And, like Lopez Portillo he has a megalomaniac idea of his own self, which makes him especially bad (ideologically, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas might not be that different, but he is a much nicer person, not given to delusions of personal grandeur).
why should pop-psychoanalytic broad brushstrokes such as the above matter? is there not an alternative locus, perhaps turned on its head with all of the stupid research showing narcissists may be good for organizations... using the same characteristics to choose leaders as we choose our friends runs the risk of at best being
non sequitur... it's what the GWB campaigns in '00 and '04 explicitly tried to make us do: "who would you rather have a beer with?"
