Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2015, 06:06:36 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  Free Trade vs Protectionism
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Poll
Question: Which do you believe is the best economic policy.
Free Trade   -43 (71.7%)
Protectionism   -17 (28.3%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Free Trade vs Protectionism  (Read 6934 times)
futurepres
Full Member
***
Posts: 113
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: -5.13

View Profile
« on: October 23, 2011, 09:10:02 pm »
Ignore

Which do you believe is the best?

Free Trade: Trading with other countries and being able to outsource or get products from other countries.

Protectionism: Trading within one nation and discouraging trade with other countries.
Logged
Senator Polnut
polnut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15112
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2011, 09:12:16 pm »
Ignore

Neither works in a pure form.
Logged


Dogma is a comfortable thing, it saves you from thought - Sir Robert Menzies
futurepres
Full Member
***
Posts: 113
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.97, S: -5.13

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2011, 09:19:01 pm »
Ignore

Then vote on what you believe the majority portion is in the best working combination.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8277
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2011, 09:47:35 pm »
Ignore

Considering that protectionism is probably one of the single worst economic policies there is, it's pretty easy to go with free trade.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36288
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2011, 09:51:58 pm »
Ignore

if it weren't for protectionism the US would still be heavily agrarian with some merchants along the coasts selling finished goods from Britain.
Logged

“They cheated us again and again, made decisions behind our back, presenting us with completed facts. That’s the way it was with the expansion of NATO in the East, with the deployment of military infrastructure at our borders. They always told us the same thing: 'Well, this doesn't concern you.'" -Vladimir Putin
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17033
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

P

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2011, 10:13:19 pm »
Ignore

There is a perfectly fair and acceptable middle ground. As Polnut said..

Neither works in a pure form.
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38968
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2011, 10:48:09 pm »
Ignore

I am for freedom of movement in all its forms, but (at risk of cliché) trade cannot be free if workers are unfree.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14807


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2011, 10:57:42 pm »
Ignore

Free trade, but not unilateral disarmament.  Trade isn't free when South Korea and China have massive tariffs against US products.
Logged

Snowstalker   mikado is content with only questions
23:03   Snowstalker   questions never helped anyone
23:03   Snowstalker   only answers
Dr. Cynic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12131
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2011, 12:21:11 am »
Ignore

I believe in fair trade. Free trade often gives up too much and protectionism gives up too little and frequently pisses other countries off. Fair trade is the only acceptable answer.
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27243


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2011, 03:05:52 am »
Ignore

The correct short answer is that free trade is good and the way to go.

Once you study it more in-depth there is, of course, a longer somewhat more complicated answer butit is still roughly the same.

Trade restrictions can really only be argued as a special interest position and under the assumption of unequal power distribution, which is hard to justify on principle (it basically amounts to "me screwing you over because I can")
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22408
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2011, 10:49:51 am »
Ignore

Considering that protectionism is probably one of the single worst economic policies there is, it's pretty easy to go with free trade.
Logged
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33063
France


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2011, 12:16:05 pm »
Ignore

I strongly support free trade in most circumstances, and in general wish to make tarifs as low as possible.  However, this has to be done gradually and pragmatically, and not to shoved it down the throat of developing countries like the WTO has done for decades.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12903
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2011, 02:39:10 pm »
Ignore

I believe in fair trade. Free trade often gives up too much and protectionism gives up too little and frequently pisses other countries off. Fair trade is the only acceptable answer.
I'm not sure that answers anything. If two countries want to trade freely, that could be considered fair. If two countries want to be protectionist against each other, I guess that could be considered fair too.
Logged

Stone Cold Conservative
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14318
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 24, 2011, 03:42:05 pm »
Ignore

Four votes for The Great Depression Protectionism?

Yuck.
Logged



Austin 3:16 says I just whooped your ass!
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18974
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -8.71, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2011, 04:12:34 pm »
Ignore

Neither works in a pure form.

In general, I feel that free trade is acceptable when both nations have strong regulations and labor protections which would mean no real advantage coming from shipping jobs from one country to the other. However, being in a manufacturing state, I must say that pure free trade as the globalists want is downright dangerous.
Logged

Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4123
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2011, 04:31:12 pm »
Ignore

Free trade.  I find it kind of odd that protectionism is even considered in the global market we have now.  Free trade ultimately benefits the consumer.  Plus, The local "Made in America" store wouldn't have nearly the sales it has under a "We lost our job to Mexicans/Chinese" society Tongue
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38968
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2011, 09:23:55 pm »
Ignore

Free trade.  I find it kind of odd that protectionism is even considered in the global market we have now.  Free trade ultimately benefits the consumer.  Plus, The local "Made in America" store wouldn't have nearly the sales it has under a "We lost our job to Mexicans/Chinese" society Tongue

It benefits the consumer, but the citizen does not only exist as a consumer.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1701


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2011, 08:28:34 am »
Ignore

Free trade. It's mutually beneficial under almost any circumstances, and at least efficient on net for the rest.

A compelling, simple argument: The Iowa Car Crop.

Quote
David’s observation is that there are two technologies for producing automobiles in America.  One is to manufacture them in Detroit, and the other is to grow them in Iowa.  Everybody knows about the first technology; let me tell you about the second.  First, you plant seeds, which are the raw material from which automobiles are constructed.  You wait a few months until wheat appears.  Then you harvest the wheat, load it onto ships, and said the ships eastward into the Pacific Ocean.  After a few months, the ships reappear with Toyotas on them.

International trade is nothing but a form of technology.  The fact that there is a place called Japan, with people and factories, is quite irrelevant to Americans’ well-being.  To analyze trade policies, we might as well assume that Japan is a giant machine with mysterious inner workings that convert wheat into cars.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 08:30:48 am by Nichlemn »Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22836
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2011, 08:42:44 am »
Ignore

People that treat economics emotionally can't comprehend the subtleties of that kind of thing.
Logged

PR
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5979
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2011, 06:03:06 pm »
Ignore

People that treat economics emotionally can't comprehend the subtleties of that kind of thing.

People who treat human beings as "consumers" have a bigger problem, IMO.
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58052
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2011, 06:19:21 pm »
Ignore

Neither term accurately describes any plausible contemporary reality.
Logged

"Whatsoever Aristotle may have thought of this, I do not care"

William of Occam
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24665
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.83

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2011, 06:23:07 pm »
Ignore

Considering that protectionism is probably one of the single worst economic policies there is, it's pretty easy to go with free trade.
Logged


Reaction from ISIS:

Oh Crap

Reaction from JCL:

Tea Party in the hizzau
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18974
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -8.71, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2011, 07:31:22 pm »
Ignore

Also, I dislike the clear-cut model we're given for the poll. We can't just fully open up our markets to Somalia or Burma or Syria, but at the same time we can't shut ourselves off from the world and live entirely off of our own products.
Logged

Іbn Rushd
Averroës Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10701


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2011, 07:36:44 pm »
Ignore

Both are means to an end and nothing more. Trade policy should be formulated based on goals rather than an ideological commitment to one or the other.
Logged

Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5306
United States


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2011, 07:38:21 pm »
Ignore

I generally support free trade unless there is a very specific reason to impose tariffs or restrictions on a particular product or country. Overall both countries invloved in an interaction experience a net benefit, even though some in each may not. Clearly areas like my home and current residence do not benefit from free trade, but it's good in the long run after the inevitable, painful economic adjustment.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines