Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 07:49:12 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (law'd)
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Author
Topic: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (law'd) (Read 1803 times)
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21417
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #25 on:
November 24, 2011, 02:03:26 am »
I offer the following amendment as an addition to the current text.
Quote
4) All employers that earn less then $500,000 a year in Gross Income, will be allowed to deduct 15% of the increased labor costs, resulting from the increase in the minimum wage, for the first 12 months of it being in effect. Qualification for the said deduction will be dependent upon no terminations of employment, for the purpose of downsizing, occuring during the period in which this deduction is claimed, unless currently in bankrupcty restructuring or has been losing money for atleast one quarter prior to the termination.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #26 on:
November 24, 2011, 03:17:16 am »
^ That's probably fine with me. What do you think, Mary?
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #27 on:
November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm »
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #28 on:
November 26, 2011, 09:31:47 pm »
Quote from: bgwah on November 24, 2011, 03:17:16 am
^ That's probably fine with me. What do you think, Mary?
Totally. <3
Quote from: With a handful of pills no chasers on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
I have.. concerns about that. But I won't outright oppose it if Bgwah doesn't.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 9114
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #29 on:
November 26, 2011, 10:44:59 pm »
Quote from: With a handful of pills no chasers on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
I think this makes more sense, but I'm still not necessarily supportive of any age cutoff in the first place.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #30 on:
November 27, 2011, 03:05:40 am »
Both sponsors have accepted this as friendly. Senators have 24 hours to object.
Quote
4) All employers that earn less then $500,000 a year in Gross Income, will be allowed to deduct 15% of the increased labor costs, resulting from the increase in the minimum wage, for the first 12 months of it being in effect. Qualification for the said deduction will be dependent upon no terminations of employment, for the purpose of downsizing, occuring during the period in which this deduction is claimed, unless currently in bankrupcty restructuring or has been losing money for atleast one quarter prior to the termination.
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #31 on:
November 27, 2011, 03:06:25 am »
Quote from: With a handful of pills no chasers on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
While this is what I initially preferred, I want this to pass, and the President was opposed to 21...
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #32 on:
November 27, 2011, 05:47:07 am »
Quote from: bgwah on November 27, 2011, 03:06:25 am
Quote from: With a handful of pills no chasers on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
While this is what I initially preferred, I want this to pass, and the President was opposed to 21...
I feel like we could override a veto.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #33 on:
November 29, 2011, 12:57:48 am »
The amendment passed as friendly.
I have mixed feelings on the age aspect, and I think it would just be best to have a vote on Napoleon's amendment...
Senators, please vote aye, nay, or abstain on the following amendment:
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
Logged
Snowguy716
snowguy716
YaBB God
Posts: 15197
Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -8.52
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #34 on:
November 29, 2011, 01:06:56 am »
I remind you if the age is returned to 21, I will veto it. A veto override will definitely chill relations between the presidency and the senate as you will have completely removed any reason for compromise by simply overriding my veto.
There is no good case to have the arbitrary age of 21 for a living wage to kick in. What do you tell to 19 year olds with a kid or that just want to be financially independent?
WHy are we extending some aspects of adolescence into a person's early 20s (financial independence) while leaving other civic duties and responsibilities behind (like military service or voting)?
I have yet to see a good reason for this, other than that somehow companies will magically hire all sorts of 18-20 year olds because they can pay them less. That's ridiculous. All you will do is throw these people back out on the streets when they turn 21 and all the fresh college grads come in with their degrees to compete with the already working crowd.
I know in this day and age it seems almost impossible that there are 18-20 year olds out there raising families and working and struggling to be financially independent... but it is the case for a lot of Atlasians.
Unless there is a proposal to freely provide a university education to every student, thus extending fully the period of adolescence, or the age 18 level is maintained, I will veto this bill.
The 18 age level makes sense because at 18 you become an adult. You are finishing high school and are expected to move out into the world, be that college or work. I understand paying 14-17 year olds that work part time a lesser wage, since they can depend on their parents for basic support... but we are creating a donut hole here that many 18-20 year olds will fall through.
So, do what you will. But if the bill arrives on my desk with an age over 18... I will veto it and I won't forget it either.
Logged
"Above and beyond the question of how to grow the economy there is a legitimate concern about how to grow the quality of our lives."
-Paul Wellstone
Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #35 on:
November 29, 2011, 01:16:37 am »
Snowguy is right. I was uneasy about the idea of reinstating the 21 age restriction, and for good reason. His argument is compelling and has brought me out of the silly idea of compromise.
Quote from: bgwah on November 29, 2011, 12:57:48 am
Senators, please vote aye, nay, or abstain on the following amendment:
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on November 26, 2011, 08:46:23 pm
I'm offering an amendment to change 18 back to 21.
I vote
Nay.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Jbrase
YaBB God
Posts: 5112
Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #36 on:
November 29, 2011, 03:12:25 am »
I would prefer it at 21, sorry Snowy
Aye
«
Last Edit: November 29, 2011, 03:16:25 am by Jbrase
»
Logged
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 9114
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #37 on:
November 29, 2011, 03:24:57 am »
Nay. The President has convinced me.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #38 on:
November 29, 2011, 03:29:39 am »
Abstain
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #39 on:
November 29, 2011, 04:05:43 am »
Nay.
Logged
VP Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
Posts: 16547
Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -6.35
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #40 on:
November 29, 2011, 12:50:18 pm »
Nay. It would be silly to make it 21 considering 18 is the age you become an adult. Not everyone goes to college and gets plastered every weekend
Logged
I call that getting swindled and pimped
Proud Lieberal from Northeast
Kalwejt
YaBB God
Posts: 35909
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #41 on:
November 29, 2011, 05:52:58 pm »
Nay
Logged
I am not the champion of lost causes, but the champion of causes not yet won.
Norman Thomas
Wrecking Ball and Chain
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68306
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #42 on:
November 29, 2011, 11:42:35 pm »
Nay
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (amendment at vote)
«
Reply #43 on:
November 30, 2011, 03:42:24 am »
Amendment tally: 1-6-1, with 2 non-voting abstentions
The amendment has been rejected. Debate resumes.
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (debating)
«
Reply #44 on:
December 01, 2011, 05:59:09 pm »
Final vote. Please vote aye, nay, or abstain.
Quote
Living Wage Act
1) The federal minimum wage for those ages 18 and over shall be raised to $10.50 on January 1st, 2012 and to $12.00 on July 1st, 2012.
2) After the second raise, inflation-adjusted increases shall continue to occur as mandated in the Reasonable Minimum Wage Act.
3) The federal minimum wage will be unaffected for those under age 18.
4) All employers that earn less then $500,000 a year in Gross Income, will be allowed to deduct 15% of the increased labor costs, resulting from the increase in the minimum wage, for the first 12 months of it being in effect. Qualification for the said deduction will be dependent upon no terminations of employment, for the purpose of downsizing, occuring during the period in which this deduction is claimed, unless currently in bankrupcty restructuring or has been losing money for atleast one quarter prior to the termination.
AYE.
Logged
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (at final vote)
«
Reply #45 on:
December 01, 2011, 06:07:15 pm »
Aye.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
VP Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
Posts: 16547
Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -6.35
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (at final vote)
«
Reply #46 on:
December 01, 2011, 06:11:28 pm »
Aye
Logged
I call that getting swindled and pimped
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (at final vote)
«
Reply #47 on:
December 01, 2011, 08:18:30 pm »
Quote from: Senator Duke on December 01, 2011, 06:11:28 pm
Aye
You Socialist, you. <3
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (at final vote)
«
Reply #48 on:
December 01, 2011, 08:22:08 pm »
Aye.
This bill will reduce some of my region's competitive disadvantages with growth and the labor market.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 9114
Re: SENATE BILL: Living Wage Act (at final vote)
«
Reply #49 on:
December 01, 2011, 08:47:47 pm »
Aye to this timely and humane bill.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...