GOP demands which made no economic sense.
No, because the President gave in to ridiculous demands. Let's not forget that.


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
I've caught myself thinking it may be costing the entire world very, very dearly that the 2010 US Presidential Election was held two years too soon.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2011, 11:49:14 AM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 06, 2011, 11:55:49 AM »
« Edited: August 06, 2011, 11:58:23 AM by Jacobtm »

Totally depends how they play it. Each side will blame the other.

Raising the debt ceiling was never an issue in the past, Republicans made it an issue this time and demanded unreasonable spending cuts during a time when we need more stimulus to help the economy recover.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 06, 2011, 12:31:36 PM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.

It was Obama's strong support that passed the stimulus.  It increased debt, and had virtually no long term positive effect on the economy.  The Democrats had two years to look at method to reduce debt, and increase revenue; they did nothing, except increase spending and ultimately, this year, blocking revenue increases.

This was probably a strategic mistake for which the Democrats may be paying for for the next 30 years.

Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 06, 2011, 12:46:53 PM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.

It was Obama's strong support that passed the stimulus.  It increased debt, and had virtually no long term positive effect on the economy.  The Democrats had two years to look at method to reduce debt, and increase revenue; they did nothing, except increase spending and ultimately, this year, blocking revenue increases.

This was probably a strategic mistake for which the Democrats may be paying for for the next 30 years.



Wait, weren't you the guy who predicted that a Republican would win in 2008?
Logged
GLPman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,160
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 06, 2011, 01:18:00 PM »

With this GOP field? Probably not.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2011, 02:19:26 PM »

It effects everyone, but this is the perfect opportunity for the President to ding the Tea Party freshmen on their selfish agenda to unseat him at the expense of tanking the economy.
Logged
specific_name
generic_name
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,261
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2011, 02:20:48 PM »

Even if he's blamed for it, which doesn't seem to be the case, I don't think it matters too much. A lot more bad news is coming in the next few months, depending on how the chips fall. The decisive point of crisis is yet to come.
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2011, 04:38:55 PM »

If anything it slightly raises Obama's floor. Nothing else though especially considering the electorate's memory
Logged
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2011, 05:02:30 PM »
« Edited: August 06, 2011, 09:43:28 PM by t_host1 »

 No, it has been already established that the report was a campaign position paper forwarded to S & P. It helps the if reelected Obama state that the problems he's inheriting were of his previous administration.

a _troll Roll Eyes
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2011, 05:02:56 PM »

It will hurt him as a campaign slogan from opponents who will paint him as Economically inept.

But Obama can try to come out on top by blaming the GOP Congress, but for some reason, he's had difficulty with his message since January 2009.  He was a good one-note campaigner in 2008 - "Change, Change, Hope, Hope" - but the past few network-breaking speeches seem to be whiny.  

I don't think he can recapture that "message magic" because he is no longer the insurgent, but the establishment.  The Tea Party has become the government insurgents.  
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2011, 05:11:11 PM »

I don't think he can recapture that "message magic" because he is no longer the insurgent, but the establishment.  The Tea Party has become the government insurgents.  

The Tea Party is and always was the establishment. They're bankrolled by the Koch brothers.

Besides, the Tea Party just reached record low approval ratings.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2011, 08:47:49 PM »

Partisans on both sides will blame the other but they were already going to vote they way they were going to vote. To the extent that they are paying attention, blame for independents will depend on who sells their argument best. Polling has shown that independents mostly supported the Obama "balanced" approach to dealing with the debt issue so Obama has an advantage, but GOP are good at selling a message.

However, by election time this will be Obama's economy and so if this has an ugly interest spike that hits real people, all incumbents (including Obama) will get the blame.

I would not be surprised to see a Republican win the white house and the Dems get the House back.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,022
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2011, 09:41:53 PM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.

It was Obama's strong support that passed the stimulus.  It increased debt, and had virtually no long term positive effect on the economy.  The Democrats had two years to look at method to reduce debt, and increase revenue; they did nothing, except increase spending and ultimately, this year, blocking revenue increases.

This was probably a strategic mistake for which the Democrats may be paying for for the next 30 years.



Wait, weren't you the guy who predicted that a Republican would win in 2008?

He insisted that the Bradley Effect meant that the polls didn't matter and Obama would lose.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2011, 09:49:40 PM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.

It was Obama's strong support that passed the stimulus.  It increased debt, and had virtually no long term positive effect on the economy.  The Democrats had two years to look at method to reduce debt, and increase revenue; they did nothing, except increase spending and ultimately, this year, blocking revenue increases.

This was probably a strategic mistake for which the Democrats may be paying for for the next 30 years.



Wait, weren't you the guy who predicted that a Republican would win in 2008?

He insisted that the Bradley Effect meant that the polls didn't matter and Obama would lose.
Sweet Sarah Palin was suposed to get a huge sympathy vote as well.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2011, 09:55:33 PM »


Agreed

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You have it backward.  The increasingly likely Obama recession could lead to something looking like Jimmy Carter's re-election results.  This is but a symptom that the county needs a change and Obamanomics wasn't it.

It is not a question of the county being in bad shape in 2012; it is a question of the county being in worse shape than it was in 2008.
What are Obamanomics?
The Bush Stimulus that Obama made the (what may have been a) tactical mistake of endorsing.

It was Obama's strong support that passed the stimulus.  It increased debt, and had virtually no long term positive effect on the economy.  The Democrats had two years to look at method to reduce debt, and increase revenue; they did nothing, except increase spending and ultimately, this year, blocking revenue increases.

This was probably a strategic mistake for which the Democrats may be paying for for the next 30 years.



Wait, weren't you the guy who predicted that a Republican would win in 2008?

Yes, barely, followed by very hard economic times, the "deluge." 

Welcome to the deluge.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 13 queries.