Averaged? That makes no sense. Since when do we do that? I think we should go with either Perry or Romney numbers depending on who we think is favoured to win.
(I'd personally go with Romney, simply since we all know Perry is way behind anyway)
Yeah, just add the one who's ahead in the state's primary.
In this case it is Romney.
I honestly would rather we just stick with one candidate, preferably Romney.
Otherwise the map's going to look really weird with Republicans very competitive in some "toss-up" states while trailing big in others, the one Perry lead in.
