Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 26, 2017, 09:58:12 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash, Kalwejt)
| | |-+  British PM: Trump Told Her He Supports NATO 100%
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: British PM: Trump Told Her He Supports NATO 100%  (Read 745 times)
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16179
United States


View Profile
« on: January 29, 2017, 04:26:15 pm »
Ignore

http://www.politico.com/video/2017/01/british-pm-trump-confirmed-he-is-100-percent-behind-nato-062097
Logged

Blue3
Starwatcher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6050
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2017, 07:03:41 pm »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Logged
rbk
CrabCake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11792
Kiribati


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2017, 07:40:29 pm »
Ignore

Although both are full of bluster, this is very much a case of a stoppable force meeting a movable object.
Logged

]
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7351
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2017, 10:21:12 am »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
Logged

Chairman (with limited role) of the 2020 Trump campaign
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7319


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2017, 10:23:33 am »
Ignore

Bullsh**t, the only thing Donald Trump supports 100% is himself.
Logged

Quote
    We will immediately repeal and replace ObamaCare and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare!

    Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2016

Quote
    @johnboehner @EricCantor "You can't con peopleif you don't deliver the goods, people will eventually catch on." The Art of the Deal

    Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 19, 2011
DavidB.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6655
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -0.97, S: 5.30

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2017, 10:41:59 am »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
I don't count on Republican Senators for anything anymore, and neither should you. They will always fall in line.
Logged
Make Politics Boring Again
exnaderite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5857


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2017, 10:51:38 am »
Ignore

Trump also told his creditors he will pay their bills 100%, and his wives he will be faithful to them 100%.
Logged

Economic Left/Right: -2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.72
Tintrlvr
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 290
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2017, 12:07:51 pm »
Ignore

Although both are full of bluster, this is very much a case of a stoppable force meeting a movable object.

This made me lol.

I'm pretty sure May heard what she wanted to hear.
Logged
Intell
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4484
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.39

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2017, 01:39:58 am »
Ignore

Yuhh, NATO is horrible.
Logged

Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7351
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2017, 11:13:38 am »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.
Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.
I don't count on Republican Senators for anything anymore, and neither should you. They will always fall in line.
This wouldn't be just confirming a cabinet secretary, this would be radically changing America's place in the World and indeed the entire alignment of world geopolitics. Most likely they just wouldn't let it come up for vote in the Senate in order to avoid voting against the President.
Logged

DavidB.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6655
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -0.97, S: 5.30

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2017, 01:10:36 pm »
Ignore

This wouldn't be just confirming a cabinet secretary, this would be radically changing America's place in the World and indeed the entire alignment of world geopolitics.
Which... is exactly what the Trump administration wants? Expect anything crazy.
Logged
Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3944


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2017, 05:17:19 pm »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
Logged

Make Politics Boring Again
exnaderite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5857


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2017, 05:26:35 pm »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
...because every adversary (and frienemy, and even the pluckier allies) of the US will also decide to ignore the treaties which enshrine the US as the world's dominant power?
Logged

Economic Left/Right: -2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.72
Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3944


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2017, 01:18:35 am »
Ignore

He supports it... but if they're doing a "bad job" he will be very "sad!" when he has to withdraw from it.

Pretty sure NATO is an actual treaty, which means the Senate would have to vote on withdrawal, and at the very least McCain, Graham, Flake, Murkowaki, Rubio, and Corker would vote against.

Why would the Pussygrabber regime pay any more attention to treaties, than to the Constitution and court orders?
...because every adversary (and frienemy, and even the pluckier allies) of the US will also decide to ignore the treaties which enshrine the US as the world's dominant power?

You're hoping for rational self interest from a regime that spent the past two weeks needlessly shooting itself in the ass?
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines