Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2016, 03:28:46 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderators: Beet, Apocrypha)
| | |-+  Thoughts on "The Jennifer Act"?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Thoughts on "The Jennifer Act"?  (Read 4076 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9165
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2011, 10:57:39 am »
Ignore

Hmm, imprisoning people without charge for a year?

No thanks.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11379
Ireland, Republic of
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: September 13, 2011, 11:39:51 am »
Ignore

I don't support this. I pretty much agree with what Franzl's been saying - I'll have some actual original thoughts later though. Tongue
Logged
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: September 13, 2011, 11:52:56 am »
Ignore

Another day posting, another discussion where good people who believe in freedom have to help Antonio realize he is essentially a social conservative.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15293


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: September 13, 2011, 03:24:09 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Logged

What will happen if a hen impregnates an asteroid? Certainly, this will result in a snow storm over the Canary Islands, which will guarantee an FDP landslide in the next Nigerian election. Do you get me?
Jante's Law Revivalist
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40894
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #29 on: September 13, 2011, 03:26:16 pm »
Ignore

Another day posting, another discussion where good people who believe in freedom have to help Antonio realize he is essentially a social conservative.

Thanks for giving your thoughtful contribution to the debate.
Logged


"The major political task that we face in the next five months is to make certain that Donald [Drumpf] is defeated and defeated badly."

Bernie Sanders, 06/14/2016
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: September 13, 2011, 04:07:52 pm »
Ignore

Another day posting, another discussion where good people who believe in freedom have to help Antonio realize he is essentially a social conservative.

Thanks for giving your thoughtful contribution to the debate.

Considering the debate here basically started with my post, thank you.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15458
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #31 on: September 13, 2011, 04:35:06 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Are you serious? As a general philosophical standpoint, who's to say what's stupid and what isn't? That presumes omniscience on the part of those in power.
It's one thing to say that someone should be able to step in when someone's judgment has been compromised though an addiction.
But saying people aren't ever allowed to make stupid decisions is pretty much the definition of totalitarianism.
Logged
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15293


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: September 13, 2011, 05:19:24 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Are you serious? As a general philosophical standpoint, who's to say what's stupid and what isn't? That presumes omniscience on the part of those in power.
It's one thing to say that someone should be able to step in when someone's judgment has been compromised though an addiction.
But saying people aren't ever allowed to make stupid decisions is pretty much the definition of totalitarianism.

Well, I do not claim omniscience, but I can tell you that the effects of drugs such as these are greatly detrimental to one's health and general well-being. Why should I, in good conscience, allow a friend to do something that would hurt or harm themselves, that, if they were fully informed of the consequences, would not do? Such a belief is a logical extension of that. Totaliarianism? I'd call it Hobbesian paternalism.
Logged

What will happen if a hen impregnates an asteroid? Certainly, this will result in a snow storm over the Canary Islands, which will guarantee an FDP landslide in the next Nigerian election. Do you get me?
Oakvale
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11379
Ireland, Republic of
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: September 13, 2011, 05:32:01 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Are you serious? As a general philosophical standpoint, who's to say what's stupid and what isn't? That presumes omniscience on the part of those in power.
It's one thing to say that someone should be able to step in when someone's judgment has been compromised though an addiction.
But saying people aren't ever allowed to make stupid decisions is pretty much the definition of totalitarianism.

Well, I do not claim omniscience, but I can tell you that the effects of drugs such as these are greatly detrimental to one's health and general well-being. Why should I, in good conscience, allow a friend to do something that would hurt or harm themselves, that, if they were fully informed of the consequences, would not do?

Because they're an individual and ultimately responsible for their own decisions? Huh
Logged
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 13, 2011, 05:33:02 pm »
Ignore

Who are you to
A. Decide what is best for someone else's well-being
B. Assume one does not know and accept the consequences of their own decision??
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: September 13, 2011, 05:36:10 pm »
Ignore

Upon reading the bill, this may just be the worst proposal I've seen since "patent reform" made its debut.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15293


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: September 13, 2011, 06:14:23 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Are you serious? As a general philosophical standpoint, who's to say what's stupid and what isn't? That presumes omniscience on the part of those in power.
It's one thing to say that someone should be able to step in when someone's judgment has been compromised though an addiction.
But saying people aren't ever allowed to make stupid decisions is pretty much the definition of totalitarianism.

Well, I do not claim omniscience, but I can tell you that the effects of drugs such as these are greatly detrimental to one's health and general well-being. Why should I, in good conscience, allow a friend to do something that would hurt or harm themselves, that, if they were fully informed of the consequences, would not do?

Because they're an individual and ultimately responsible for their own decisions? Huh

Surely it would be remiss of me not to try to help them? Vague ideas of "responsibility" aside, I care for them and would want to help them. That is the essence of the matter.

Who are you to
A. Decide what is best for someone else's well-being
B. Assume one does not know and accept the consequences of their own decision??

A. When such a course is obviously wrong, such as jumping off a cliff or shooting a random person, I feel like I can draw a conclusion on what is best in such a situation. If a friend is addicted to a drug and his life is being drawn away by it, I think that it's fairly clear that it's for his good that action be taken before he dies. Does he want to die? Likely not. If a person takes an action but wants a different result than that will occur, then something should be done. I don't believe in moral relativism.

B. Are you telling me that drug addicts want to become addicted and mentally and physically ill? Those who commit suicide don't usually want to die, they want to end their suffering and the misery they encounter in their life. I want to combat the misery and suffering, and they may not see the way to end it. So yes, many times, they don't know.
Logged

What will happen if a hen impregnates an asteroid? Certainly, this will result in a snow storm over the Canary Islands, which will guarantee an FDP landslide in the next Nigerian election. Do you get me?
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2011, 06:24:49 pm »
Ignore

Shooting a random person is not the same thing as using drugs. Fail. You are relying on subjectivity to make an arguement that should be given an objective and logical rationale.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15293


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2011, 06:34:52 pm »
Ignore

Shooting a random person is not the same thing as using drugs. Fail. You are relying on subjectivity to make an arguement that should be given an objective and logical rationale.

I thought we were speaking on broader terms here. Sorry. Unless you want to dispute the harmful effects of drugs, I don't think you can say that they are somehow ambiguous in their effect. And I return to my prior point (I wasn't entirely subjective, you see).  If a person is addicted to a drug and his life is being drawn away by it, I think that it's fairly clear that it's for his good that action be taken before he dies. Does he start taking drugs thinking "I'm going to slowly  drain my life away! Hurray!" If he does, he doesn't value his life and is foolish for not doing so. Most people, however don't think that way, and never do as their addiction deepens.
Logged

What will happen if a hen impregnates an asteroid? Certainly, this will result in a snow storm over the Canary Islands, which will guarantee an FDP landslide in the next Nigerian election. Do you get me?
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15053


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: September 13, 2011, 07:03:54 pm »
Ignore

Have you read the law?
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15293


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 5.91


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2011, 07:37:30 pm »
Ignore

The summary, yes.
Logged

What will happen if a hen impregnates an asteroid? Certainly, this will result in a snow storm over the Canary Islands, which will guarantee an FDP landslide in the next Nigerian election. Do you get me?
Jante's Law Revivalist
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40894
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #41 on: September 14, 2011, 02:26:08 am »
Ignore

Simfan, don't waste your time trying to discuss with stubborn hacks like Napoleon. Life is much better if you just ignore them.
Logged


"The major political task that we face in the next five months is to make certain that Donald [Drumpf] is defeated and defeated badly."

Bernie Sanders, 06/14/2016
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28101


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P

View Profile
« Reply #42 on: September 14, 2011, 04:24:29 am »
Ignore

In general I do believe people have a right to make bad decisions for themselves as long as it does not harm others too much.

However, depending on what kind of addiction we're talking about, it's arguable whether you're making your own decisions anymore. If I'm addicted to a hard drug like heroin does it really make sense to talk of my "decision" to care about nothing else in the world and betray everyone I know to get more of my drug? I'm not convinced on that point.

Angus is making a fair point though, so I can't say I support the bill.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.52, S: -0.70

P P P
View Profile WWW
« Reply #43 on: September 14, 2011, 02:04:46 pm »
Ignore

My main goal in creating this thread was to see opposing sides of the argument, and that goal was accomplished, though it's disappointing to see people take such a negative and abrasive turn. Not every debate has to turn into a war of wards.

Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4476
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: September 14, 2011, 06:56:32 pm »
Ignore

I absolutely support it.  It goes with my general philosophical standpoint that people, as a matter of principle, should not be able to make stupid decisions, and if they do, the power should exist to correct them.
Are you serious? As a general philosophical standpoint, who's to say what's stupid and what isn't? That presumes omniscience on the part of those in power.
It's one thing to say that someone should be able to step in when someone's judgment has been compromised though an addiction.
But saying people aren't ever allowed to make stupid decisions is pretty much the definition of totalitarianism.

Well, I do not claim omniscience, but I can tell you that the effects of drugs such as these are greatly detrimental to one's health and general well-being. Why should I, in good conscience, allow a friend to do something that would hurt or harm themselves, that, if they were fully informed of the consequences, would not do? Such a belief is a logical extension of that. Totaliarianism? I'd call it Hobbesian paternalism.

Because different people prioritize different aspects of life and hold different subjective ideas on the benefits of taking risk upon themselves. What I'm saying is that you cannot impose your ideals of life on someone who wants to live a hedonistic one, that's fundamentally immoral and imposing your worldview on your friends. How would you like it if I forced everyone to smoke marijuana because I find it to be beneficial and well worth the risks and considered anyone who didn't smoke it to be lifeless pussies with no penchant for enjoying themselves?

What, should be ban storm chasing, surfing, snow boarding, driving cars and going outdoors because it could be detrimental to people's general health and well being at times? It's up to the individual to decide what is healthy for themselves and what is not, and what constitutes sufficient risk to stop their activity. Well in an ideal world it would be entirely up to the individual.
Logged

Thanks for all the fish!
Avelaval
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1291


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: September 18, 2011, 12:13:44 pm »
Ignore

No, no, no.  Bad idea.  Rehab does not stick unless the individual wants to be off the drug.  If the Jennifer Act had been in place, I'd conjecture that after exiting rehab Jennifer would have done the following:
1) Never talked to her parents again, and
2) Go right back to drinking, and doing more of it.
Logged

Signatures suck.
Mynheer Peeperkorn
Peeperkorn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1769
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #46 on: September 30, 2011, 08:53:12 am »
Ignore

I didn't know it was possible to die with an overdose of Alprazolam.
Logged

Link
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3445
View Profile
« Reply #47 on: October 01, 2011, 08:42:19 pm »
Ignore

What precisely does it do?

Increase costs and government regulation.
Logged

Insane quote of the year-

"Every aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
Link
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3445
View Profile
« Reply #48 on: October 01, 2011, 08:43:31 pm »
Ignore

I didn't know it was possible to die with an overdose of Alprazolam.

yup.

Alprazolam is a benzodiazepine.
Logged

Insane quote of the year-

"Every aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
Mynheer Peeperkorn
Peeperkorn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1769
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #49 on: October 01, 2011, 11:23:28 pm »
Ignore

I didn't know it was possible to die with an overdose of Alprazolam.

yup.

Alprazolam is a benzodiazepine.

I know, but it's not clonazepam.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines