If McCain had won, would Kucinich have a "shot" at the Democratic nomination?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:10:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  If McCain had won, would Kucinich have a "shot" at the Democratic nomination?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If McCain had won, would Kucinich have a "shot" at the Democratic nomination?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: If McCain had won, would Kucinich have a "shot" at the Democratic nomination?  (Read 1467 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,403
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 09, 2011, 07:04:43 PM »

And by a "shot," in the sense that Ron Paul has a "shot" at the Republican nomination today - polling well, rather than in the low single digits like last time.  Would Kucinich have an outside shot like Paul does?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2011, 07:11:31 PM »

No.
Logged
I AM REPUBLICAN
NJGuy
Rookie
**
Posts: 26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2011, 07:14:39 PM »

Absolutely not. Besides, nobody knows who Dennis is. Although, people who do know who he is make funny nicknames for him, like Denny K, or Eat At Denny's, where you get nothing but crap.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2011, 07:30:28 PM »

Chances are it would either be Hillary (if she chooses to run) or Feingold. Heck, even Gore could give it one last shot.
Logged
Reluctant Republican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2011, 07:48:48 PM »

I always thought Kucinich was the left's Ron Paul, but he does not seem to popular with even liberals. I'm not exactly sure what his niche is. I like him okay, but maybe that's telling.

The left would embrace Feingold. More electable and popular.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2011, 07:51:34 PM »

If McCain had won, Obama would be elected president in 2012.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2011, 08:55:44 PM »

If McCain had won then Hillary would be measuring the drapes in the White House (again).

I think, like Kerry, Gore, etc. Obama wouldnt run again.
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2011, 09:05:49 PM »

No. It would have been Clinton or Obama.

Kucinich is no Ron Paul. Paul came second in Nevada, raised a bunch of funds, had high ID, and rallied libertarians. Kucinich was ranting with no base and no where to go.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2011, 09:10:19 PM »

Nope. There's a key difference between Paul and Kucinich: Paul has a very solid base that will support whatever he decides to do. Kucinich doesn't.
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,467
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2011, 10:22:35 PM »

I would like it to be so, but no. Not really.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2011, 10:39:49 PM »
« Edited: August 09, 2011, 10:42:25 PM by Sic Semper Tyrannis »

America is a very right-wing country, overall.  The far-left and far-right -- if you can call Ron Paul far-right -- are not equal.  You can sound very right-wing and say things like "the IRS should be abolished" without being too shocking, but if you say something far-left like "ban all handguns, lower the voting age to sixteen" and it could be like shouting the f-word at a child's birthday party.
Logged
hfred
Rookie
**
Posts: 39


Political Matrix
E: 5.81, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2011, 10:45:14 PM »

I could see another candidate from the left of the Democratic party getting more support than usual, but not Kucinich. Someone like Feingold would be the most likely.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2011, 10:49:54 PM »

Hillary would be the nominee and would win over Palin or Romeny
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2011, 01:34:06 AM »

America is a very right-wing country, overall.  The far-left and far-right -- if you can call Ron Paul far-right -- are not equal.  You can sound very right-wing and say things like "the IRS should be abolished" without being too shocking, but if you say something far-left like "ban all handguns, lower the voting age to sixteen" and it could be like shouting the f-word at a child's birthday party.

I'm contesting this... from my experience of living there it's not a 'right-wing' country, it's a centre-right country.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2011, 09:39:10 AM »

I think Paul more likely would have won the Democratic nomination than Kucinich, even if Paul refused to run as a Democrat or even run. That's how bad Kucinich is.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2011, 11:42:40 AM »

America is a very right-wing country, overall.  The far-left and far-right -- if you can call Ron Paul far-right -- are not equal.  You can sound very right-wing and say things like "the IRS should be abolished" without being too shocking, but if you say something far-left like "ban all handguns, lower the voting age to sixteen" and it could be like shouting the f-word at a child's birthday party.

I'm contesting this... from my experience of living there it's not a 'right-wing' country, it's a centre-right country.

Well, yes.  But even the Democrats are on the right, for the most part, and the progressive movement is tiny.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2011, 12:22:39 PM »

In short, no.

He'd do better than MOE, though.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2011, 12:26:23 PM »

Chances are it would either be Hillary (if she chooses to run) or Feingold.
Who would just have been triumphantly reelected in his Senate race.
Logged
Username MechaRFK
RFK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,270
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2011, 03:45:20 PM »

I wish but the corrupt machine won't let the poor guy ever win the nomination.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 14 queries.