Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2015, 11:12:33 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  Electors refuse to vote
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Electors refuse to vote  (Read 3028 times)
Thoughtful Cynic
exnaderite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5534


View Profile
« on: December 17, 2004, 03:38:53 am »
Ignore

What if the electors meet at a state capitol and collectively refuse to vote?
Logged
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29926
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2004, 08:04:31 pm »
Ignore

Like in any case where no one reaches a plurality, it would go to the house, I think.
Logged

n/c
The Year Summer Ended In July
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 74800
France


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2004, 09:00:54 pm »
Ignore

Like in any case where no one reaches a plurality, it would go to the house, I think.

actually one candidate needs a majority, not a plurality, if there's 3 candidates and no one breaks 270, it goes to the House. That was the goal of Strom Thurmond and George Wallace actually, they wanted to scare the national Democrats by forcing the House to decide the election, sort of a way to send a message.
Logged

Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29926
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2004, 09:23:32 pm »
Ignore

Like in any case where no one reaches a plurality, it would go to the house, I think.

actually one candidate needs a majority, not a plurality, if there's 3 candidates and no one breaks 270, it goes to the House. That was the goal of Strom Thurmond and George Wallace actually, they wanted to scare the national Democrats by forcing the House to decide the election, sort of a way to send a message.

That is what I meant. Obviously a plurality would result even if candidates did not hit 269. I meant a majority of the electoral votes. Yet again I should stop posting with the flu.
Logged

n/c
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32065
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2004, 11:22:19 pm »
Ignore

Election requires a majority of the electors appointed, so if enough abstained, is would go to the House.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines