What should the highest income tax bracket rate be? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:06:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What should the highest income tax bracket rate be? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Regarding an income tax, I think it should be:
#1
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 25%
 
#2
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 50%
 
#3
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 75%
 
#4
a progressive system with rates between 1% and 100%
 
#5
a flat system with a rate between 1% and 25%
 
#6
a flat system with a rate between 26% and 50%
 
#7
a flat system with a rate between 51% and 75%
 
#8
a flat system with a rate between 76% and 100%
 
#9
there should be no income tax
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 67

Author Topic: What should the highest income tax bracket rate be?  (Read 6665 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« on: September 27, 2011, 07:08:11 PM »

1.) Move it to Econ board.

2.) Deadweight loss is approximately taxation squared so from a deadweightloss minimization perspective it is better to have a lot of small taxes as opposed to one big tax.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2011, 11:19:24 PM »

If we're going to have a progressive tax structure, I say we eliminate the bracket system and replace it with a continuous function to determine the rate. I don't think having piecewise discontinuities is a good idea and creates unnecessary distortions, especially when we could just as easily use some other kind of function.

I've always thought about doing that, but I don't know what the exact effects would be, if any.

Like an econometric formula?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2011, 03:06:36 PM »

You get big deadweight loss problems with tax rates north of 40%.

It's better to have a lot of smaller taxes. VAT, Sales, SS, Income, Sin, etc than to have a single high tax.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2011, 05:45:51 PM »

You get big deadweight loss problems with tax rates north of 40%.

Why is that in particular?

Because, it's kind of a mathematical identity, but deadweight loss increases at a rate of (taxation)^2.

Though I should rephrase, DWL wont occur, more likely the case you'll get evasion.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.