If the Democrats win 49 states...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:36:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  If the Democrats win 49 states...
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: If the Democrats win 49 states (plus DC), which state would go GOP?
#1
Utah
 
#2
Wyoming
 
#3
Idaho
 
#4
Alaska
 
#5
Nebraska
 
#6
Montana
 
#7
Kansas
 
#8
Oklahoma
 
#9
Texas
 
#10
North Dakota
 
#11
South Dakota
 
#12
Mississippi
 
#13
Alabama
 
#14
South Carolina
 
#15
other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 66

Author Topic: If the Democrats win 49 states...  (Read 5317 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 17, 2004, 10:08:40 PM »

I think Mississippi would be one of the last, if not the last, to go Democratic, even though it was only the 15th most Republican in 2004.

In a landslide Democratic election, the increase in blacks voting Democratic would be small (it is already close to 100%). And a high proportion of Democrats in Mississippi are black.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2004, 10:12:59 PM »

1. Utah
2. Idaho
3. Alaska
4. Mississippi
5. Alabama
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2004, 10:21:12 PM »

Alaska
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2004, 10:30:20 PM »

I think Mississippi would be one of the last, if not the last, to go Democratic, even though it was only the 15th most Republican in 2004.

In a landslide Democratic election, the increase in blacks voting Democratic would be small (it is already close to 100%). And a high proportion of Democrats in Mississippi are black.

I'd still say Utah, but Mississippi would be 2nd.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2004, 11:06:07 PM »

Utah, the state that voted over 70% for Bush...
Logged
J.R. Brown
Rutzay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 717
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2004, 11:48:07 PM »

I chose Utah.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2004, 11:55:54 PM »

Utah probably, unless the candidate was from one of those states.
It'd be really hard for a Dem to win MS, but even harder on UT, I think.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2004, 01:25:20 PM »

1.Utah
2.Idaho
3.Wyoming
4. Alaska
5. Alabama

But I highly doubt a Democrat would win 49 states unless they basically run as a conservative and theirs no liberal candidate running.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2004, 01:27:35 PM »

Either Utah or Idaho. I'm not sure which one.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2004, 04:02:33 PM »

Utah
Idaho
Nebraska
Alabama
Oklahoma
Logged
George W. Hobbes
Mr. Hobbes
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 962


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.03

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2004, 07:21:38 PM »

Utah, unless Sen. Callahan is running
Logged
Hitchabrut
republicanjew18
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674


Political Matrix
E: 8.38, S: 7.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2004, 07:56:35 PM »

Utah
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2004, 08:26:17 PM »

Utah
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2004, 10:21:33 PM »

I’d also say Utah...  But I’d have to know the candidates, what Dem do you think could win 49 states?  What Rep do you think could win only one state?

If I knew the answer to these questions, I could make a map & pie-charts Wink
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2004, 10:50:43 PM »

I’d also say Utah...  But I’d have to know the candidates, what Dem do you think could win 49 states?  What Rep do you think could win only one state?

If I knew the answer to these questions, I could make a map & pie-charts Wink

Evan Bayh v. Pat Buchanan
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2004, 11:36:31 AM »
« Edited: December 29, 2004, 01:42:31 PM by CheeseWhiz »

Sorry it took me so long, I forgot about this one.

Well, I don’t really know… but here's my best guess.  Tell me if anything looks unrealistic.

                                      Pat Buchanan vs. Evan Bayh

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2004, 12:02:46 PM »

That might happen if the Republican candidate is a Mormon and it has just turned out that the LDS have a secret stockpile of nukes and have sold a few of them to Osama Bin Laden. Smiley

Seriously though, it's not really possible to answer the question. Reps winning only one state is so unlikely that Reps winning only Utah is not really that much more likely, in absolute terms, than Reps winning only Rhode Island.
Logged
Josh
cyberlord
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 386


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2004, 01:07:45 PM »

I'd have to say either Utah, Alabama, Mississippi, or Idaho.  Not sure which, though.  This is such an unlikely scenario (sadly...Tongue) that it's hard to just pick one state.
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2004, 01:38:55 PM »

I forgot to mention that the map is going on King's suggestion of Pat Buchanan vs. Evan Bayh.  I've added that information to my map post.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2004, 01:58:27 PM »

Sorry it took me so long, I forgot about this one.

Well, I don’t really know… but here's my best guess.  Tell me if anything looks unrealistic.

                                      Pat Buchanan vs. Evan Bayh



Why would Buchanan lose his home town of DC. Grin
Logged
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2004, 03:59:55 PM »

DC is the most solidly Democratic part of the country. Ever since they gained the right to vote for president in 1964 they haven't had less than an 80% Democratic vote.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2004, 04:17:50 PM »

It wouldn't happen, since there's no obvious reason why 1 of the conservative states would go GOP and none of the others. So we would be talking about a moderate Dem up against a failed social libertarian perhaps? Then what, Alaska is most likely to be left?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2004, 04:35:09 PM »

DC is the most solidly Democratic part of the country. Ever since they gained the right to vote for president in 1964 they haven't had less than an 80% Democratic vote.

He was joking. Wink

Anyway, I think it is worth explaining Idaho and Utah:

Idaho and Utah both are oddly similar states. Although Idaho is not famous for Mormonism, it has a very similar level of Mormon population. HOWEVER, while areas of Utah have less Mormon population, areas of Idaho have little.

Let's compare maps:

Idaho




In Idaho, unsurprisingly, Bush did best in the more Mormon southern area. However, counties containing major cities were typically closer, with some exceptions. Those are Ada (Boise, 61-38); Bannock (Pocatello, 62-37); Bonner (Sandpoint, 61-38); Bonneville (Idaho Falls, 77-22); Canyon (Nampa, 75-24); Kootenai (Coeur d'Alene, 66-33); Latah (Moscow, 50-48); and Twin Falls (Twin Falls, 74-24).

The major problem for a Democrat carrying Idaho would be the south part - "Little Utah" - which includes the counties of Owyhee (80-19), Twin Falls (74-24), Cassia (84-15), Oneida (84-14), Franklin (87-9), and Bear Lake (82-16).

The other major problem is "Little Wyoming," or the northeastern corner of the southern section of the state. This are includes the counties of Clark (86-13), Fremont (86-13), Jefferson (87-12), Madison (92-7), and Teton (61-38).

The north, in towns like Moscow and Coeur d'Alene, is truly the Democrat's only chance. These areas are much like urban eastern Washington in that they will go strongly for a moderate candidate. The rest of the north would love a moderate populist who is against gun control.





Utah is harder. Its populated counties are Box Elder (Trementon, 80-19); Cache (Logan, 82-16); Davis (Bountiful and northern SLC suburbs, 79-19); Salt Lake (Salt Lake City, 60-38); Tooele (Tooele, 73-25); Utah (Provo, 86-12); and Weber (Ogden, 70-27).

Provo is the single biggest problem the Democrats will ever have in Utah, and for good reason. Salt Lake City (recently called a "developing bastion of liberalism" by the local newspaper - to my entertainment) has a high Mormon population, but not massive. Provo (Utah County), on the other hand, has a massive Mormon population. Utah County casts about 16% of Utah's votes, and they aren't for Democrats.

Salt Lake County has a profound affect on the vote, casting 39% of the ballots. With it, the result is 71.54%-26.00% for Bush. Removing the county takes the result to 79.20%-18.61%. Flipping the result for Salt Lake County changes the result to 62.94%-34.59%.

Still, though, it would be a lot harder to flip Provo and Salt Lake City with their highly Republican Mormon population than it would hunters in northern Idaho.

So the answer, pretty definitely, is Utah.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2004, 06:01:10 PM »

Alcon: That's some of the best analysis I've seen for a while on here :-)
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2004, 06:03:49 PM »

Alcon: That's some of the best analysis I've seen for a while on here :-)

Thanks. Glad to know that I have wasted so much time on, err, demystified, Utah and Idaho. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 13 queries.