Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 01, 2015, 03:18:23 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
| | | |-+  MT-PPP: All Republicans ahead of Obama
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MT-PPP: All Republicans ahead of Obama  (Read 2731 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36956
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09


View Profile
« on: November 17, 2010, 02:39:06 pm »
Ignore

Do you approve or disapprove of Barack Obama’s job performance?

41-54

...

Obama vs. Romney: 39-50
Obama vs. Huckabee: 41-51
Obama vs. Gingrich: 44-46
Obama vs. Palin: 45-47

...

Favorables:

Huckabee: 46-35
Romney: 38-39
Palin: 44-50
Gingrich: 34-47

...

Itīs a McCain+4 sample, with 38% Republicans, 32% Independents and 29% Democrats.

...

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MT_1117513.pdf
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8667
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2010, 02:40:40 pm »
Ignore

No sh!t.

MT has the right idea about Romney.  They're the best state.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36956
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2010, 02:42:58 pm »
Ignore

No sh!t.

MT has the right idea about Romney.  They're the best state.

Yeah, Mitt Romney also won there in 2008.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8667
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2010, 02:47:05 pm »
Ignore

Oh, it has plenty of Mormons, but Ron Paul came close behind in second.
Logged
Whacker77
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 763


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2010, 03:02:45 pm »
Ignore

Once again the favorables indicate the top four Republicans are hopelessly flawed.
Logged
Ben Romney
Hillary2012
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 395
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2010, 06:32:12 pm »
Ignore

If you want to be sure that Obama willw in re-election nominate Sarah Palin

Mitt Romney looks really good

but I would prefer Thune
Logged

I was anti-Obama before it was cool
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13861
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2010, 07:15:35 pm »
Ignore

Oh, it has plenty of Mormons, but Ron Paul came close behind in second.

It's only 3 or 4% Mormon, though I suppose "plenty" is subjective.

Ron Paul performed well due to what may have been the most restrictive caucus in the nation. He lost Montana's primary by over 50 points.
Logged

Ody
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 913
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2010, 07:19:05 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Q10 Who did you vote for President in 2008?

John McCain................................................... 47%
Barack Obama................................................ 43%
Someone else/Don't remember ...................... 10%

lol
Logged
feeblepizza
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2947
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2010, 07:26:32 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?
Logged

Ody
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 913
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2010, 07:28:34 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6707


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2010, 07:29:27 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Or they don't want to admit to a pollster who they voted for.
Logged
Senator Polnut
polnut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15644
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2010, 07:30:13 pm »
Ignore

I don't see how this is "wonderful news" Obama came close, but still didn't win in a SHOCKING year for the GOP... this is returning the presidential status quo for MT.

Those 3 EV were never being factored in.
Logged


Dogma is a comfortable thing, it saves you from thought - Sir Robert Menzies
Ody
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 913
United States


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2010, 07:31:52 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Or they don't want to admit to a pollster who they voted for.

Hence why "forgot" was in quotation marks.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15075
Finland


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2010, 08:50:03 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Don't forget Ron Paul, who finished well ahead of Nader and Barr in Montana despite running no campaign and unsuccessfully requesting his name be removed from the ballot entirely. Wink

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.
Logged

Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30343
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2010, 08:52:13 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

Roll Eyes Sure, keep telling yourself that.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15075
Finland


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2010, 08:56:14 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

Roll Eyes Sure, keep telling yourself that.

Keep telling myself what? You're saying Paul wouldn't have done any better as an actual candidate as opposed to being a non-candidate? Roll Eyes
Logged

Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29920
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2010, 08:58:19 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

If a candidate with unusually devoted support got 1-in-46 votes when his name was on the ballot?  I mean, wonder away, but.
Logged

n/c
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines