Official Discussion Thread for Tonight's GOP Presidential Debate
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:52:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Official Discussion Thread for Tonight's GOP Presidential Debate
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21
Author Topic: Official Discussion Thread for Tonight's GOP Presidential Debate  (Read 30860 times)
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #475 on: October 11, 2011, 09:31:44 PM »

They just "fact checked" the 999 plan, and said it comes up with "only" 2 Trillion. only 200 Billion less than current revenue? that's a lot closer to target than I thought.

I'm almost positive that I read a much more comprehensive analysis somewhere that estimated his plan would raise only about half of the revenue we currently do, as well as the fact that our projected revenue for the 2012 budget was 2.6 trillion, not 2.2 trillion. Which would make even that generous analysis quite far off what is already far too little revenue to cover our expenditures already anyway.
Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #476 on: October 11, 2011, 09:32:07 PM »

They just "fact checked" the 999 plan, and said it comes up with "only" 2 Trillion. only 200 Billion less than current revenue? that's a lot closer to target than I thought.

The "fact checking" on that was some of the laziest reporting I have ever seen.

Better than the Romney "fact-checking", which just quoted the CBO.
Logged
Wonkish1
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,203


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #477 on: October 11, 2011, 09:35:31 PM »

They just "fact checked" the 999 plan, and said it comes up with "only" 2 Trillion. only 200 Billion less than current revenue? that's a lot closer to target than I thought.

The "fact checking" on that was some of the laziest reporting I have ever seen.

No $hit. It was particularly bad that they used the original CBO scoring for ObamaCare that was jam packed full of accounting gimmicks and cuts that they just reversed in a subsequent bill. Now every single cost scoring of Obamacare has it well beyond $1 trillion over the next 10 years and rising fast.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #478 on: October 11, 2011, 09:35:42 PM »

They just "fact checked" the 999 plan, and said it comes up with "only" 2 Trillion. only 200 Billion less than current revenue? that's a lot closer to target than I thought.
CNN says it brings in $1.768T.

Cain needs to show how his plan actually adds up instead of just saying his secret group of economists say so so we should trust them. And the one economist that Cain says analyzed his plan is actually not an economist, but a "wealth manager" for Wells Fargo.

Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,500
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #479 on: October 11, 2011, 09:40:59 PM »

So I'm predicting Romney being the nominee and him winning the General 300-238 as a bold prediction.

We'll see how silly this looks in due time.
Logged
Wonkish1
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,203


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #480 on: October 11, 2011, 09:45:09 PM »

Nah, $2 trillion territory sounds about right. But just think about that once.

The average middle class family pays an effective income tax rate in the teens, plus another 13% in payroll(employer and employee side is truly paid for by the employee), plus 15% capital gains(soon to be 20%), plus 35% top corporate tax rate, plus duties/fees/misc/etc.

And you lower the tax rates to 9, 9, 9 and you get pretty much the same revenue. That should annoy some Dems on here. And the sales tax increase is netted out against a fall in payroll and income taxes so barely anybody could possibly experience any sizeable increase in their tax burden.


But as all the GOP candidates said and I've said for a long time, if you give congress another tax rate to mess with they'll make you regret it.
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #481 on: October 11, 2011, 09:50:15 PM »

So I'm predicting Romney being the nominee and him winning the General 300-238 as a bold prediction.

We'll see how silly this looks in due time.

I agree with you on both accounts, though we'll see on the 300 ev. My prediction is that it will be lower, barring an economic collapse then Obama's in 2008, but higher than Bush's in 2004.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #482 on: October 11, 2011, 09:53:54 PM »

First to last, with grade...
Romney-A-Good performance, was on his game, beat back attacks. Sounded like the front runner.

Paul-A-Still my favorite, and he derailed the Cain train tonight. He shined on the FED issue, and will experiance a minor poll bump.

Huntsman-A-Another good one. Was funny, and performed well. He obivously has enough experiance for any cabinet position availible.

Gingrich-B-Another good debate, but he did not get alot of questions, and really echoed everyone else.

Perry-B-Best debate so far,  but was boring, and could not break through Romney. He is finished, and is now going to be the Rudy of 2012.

Bachmann-B-The annoying cackle killed me, and she didnt bring anything new, but she over all performed better, sounded more serious, and still has a shot at rebouding in the polls.

Cain-B-He performed well, but the Cain train is going to end. He got angry when challenged, and came off cocky. His 999 plan is absolute bull s**t. But, he has a shot, is a strong debator overall, and performed well enough to earn a B.

Santorum-F-F does not only stand for Frothy, he has to whine for attention, and always brings a way to pick a fight with someone else, or blame "teh gayez." He cannot do any worse at this point, and needs to drop out and go back to the Senate.

Overall, best debate so far. Everyone was on their game. I hope Bloomberg does it again Smiley

Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,541
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #483 on: October 11, 2011, 11:19:19 PM »

Everyone in the audience I spoke to thought Cain won. LOL. I totally thought Cain won!?

ANYWAY, Michele Bachmann is the nicest of them all..actually, so sweet. Walking around campus, she's so accommodating. Huntsman is definitely the most interesting candidate in a one-on-one setting.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #484 on: October 11, 2011, 11:30:12 PM »

I feel bad that I missed this.  The roundtable format sounded like a lot of fun.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #485 on: October 12, 2011, 12:47:54 AM »

Is there an internet link where I can watch it online? I unfortunately missed it when it was live.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #486 on: October 12, 2011, 01:34:14 AM »

So, what did happen in this debate ?

Can anyone give me a short summary ?

Don't want to read 30+ pages ... Tongue
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,500
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #487 on: October 12, 2011, 01:41:46 AM »

So, what did happen in this debate ?

Can anyone give me a short summary ?

Don't want to read 30+ pages ... Tongue

Nothing happened that wasn't going to happen anyway.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #488 on: October 12, 2011, 01:42:42 AM »

So, what did happen in this debate ?

Can anyone give me a short summary ?

Don't want to read 30+ pages ... Tongue

Nothing happened that wasn't going to happen anyway.

OK, so who won ?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #489 on: October 12, 2011, 03:34:58 AM »

Is there an internet link where I can watch it online? I unfortunately missed it when it was live.

It's all on Youtube.
Logged
Peeperkorn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,987
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #490 on: October 12, 2011, 05:00:29 AM »

Ron Paul to Herman Cain at Bloomberg Debate: "Spoken Like a True Insider! Greenspan was a DISASTER"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTEERUGKZuM

Give 'em hell, Ron.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #491 on: October 12, 2011, 06:52:47 AM »

Paul owned Cain on the Federal Reserve.
Cain's 9-9-9 plan is atrocious and many people will see that unfold in the coming weeks. That's his whole campaign. Sales tax and income tax... yuck.
Romney is obsessed with China. He also admitted to favoring bailing out the banks, but he tried to spin it like a frisbee.
Santorum is probably the one person who sounds like a douche if he simply said the word 'hi.'
Newt looked liked Paul's buddy/ sidekick (has anyone else noticed this).
Bachmann and Romney clearly have a deal together.
Perry looked lost and confused.
Huntsman can't stop telling people that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
Logged
Wonkish1
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,203


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #492 on: October 12, 2011, 07:07:36 AM »

Paul owned Cain on the Federal Reserve.
Cain's 9-9-9 plan is atrocious and many people will see that unfold in the coming weeks. That's his whole campaign. Sales tax and income tax... yuck.
Romney is obsessed with China. He also admitted to favoring bailing out the banks, but he tried to spin it like a frisbee.
Santorum is probably the one person who sounds like a douche if he simply said the word 'hi.'
Newt looked liked Paul's buddy/ sidekick (has anyone else noticed this).
Bachmann and Romney clearly have a deal together.
Perry looked lost and confused.
Huntsman can't stop telling people that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

Newt has been a price stability focused monetarist(Hawk) for a long time. Libertarians aren't the only ones that have focused on this issue. A lot of conservatives including myself have really honed in on the Fed.

The first elected leader I remember publicly attacking the Fed's response to the crisis wasn't Ron Paul. It was Norm Coleman in mid 2008 well before Lehman, AIG, Freddie, Fannie, etc.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #493 on: October 12, 2011, 09:19:21 AM »

Paul owned Cain on the Federal Reserve.
Cain's 9-9-9 plan is atrocious and many people will see that unfold in the coming weeks. That's his whole campaign. Sales tax and income tax... yuck.
Romney is obsessed with China. He also admitted to favoring bailing out the banks, but he tried to spin it like a frisbee.
Santorum is probably the one person who sounds like a douche if he simply said the word 'hi.'
Newt looked liked Paul's buddy/ sidekick (has anyone else noticed this).
Bachmann and Romney clearly have a deal together.
Perry looked lost and confused.
Huntsman can't stop telling people that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

Newt has been a price stability focused monetarist(Hawk) for a long time. Libertarians aren't the only ones that have focused on this issue. A lot of conservatives including myself have really honed in on the Fed.

The first elected leader I remember publicly attacking the Fed's response to the crisis wasn't Ron Paul. It was Norm Coleman in mid 2008 well before Lehman, AIG, Freddie, Fannie, etc.

Ron Paul didn't attack the Fed before 2008? What planet do you live on? I wasn't a Paul supporter then (McCain) and I still knew he did. New was buddy buddy with him during the debate, after the debate (they were talking), and he mentioned Paul later on, when there were a bunch of Paul signs behind him.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #494 on: October 12, 2011, 03:06:44 PM »

Paul owned Cain on the Federal Reserve.
Cain's 9-9-9 plan is atrocious and many people will see that unfold in the coming weeks. That's his whole campaign. Sales tax and income tax... yuck.
Romney is obsessed with China. He also admitted to favoring bailing out the banks, but he tried to spin it like a frisbee.
Santorum is probably the one person who sounds like a douche if he simply said the word 'hi.'
Newt looked liked Paul's buddy/ sidekick (has anyone else noticed this).
Bachmann and Romney clearly have a deal together.
Perry looked lost and confused.
Huntsman can't stop telling people that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

Newt has been a price stability focused monetarist(Hawk) for a long time. Libertarians aren't the only ones that have focused on this issue. A lot of conservatives including myself have really honed in on the Fed.

The first elected leader I remember publicly attacking the Fed's response to the crisis wasn't Ron Paul. It was Norm Coleman in mid 2008 well before Lehman, AIG, Freddie, Fannie, etc.
First of all, Conservative. Rudy Giuliuani, John McCain, and George Bush are not Conservative, neither is Norm Coleman. They are Neocons, which only has the last part of the name in common. Ron Paul has been on the FED for 30 years now. Gingrich has a record that is to be admired, and he is my 2nd choice behind Paul,  for that. If your a Neoconservative, come out and say it.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #495 on: October 12, 2011, 03:32:11 PM »

That was an epic smackdown.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #496 on: October 12, 2011, 08:57:10 PM »

Oh dear, we are misappropriating the word neo-con, again. Roll Eyes

Logged
Peeperkorn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,987
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #497 on: October 13, 2011, 03:41:23 AM »

Oh dear, we are misappropriating the word neo-con, again. Roll Eyes



Epistemologically speaking, neoconservativism only exists as a Paradigm in International Relations Theory.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,691
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #498 on: October 13, 2011, 07:32:09 AM »

Oh dear, we are misappropriating the word neo-con, again. Roll Eyes



Epistemologically speaking, neoconservativism only exists as a Paradigm in International Relations Theory.
huh? Neoconservatism was an approach to domestic policy before it was an approach to international relations.
Logged
Peeperkorn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,987
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #499 on: October 13, 2011, 08:01:14 AM »

Oh dear, we are misappropriating the word neo-con, again. Roll Eyes



Epistemologically speaking, neoconservativism only exists as a Paradigm in International Relations Theory.
huh? Neoconservatism was an approach to domestic policy before it was an approach to international relations.

Not as a serious political systemic theory.

Politics =/= Policies.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 13 queries.