Voter Turnout
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:08:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Voter Turnout
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Voter Turnout  (Read 2388 times)
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 25, 2004, 07:33:54 AM »

How could this year's voter turn-out be so insignificantly larger than 2000's?
Logged
JNB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2004, 11:37:53 PM »


 Simpily put, the Democrats turned out their base like never before, they threw everything they got into this election, from the university campus' to union get out the vote efforts, not to mention GW Bush giving the Democrats quite a few issues dealing with "free trade" and job outsourcing. All and all, the Democrat voter drives were a great success and they had more votes than they expected.

  That said, the GOP had a ground game like never before, and while I wont say it was all Karl Rove, but for the most part, what he did worked. OH should have been a Kerry state, I thought it was going to be a Kerry state because of how badly the state has been doing economically, but as it turned out, the GOP GOTV machine worked far better than the Democrats. NV is another example, despite how record setting the registration efforts of the Democrats were there, same with NM.  MO is also not in that great of shape economically, but the end result was a 7 point Bush win, and WV was a complete embarassment for Kerry.

   The end result is for at least now, the sure fire belief in American   politics, that higher turnout helps Democrats is dead.
Logged
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2004, 06:33:13 AM »

But before the election, the one thing it seemed anaylists on both sides could agree on was that 2004 would be marked by high voter turnout. Although more people voted than in 2000 the graph on this site for 2004 shows no significant increase.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2004, 01:25:34 PM »

The end result is for at least now, the sure fire belief in American   politics, that higher turnout helps Democrats is dead.

This "belief" was never correct in the first place.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2004, 02:53:27 PM »

The end result is for at least now, the sure fire belief in American   politics, that higher turnout helps Democrats is dead.

This "belief" was never correct in the first place.
Yeah, but now it's not going to be held anymore.
Although I don't think it's all wrong.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,705
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2004, 03:38:21 PM »

The end result is for at least now, the sure fire belief in American   politics, that higher turnout helps Democrats is dead.

I personally think that had turnout been the same as 2000 Bush would have won by a large margin
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.