Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:39:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate?  (Read 2208 times)
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216
« on: October 12, 2011, 11:42:10 PM »
« edited: October 12, 2011, 11:43:56 PM by Jacobtm »
If Medicare was simply expanded to cover all Americans, would there be any constitutional problem with that?

If Medicare is constitutional, I don't see what the issue could be with simply including everyone, constitutionally speaking.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.