That's pretty much view of the guy, yeah.
Someone on AH.com once said that some people are attracted to his bold, no-nonsense stand against the Iraq War, which leads them to overlook that he spends the rest of his time taking bold, all-nonsense stands on everything else.
It has become pretty clear that only a Paul or a Kucinich will fix our dangerous foreign policy mistakes here in the US of A.
It makes far more sense to spend billions on sensible causes like occupying countries that have asked us to leave, guarding Afghani poppy fields, Israeli bulldozers and
Al Qaeda Libyan freedom fighters than over here, Napoleon. Even liberal intellectuals like Obama think that. Why can't you be more sensible?
