Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 08, 2016, 06:26:36 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
| | |-+  Nepal Politcs and Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Nepal Politcs and Discussion  (Read 766 times)
Californian Tony Returns
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36053
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2016, 06:33:50 pm »
Ignore

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/breaking-nepal-makes-first-amendment-of-its-constitution/

Nepal Ammended it's constitution to give further rights through proportional representation to Madheshi and other ethnic minorities, Madheshi's aren't backing down until they get their own (ethnic) state.

Is it geographically possible to carve out a homogeneously (say, >80%) Madheshi State?

Not unless you split Nepalese districts themselves, you can get a >40 or >50 madheshi state though.

Would they be satisfied with that? Although I do imagine it might create problems for the Nepalese minority in this area.
Logged


"It's easy to confuse what is with what ought to be, especially when what is has worked out in your favor."

Tyrion Lannister, Game of Thrones, ep. 5x09
Intell
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1743
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -3.16, S: 3.39

View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2016, 07:10:45 pm »
Ignore

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/breaking-nepal-makes-first-amendment-of-its-constitution/

Nepal Ammended it's constitution to give further rights through proportional representation to Madheshi and other ethnic minorities, Madheshi's aren't backing down until they get their own (ethnic) state.

Is it geographically possible to carve out a homogeneously (say, >80%) Madheshi State?

Not unless you split Nepalese districts themselves, you can get a >40 or >50 madheshi state though.

Would they be satisfied with that? Although I do imagine it might create problems for the Nepalese minority in this area.

They'd accept that as they've accepted under federalism, current district border lines will stay the same.



That's the current state map, meanwhile madeshi want the maps proposed by the maosits and the communist, before the communist brack tracked to reducing the number of states and refusing ethnic based statehood.

Look at southern Nepal to compare the two maps.



However a lot of the eastern states included in previous proposed maps, include non-madeshi kochi and mahakali zones.



The fate of Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari is yet to be decided.

Also states in the full far-west though considered in terai, is not considered in madesh.

Non-Madesh people in Terai are also gonna be pissed if the whole of terai is madeshi territory, especially in Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari on the far south-east of Nepal.
Logged





Two great Nepalese men, when politicians in Nepal were decent. Actual founders of a free Nepal.
Intell
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1743
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -3.16, S: 3.39

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 06, 2016, 10:59:50 pm »
Ignore

http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2016-02-07/koirala-deuba-locked-in-tight-race-for-delegates.html

Nepali Congress Leader Election between Susil Koirala and Bahadur Deuba.

Logged





Two great Nepalese men, when politicians in Nepal were decent. Actual founders of a free Nepal.
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines