What should the highest income tax bracket rate be? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:02:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What should the highest income tax bracket rate be? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Regarding an income tax, I think it should be:
#1
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 25%
 
#2
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 50%
 
#3
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 75%
 
#4
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 100%
 
#5
a flat system with a rate between 1% and 25%
 
#6
a flat system with a rate between 26% and 50%
 
#7
a flat system with a rate between 51% and 75%
 
#8
a flat system with a rate between 76% and 100%
 
#9
there should be no income tax
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 67

Author Topic: What should the highest income tax bracket rate be?  (Read 6627 times)
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« on: October 16, 2011, 09:32:41 AM »

If we're going to have a progressive tax structure, I say we eliminate the bracket system and replace it with a continuous function to determine the rate. I don't think having piecewise discontinuities is a good idea and creates unnecessary distortions, especially when we could just as easily use some other kind of function.

I've always thought about doing that, but I don't know what the exact effects would be, if any.

People need to use calculus to find out how much tax they owe.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2011, 08:25:47 AM »

I think economic research tends to point to rates above 50% or so being rather pointless, in the sense that they actually lose the government revenue. The only real point of them is to make people feel better.

Actually no, the point to high marginal rates is neither raising revenue or 'making people feel better', it is to try to reduce the power of the elite.


Heaven forbid Bill Gates have more money for his foundation. I assume that's not what you mean by the "power of the elite", but I'm not sure exactly what it might be and what is so dangerous about it. If it's to do with political or media influence, things like campaign finance laws seem far more effective.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2011, 09:57:24 PM »

I think economic research tends to point to rates above 50% or so being rather pointless, in the sense that they actually lose the government revenue. The only real point of them is to make people feel better.

Actually no, the point to high marginal rates is neither raising revenue or 'making people feel better', it is to try to reduce the power of the elite.


lol. It isn't, because it doesn't. The traditional elites were a lot more powerful back in those days than they are now - largely because they have the resources to game a complicated tax code.

The current tax code is incredibly complicated and full of loopholes.

My impression is in spite of this, it was even more complicated back in the day (see e.g. the Tax Reform Act of 1986).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.