Our prayers might be answered: Christie to decide on 2012 bid. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:16:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Our prayers might be answered: Christie to decide on 2012 bid. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Our prayers might be answered: Christie to decide on 2012 bid.  (Read 18811 times)
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


« on: September 23, 2011, 07:18:58 PM »

All this Hamlet-like behavior by Christie is really tiresome, not to mention that I'm running out of fat jokes.

Is he being indecisive? We have one article with only unnamed sources (from Newsmax). Other reports have popped up before, but it's always been something that happens sporadically in conservative publications. Weighed against Christie's claim that he would rather "kill himself," I think I'll go with the man's word.

With McCotter's withdrawal, the right-wing intelligentsia are grasping at straws. No surprise.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2011, 10:40:08 AM »

Christie is basically a more economically-orientated version of Rudy Giuliani.

No way. I'm sure that the expectations for Christie are overblown, but Giuliani's status as a national hero running for President is unique in contemporary politics. Giuliani's stature was like that of a general returning from war - an Eisenhower, a William Henry Harrison, a Zachary Taylor. There is no other politician in either party who could do so well despite being so out of line with the base on basic, important issues.


(The comparison isn't a total bust, don't mistake me, but Giuliani's candidacy is really different from anything that we've seen.)
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2011, 02:45:43 PM »

To be clear. Jon Huntsman is practically irrelevant to this campaign, and anything written by his acolytes is likely to be so heavily biased that its connection to reality is loose and largely coincidental. Call me crazy

Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2011, 06:48:18 PM »
« Edited: September 25, 2011, 06:50:10 PM by Averroës Nix »

To be clear. Jon Huntsman is practically irrelevant to this campaign, and anything written by his acolytes is likely to be so heavily biased that its connection to reality is loose and largely coincidental. Call me crazy

Crazy? No. Missing the big picture? Definitely. You can't dismiss the strategists' argument because she is a Huntsman adviser, especially when she has no agenda. Huntsman isn't exactly on Romney's tail in Florida.

Huntsman has repeatedly emphasized the importance of Florida to his campaign, so I wouldn't be so quick to say that she doesn't have an agenda. (Besides, anyone affiliated with a campaign has an agenda by definition - getting their candidate elected.)

If I seemed to be overstating the case slightly, that was intentional. I was parodying Huntsman's famous tweet regarding global warming.




Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.