Social Affairs and Welfare Committee (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:26:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games
  Mock Parliament (Moderators: Hash, Dereich)
  Social Affairs and Welfare Committee (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Social Affairs and Welfare Committee  (Read 3896 times)
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


« on: August 08, 2011, 01:26:08 PM »

x Johannes Overgaard, MP
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2011, 11:46:45 AM »

I think, then, that most of us would agree that it was an error to model the DRC so closely on the LDDC? I am thinking especially of the freezing out of local government.

"Indeed. I share Mr. MacPherson's sentiments on this issue."
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2011, 02:50:57 PM »

No objection, Mr. Chairman.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2011, 01:21:16 PM »

The vote is on the following motion:

This committee finds that the Docklands Redevelopment Corporation (hereafter referred to as the 'DRC') is unfit for purpose and on the verge of a catastrophic collapse that would damage the reputation of both the City of St Marks and the entire nation of Antillia. It has concluded that it was a fundamental error to model the DRC on the London Docklands Redevelopment Corporation, given both the questionable nature of that body's redevelopment work and the obvious differences between the economic structures of St Marks and London. It has not found that it is wrong to use private finance and private experience in major regeneration projects, but it has found that great care must be taken when doing so. Moreover, it has also concluded that never again should local government be so comprehensively cut out from major regeneration projects. The Committee has also has uncovered evidence of gross mismanagement and of the abuse of public money. It recommends the immediate dismissal of the DRC's entire Board of Directors and of its senior management (including its Chief Executive, Mr John Galdeford), and calls for the DRC to be temporarily managed by St Marks City Council until the conclusion of a Royal Commission on the DRC, which it believes that the Secretary of State for Social Affairs and Welfare must implement immediately.

Members of the Committee shall, in the time honoured fashion, vote Aye or Nay.

Aye.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.