Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:52:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would a single-payer system be less constitutionally problematic than a mandate?  (Read 2200 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


« on: October 14, 2011, 12:17:10 PM »

Depends on what you mean by single-payer.  If doctors were forced to be part of the single-payer system, then no it would be of doubtful constitutional validity.  But Medicare doesn't operate that way, and an all ages Medicare would likely withstand constitutional scrutiny unless we got a bunch of strict constructionists on the court who would also strike down pretty much the entire welfare state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.