Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 11:20:05 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22 Print
Author Topic: Polls on Same-Sex Marriage State Laws  (Read 25642 times)
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2185


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #325 on: June 18, 2012, 07:42:53 pm »
Ignore

http://twitter.com/ppppolls/status/214734857002164225

Quote
Going to have good news for pro-gay marriage side in WA tomorrow.
Pretty decent chance equality advocates go 4 for 4 this fall
8:02 AM June 18, 2012

Yeah, 2012 looks pretty good. The Maine/Maryland/Washington initiatives are favored to win and it's very possible Minnesota will reject the constitutional ban.

As far as new states passing constitutional bans, there's really only four possibilities left: Indiana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wyoming.



None of these four states allow for citizen initiatives that amend the state constitution so it's been up to the state legislatures to refer a ban.

Indiana/Pennsylvania - I think split control in the state legislature has prevented referring a constitutional ban in these two previously, but Republicans won both these state legislatures in 2010. I was expecting them to pass bans in 2011 that were referred to the 2012 ballot like NC/MN Republicans did but it turns out these two states require a constitutional amendment to pass in two consecutive legislative sessions before it is referred to the ballot. It might fail if Democrats win control of one of the chambers of the state legislatures in the Nov. 2012 elections or if Republicans opt for amendments that ban both gay marriage and civil unions. I could see the bans failing in 2016 but sadly I think they'd have a high chance of passing in 2013/2014.

West Virginia - WV Democrats haven't passed a state constitutional ban and I think they only would in response to the state supreme court overturning the statutory ban. Of course there's also the possibility Republicans will win the state legislature sometime this decade.

Wyoming - No idea why Republicans haven't referred a ban here. They've controlled the state legislature for 30+ years and it would probably pass with 60%+ of the vote.

It's going to look pretty weird to look back and see 30+ state constitutional amendments banning gay marriage/civil unions pass from 1998 to 2014/16 Tongue
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6537
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #326 on: June 18, 2012, 08:23:29 pm »
Ignore

Constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage have continuously failed in the Wyoming Republican legislature. They're an interesting bunch. I don't think one would ever pass the legislature there.
Logged

Governor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11044
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #327 on: June 18, 2012, 08:50:30 pm »
Ignore

I think Wyoming is one of those states where odd, libertarianish Republicans dominate the party base.
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2185


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #328 on: June 18, 2012, 08:56:36 pm »
Ignore

Constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage have continuously failed in the Wyoming Republican legislature. They're an interesting bunch. I don't think one would ever pass the legislature there.

I think Wyoming is one of those states where odd, libertarianish Republicans dominate the party base.

This could be part of it now that I think about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6537
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #329 on: June 18, 2012, 09:09:03 pm »
Ignore

Maybe, but I don't think it plays that big a part.
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21463
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #330 on: June 18, 2012, 10:39:13 pm »
Ignore

Wyoming - No idea why Republicans haven't referred a ban here. They've controlled the state legislature for 30+ years and it would probably pass with 60%+ of the vote.

They don't need it as a wedge issue and they likely have no fear that the Wyoming Supreme Court will overturn the legislative ban.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2185


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #331 on: June 20, 2012, 02:54:10 am »
Ignore

June 2012 Washington poll:

Do you think same-sex marriage should be legal or illegal?

Legal ............................................................... 51%
Illegal .............................................................. 42%
Not sure .......................................................... 7%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_WA_619.pdf

WA PPP results from February 2012: 49% legal, 44% illegal, 7% not sure
WA PPP results from May 2011: 46% legal, 44% illegal, 10% not sure

Logged
I Can't Get That Sound You Make, Out Of My Head
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2917
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #332 on: June 20, 2012, 05:10:51 am »
Ignore

Will constitutional amendments be overturned if a Roe v Wade-esque decision is passed?
Logged
Ebowed
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16019
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.76, S: -8.96

View Profile WWW
« Reply #333 on: June 20, 2012, 05:58:04 am »
Ignore

Will constitutional amendments be overturned if a Roe v Wade-esque decision is passed?

Yes, the federal constitution overrides any state constitutions
Logged

While Obama was snorting coke and memorizing Marx, Romney was out there helping people and building success.
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2185


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #334 on: July 05, 2012, 07:31:17 pm »
Ignore

June 2012 Massachusetts poll:

Do you think same-sex marriage should be legal or illegal?

Legal ............................................................... 62%
Illegal .............................................................. 30%
Not sure .......................................................... 8%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MA_062812.pdf

MA PPP results from March 2012: 58% legal, 31% illegal, 11% not sure
MA PPP results from September 2011: 60% legal, 30% illegal, 10% not sure
MA PPP results from June 2011: 59% legal, 33% illegal, 8% not sure

June 2012 Ohio poll:

Do you think same-sex marriage should be legal or illegal?

Legal ............................................................... 37%
Illegal .............................................................. 50%
Not sure .......................................................... 14%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_Miscellaneous_OH_062812.pdf

OH PPP results from May 2012: 35% legal, 52% illegal, 13% not sure
OH PPP results from October 2011: 32% legal, 55% illegal, 13% not sure
OH PPP results from August 2011: 33% legal, 53% illegal, 14% not sure

June 2012 Oregon poll:

Do you think same-sex marriage should be legal or illegal?

Legal ............................................................... 46%
Illegal .............................................................. 45%
Not sure .......................................................... 9%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_OR_070512.pdf

OR PPP results from June 2011: 48% legal, 42% illegal, 11% not sure

« Last Edit: July 22, 2012, 05:00:58 pm by greenforest32 »Logged
Governor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11044
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #335 on: July 05, 2012, 07:34:52 pm »
Ignore

Still much work to be done.
Logged

I Can't Get That Sound You Make, Out Of My Head
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2917
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #336 on: July 06, 2012, 07:50:42 am »
Ignore

Poor numbers from Oregon.
Logged
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2185


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #337 on: July 06, 2012, 08:03:18 am »
Ignore

We've seen a few polls (Iowa and Minnesota I think?) slip back a few points within the margin of error, but I agree. Though this is the poll that has Obama down by 22 points against Romney with OR independents.

It looks like holding off at the 2012 measure was a good idea. There will probably be some peer pressure encouraging a 2014 push provided Washington upholds it this year and California's lawsuit ends with the Supreme Court refusing to hear the appeal and thus legalization in 2013.

Worst case scenario, it will be held off until 2016.
Logged
BaldEagle1991
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1025
United States


View Profile
« Reply #338 on: July 06, 2012, 09:39:24 pm »
Ignore

Where are the polls out of Georgia?
Logged

"Weezy F Baby and the F is for Phenomenal" - Lil' Wayne

"Look at this photograph/Every time I do it makes me laugh/How did our eyes get so red?/And what the hell is on Joey's head?" - Nickelback
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27948
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #339 on: July 21, 2012, 12:09:42 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota is now very, very unlikely to approve SSM in November, says a new SurveyUSA poll:

52% for the man/woman marriage amendment
37% against
  5% won't vote
  6% not sure

GOP: 75-12 support
DEM: 54-38 oppose
IND: 48-42 support

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2698095.shtml?cat=1

Washington is a different story though, also by SurveyUSA:

"A new law passed by the legislature would allow same-sex couples to marry in Washington state. Should this law be approved? Or rejected?"

50% Approve
43% Rejected

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=2786ebbd-3348-4795-b0a8-0ee124a9707d
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6537
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #340 on: July 21, 2012, 12:20:25 pm »
Ignore

Pretty close in Washington, but then again, seems like it'll be close either way, huh? SUSA was good in Washington for R-74 two years ago, though. I feel like R-74 will need about a 10 point lead in the polls to win "comfortably".
« Last Edit: July 21, 2012, 12:22:33 pm by Holmes »Logged

krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5146


View Profile
« Reply #341 on: July 21, 2012, 12:44:56 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota is now very, very unlikely to approve SSM in November, says a new SurveyUSA poll:

52% for the man/woman marriage amendment
37% against
  5% won't vote
  6% not sure

GOP: 75-12 support
DEM: 54-38 oppose
IND: 48-42 support

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2698095.shtml?cat=1

Washington is a different story though, also by SurveyUSA:

"A new law passed by the legislature would allow same-sex couples to marry in Washington state. Should this law be approved? Or rejected?"

50% Approve
43% Rejected

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=2786ebbd-3348-4795-b0a8-0ee124a9707d

Ha. That debunks PPP's gutter trash poll from about a month ago.
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6537
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #342 on: July 21, 2012, 12:50:26 pm »
Ignore

One poll debunking another poll from over a month ago. Thanks for you valuable contribution to this thread.
Logged

TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2897
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #343 on: July 21, 2012, 02:36:34 pm »
Ignore

Wyoming - No idea why Republicans haven't referred a ban here. They've controlled the state legislature for 30+ years and it would probably pass with 60%+ of the vote.

They don't need it as a wedge issue and they likely have no fear that the Wyoming Supreme Court will overturn the legislative ban.

Trying to ban gay marriage would cost the GOP support in Wyoming, as it did in Idaho six years ago (if you don't believe me, look at how badly it fared in Boise's recently developed neighborhoods and suburbs). The amount of ire the all-important libertarian-esque independents have towards the fundamentalist brand of social conservative is surprising.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
Governor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11044
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #344 on: July 21, 2012, 02:58:32 pm »
Ignore

Who knew there were so many DINOs in MN?
Logged

TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2897
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #345 on: July 21, 2012, 02:59:50 pm »
Ignore

Who knew there were so many DINOs in MN?

SUSA is notoriously bad at polling MN but the lack of support among Democrats for gay marriage has been a recurring theme of this debate. It's why Aroostook County was the bastion against it in Maine.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6537
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #346 on: July 21, 2012, 03:15:26 pm »
Ignore

Aroostook county is "Democratic" (rather, it seems more Republican than the state average more often than not) for different reasons than areas in Minnesota, though. Comparing them is silly.
Logged

TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2897
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #347 on: July 21, 2012, 03:24:09 pm »
Ignore

Aroostook county is "Democratic" (rather, it seems more Republican than the state average more often than not) for different reasons than areas in Minnesota, though. Comparing them is silly.

Sure but it shares more than a few similarities with the Iron Range and the fact that a swing county would vote so strongly against the state average illustrates my point. I should have just noted how poorly the "No" side fared in the strip of the Iron Range that extends into Wisconsin. It performed on par with the state average there.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8975


View Profile
« Reply #348 on: July 21, 2012, 06:03:47 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota is now very, very unlikely to approve SSM in November, says a new SurveyUSA poll:

52% for the man/woman marriage amendment
37% against
  5% won't vote
  6% not sure

GOP: 75-12 support
DEM: 54-38 oppose
IND: 48-42 support

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2698095.shtml?cat=1

Washington is a different story though, also by SurveyUSA:

"A new law passed by the legislature would allow same-sex couples to marry in Washington state. Should this law be approved? Or rejected?"

50% Approve
43% Rejected

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=2786ebbd-3348-4795-b0a8-0ee124a9707d

Ha. That debunks PPP's gutter trash poll from about a month ago.

Why do you care?
Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5146


View Profile
« Reply #349 on: July 21, 2012, 06:47:02 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota is now very, very unlikely to approve SSM in November, says a new SurveyUSA poll:

52% for the man/woman marriage amendment
37% against
  5% won't vote
  6% not sure

GOP: 75-12 support
DEM: 54-38 oppose
IND: 48-42 support

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2698095.shtml?cat=1

Washington is a different story though, also by SurveyUSA:

"A new law passed by the legislature would allow same-sex couples to marry in Washington state. Should this law be approved? Or rejected?"

50% Approve
43% Rejected

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=2786ebbd-3348-4795-b0a8-0ee124a9707d

Ha. That debunks PPP's gutter trash poll from about a month ago.

Why do you care?

Mr. Nathan, sir, there is something to be said about the merit of discrediting pollsters that have an obvious dubious agenda and that do not seek to represent the people.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory