Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 01, 2014, 11:16:27 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Which of these elections were stolen?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Poll
Question: Stolen?
1824   -28 (12.1%)
1876   -72 (31.2%)
1888   -19 (8.2%)
1960   -29 (12.6%)
2000   -63 (27.3%)
2004   -9 (3.9%)
None of them   -11 (4.8%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 105

Author Topic: Which of these elections were stolen?  (Read 4962 times)
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6523
United States
View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2011, 02:31:45 pm »
Ignore

1824 and 1876 were the only ones truly stolen.  2000, in my opinion, was not stolen by Bush so much as handed to him by the courts.  The others were just close elections.
Logged

Goodbye
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3499
United States


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2011, 07:45:11 pm »
Ignore

1876, and I think 1960.
Logged
Username MechaRFK
RFK
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1275
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: November 05, 2011, 11:47:00 am »
Ignore

1876, and I think 1960.

Why 1960?
Logged



 
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3499
United States


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: November 05, 2011, 05:06:25 pm »
Ignore


If you look back there were a lot of odd elections in Texas and Illinois back then. You add in the mob and what a crook JFK's dad was, it wouldn't shock me to find out that election was stolen.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28323
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2011, 11:50:50 pm »

How the heck do the totals for 1876 and NOTA not equal the number of votes.   It was the most clearly stolen election in U.S. history.  If 1876 wasn't stolen, none of them were.
Logged

My November ballot:
Ervin(I) Gov.
Sellers(D) Lt. Gov.
Hammond(R) Sec. of State
Diggs(D) Att. Gen.
Herbert(D) Comptroller Gen.
Spearman(R) Supt. of Education
DeFelice(American) Commissioner of Agriculture
Hutto(D) US Sen (full)
Scott(R) US Sen (special)
Geddings(Labor) US House SC-2
Quinn(R) SC House District 69
Yes: Amendment 1 (Gen. Assembly may allow and regulate charity raffles)
No: Amendment 2 (end election of the Adjutant General)
Nagas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1713
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2011, 04:55:43 pm »
Ignore

1876 was evidently stolen. Hayes did not win 3 states of the Democratic solid south, they were handed to him via the corrupt bargain.

 1960 and 2000 are debatable.
Logged

Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15194
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2011, 06:02:52 pm »
Ignore

To everybody voting 2000......

You may hate the facts, and maybe the photo-shopping of fake headlines in Michael Moore films has brainwashed you.. but...

The New York Times (essentially the media arm of the Democratic party) spent millions of dollars to recount every single ballot in Florida.. The looked at every single overvote, undervote, illegal vote..

With all their heart and soul they wanted it to be true, but it just wasn't... Bush actually did win Florida...

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/12VOTE.html

Acomprehensive review of the uncounted Florida ballots from last year's presidential election reveals that George W. Bush would have won even if the United States Supreme Court had allowed the statewide manual recount of the votes that the Florida Supreme Court had ordered to go forward.

Contrary to what many partisans of former Vice President Al Gore have charged, the United States Supreme Court did not award an election to Mr. Bush that otherwise would have been won by Mr. Gore. A close examination of the ballots found that Mr. Bush would have retained a slender margin over Mr. Gore if the Florida court's order to recount more than 43,000 ballots had not been reversed by the United States Supreme Court.

Even under the strategy that Mr. Gore pursued at the beginning of the Florida standoff filing suit to force hand recounts in four predominantly Democratic counties Mr. Bush would have kept his lead, according to the ballot review conducted for a consortium of news organizations.


Um, except the very next few paragraphs, which for some reason you failed to quote, give the rest of the story....

"But the consortium, looking at a broader group of rejected ballots than those covered in the court decisions, 175,010 in all, found that Mr. Gore might have won if the courts had ordered a full statewide recount of all the rejected ballots. This also assumes that county canvassing boards would have reached the same conclusions about the disputed ballots that the consortium's independent observers did. The findings indicate that Mr. Gore might have eked out a victory if he had pursued in court a course like the one he publicly advocated when he called on the state to "count all the votes."

In addition, the review found statistical support for the complaints of many voters, particularly elderly Democrats in Palm Beach County, who said in interviews after the election that confusing ballot designs may have led them to spoil their ballots by voting for more than one candidate.

More than 113,000 voters cast ballots for two or more presidential candidates. Of those, 75,000 chose Mr. Gore and a minor candidate; 29,000 chose Mr. Bush and a minor candidate. Because there was no clear indication of what the voters intended, those numbers were not included in the consortium's final tabulations."
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15194
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2011, 06:18:50 pm »
Ignore

So, I guess if by "stolen" you mean that the Supreme Court won the election for Bush, then technically it was not stolen; Gore's legal strategy was pretty crappy and thus he still would have lost even if he had gotten the count he wanted.

But the evidence is pretty clear that a statewide manual recount of votes in Florida would have given the victory to Gore. That to me is sufficient to meet the definition of "stolen" as the will of the people of the state was clearly not reflected in the results.
Logged
Indy Prez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 281
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: December 01, 2011, 01:49:04 pm »
Ignore

1876 was outright stolen by the GOP when Grant admitted Colorado into the Union and appointed the state's electors, otherwise it would have been D 184-182 R and Sammy T in the White House.

1824 was stolen if you consider the Constitution and the electoral process it outlines to be meaningless (the House rules).

2000 was stolen by a power-hungry GOP who felt entitled to the White House after eight years controlling congress.

2004 was not stolen, although the previous statement woud argue the opposite :/

1960 wasn't stolen, although both parties committed voter fraud in Illinois (Dems) and Texas (GOP), kennedy still would have won.
Logged

GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7235
United States


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: December 01, 2011, 04:29:03 pm »
Ignore

1876 was outright stolen by the GOP when Grant admitted Colorado into the Union and appointed the state's electors, otherwise it would have been D 184-182 R and Sammy T in the White House.

1824 was stolen if you consider the Constitution and the electoral process it outlines to be meaningless (the House rules).

2000 was stolen by a power-hungry GOP who felt entitled to the White House after eight years controlling congress.

2004 was not stolen, although the previous statement woud argue the opposite :/

1960 wasn't stolen, although both parties committed voter fraud in Illinois (Dems) and Texas (GOP), kennedy still would have won.

Well, your an independent, but its obvious which way you lean.
Logged

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=195483.new#new
the birth of modern america & onward election Frederick Douglas becomes the 1st African American president of the united states when he wins election to the office in 1892 only 30 years after the height of slavery in the United States. He narrowly wins reelection in 1896 against William Jennings Bryan. Douglas runs again in 1900 and even indicated his interest in a 4th run in 1904 but Grover Cleveland wins the 1900 election.
Skill and Chance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1960
View Profile
« Reply #35 on: December 01, 2011, 11:06:12 pm »
Ignore

How the heck do the totals for 1876 and NOTA not equal the number of votes.   It was the most clearly stolen election in U.S. history.  If 1876 wasn't stolen, none of them were.

The Democrats had a vote fraud operation going that likely "stole" several Southern states for them.  Tilden's PV win wasn't exactly fair and square. 
Logged
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37087


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: December 08, 2011, 06:30:48 pm »
Ignore

1824 wasn't stolen. No candidate won a required number of electoral votes to get elected and, constitutionally, House of Representatives had to make a final decision.
Logged
tb78
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4689
United States


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: December 29, 2011, 10:16:59 pm »
Ignore

1876 and 1824 had screwed up outcomes, but the rest are not, the guy who was destined to win won. Get over it folks, life's tough sometimes
Logged
MIKESOWELL
Rookie
*
Posts: 23
View Profile
« Reply #38 on: February 07, 2012, 07:36:30 pm »
Ignore

1824 possibly, 1876 definitely, 1960 possibly, and 2000 probably. The rest, in my opinion, were won fair and square.
Logged
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31029
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P

View Profile
« Reply #39 on: February 08, 2012, 02:23:45 pm »
Ignore

1876 and 1824 had screwed up outcomes, but the rest are not, the guy who was destined to win won. Get over it folks, life's tough sometimes

Nobody is "destined to win" (as long as you believe in free will).
Logged

Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.

It really is.



"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
freefair
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 699
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #40 on: February 12, 2012, 09:46:02 am »
Ignore

2000 was stolen- A whole half percentage point between the two candidates PV ,  and Florida could have actually gone for Gore anyway, the recount was unfairly halted in a morally corrupt Supreme court descision.
Logged

If you're centrist to right wing do follow this link and participate in this timelime poll!!
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186153.0
PM- Ecn +4.95 Soc -4.95
Pragmatically libertarian. Centrist by US standards, Tory in UK.
Sasquatch
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 805
View Profile
« Reply #41 on: February 12, 2012, 07:08:05 pm »
Ignore

2000
Logged
tb78
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4689
United States


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: February 12, 2012, 07:36:07 pm »
Ignore

2000 was stolen- A whole half percentage point between the two candidates PV ,  and Florida could have actually gone for Gore anyway, the recount was unfairly halted in a morally corrupt Supreme court descision.

I agree the recount was handled wrong, the state should have had a do over election day with the 4 main candidates and let the results come out that way.
Logged
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7235
United States


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: April 03, 2012, 07:25:43 am »
Ignore

2000 was stolen- A whole half percentage point between the two candidates PV ,  and Florida could have actually gone for Gore anyway, the recount was unfairly halted in a morally corrupt Supreme court descision.

And for democrats, it the supreme court votes that health care is unconstitutional, then that will be a "morally corrupt" Supreme court decision too. Republicans have lost elections too, yet we don't jump to calling them "morally corrupt."
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 06:05:46 pm by Cheesy Grits »Logged

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=195483.new#new
the birth of modern america & onward election Frederick Douglas becomes the 1st African American president of the united states when he wins election to the office in 1892 only 30 years after the height of slavery in the United States. He narrowly wins reelection in 1896 against William Jennings Bryan. Douglas runs again in 1900 and even indicated his interest in a 4th run in 1904 but Grover Cleveland wins the 1900 election.
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 922
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #44 on: April 03, 2012, 06:03:47 pm »
Ignore

The one with the Unicorn Nominee winning EVs Wink
Logged

OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9927
United States


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: April 03, 2012, 08:38:26 pm »
Ignore

I'm sure because W Bush had his father's name and 6/9 SCrt justices were Reagan or his dad's, which his father served under, added an extra partisan component to the 2000 election being stolen.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines