Scott Walker recall goes live
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:32:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Scott Walker recall goes live
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26
Author Topic: Scott Walker recall goes live  (Read 104913 times)
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #550 on: June 05, 2012, 11:06:31 PM »

What's up with Racine county? They've still only updated 23/66 precincts and its holding up that last senate race....
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #551 on: June 05, 2012, 11:07:08 PM »

Oh well. Better luck in November for the Democrats!
Logged
AmericanNation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,081


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #552 on: June 05, 2012, 11:20:32 PM »

Axelrod and DNC Chair Wasserman Schultz both say despite the results of #WIrecall, the vote sent a message to Scott Walker... That message? "You rock, keep at it."

Also, Bad night at Agincourt. British really need to regroup.

PS, is anyone working on a map?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,936


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #553 on: June 05, 2012, 11:25:55 PM »

Yeah, I'm starting to notice you have a serious problem with admitting when you're wrong. Good luck with that.

I realized a while ago that you were a pretty worthless poster, so don't worry about it.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #554 on: June 05, 2012, 11:27:29 PM »

Looks like Walker wins Eau Claire by about 200 votes.

Both Portage and La Crosse are still to close to call, but Barrett is leading in both.
Columbia is also sorta too close to call, but Walker probably won there.

Racine just hasn't bothered to report further results, but I suspect Walker wins there too.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #555 on: June 05, 2012, 11:29:26 PM »

We now have concrete evidence to prove PPP has a Democratic lean this cycle. Its good to have my suspicions confirmed.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #556 on: June 05, 2012, 11:36:03 PM »

Looks like Walker wins Eau Claire by about 200 votes.

Both Portage and La Crosse are still to close to call, but Barrett is leading in both.
Columbia is also sorta too close to call, but Walker probably won there.

Racine just hasn't bothered to report further results, but I suspect Walker wins there too.


Nope, Columbia County has gone for Barrett.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #557 on: June 05, 2012, 11:37:46 PM »

Looks like Walker wins Eau Claire by about 200 votes.

Both Portage and La Crosse are still to close to call, but Barrett is leading in both.
Columbia is also sorta too close to call, but Walker probably won there.

Racine just hasn't bothered to report further results, but I suspect Walker wins there too.


Nope, Columbia County has gone for Barrett.
Just saw that. It hadn't reported those 5 final precincts yet when I posted. I think Barrett will pull out in both Portage and La Crosse.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #558 on: June 05, 2012, 11:42:15 PM »

Looks like Walker wins Eau Claire by about 200 votes.

Both Portage and La Crosse are still to close to call, but Barrett is leading in both.
Columbia is also sorta too close to call, but Walker probably won there.

Racine just hasn't bothered to report further results, but I suspect Walker wins there too.


Nope, Columbia County has gone for Barrett.
Just saw that. It hadn't reported those 5 final precincts yet when I posted. I think Barrett will pull out in both Portage and La Crosse.


Portage has gone for Barrett with 100% reporting
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #559 on: June 05, 2012, 11:43:00 PM »

philly08, you keep on beating me by a couple seconds! lol. Yeah.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #560 on: June 05, 2012, 11:45:36 PM »

I wonder if this year's "Good news for John McCain" meme will be "Bad news for Mitt Romney"? I also recall that Romney's "underwhelming" primary wins were apparently very bad news for him.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #561 on: June 05, 2012, 11:46:17 PM »

What's up with Racine county? They've still only updated 23/66 precincts and its holding up that last senate race....

Not sure. But Walker is winning 63-37% there, with 35% of precincts reporting. That's much better than the 56-43% margin he won Racine by in 2010.

The city of Racine separately reports results, which aren't always quickly integrated into the county's spreadsheet or AP tally.  The city leans Democratic.  The rest of the county leads Republican.  So if Walker's up by that much, it's safe to assume that the AP results are light on the city of Racine.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #562 on: June 05, 2012, 11:46:43 PM »

Anybody else getting suspicious about Racine County's vote counters/
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #563 on: June 05, 2012, 11:48:43 PM »

Walker leads 53%-46% now with 97% of the vote in. This is basically 2010 all over again.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #564 on: June 05, 2012, 11:49:42 PM »

Anybody else getting suspicious about Racine County's vote counters/

No, just annoyed.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #565 on: June 05, 2012, 11:51:43 PM »

Why is it that Barrett is winning the counties Obama lost in '08, and Walker is winning the counties that Obama won in '08?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #566 on: June 05, 2012, 11:52:58 PM »

Why is it that Barrett is winning the counties Obama lost in '08, and Walker is winning the counties that Obama won in '08?

This web site uses red for Democrats and blue for Republicans.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #567 on: June 05, 2012, 11:56:11 PM »

Why is it that Barrett is winning the counties Obama lost in '08, and Walker is winning the counties that Obama won in '08?

This web site uses red for Democrats and blue for Republicans.


Walker still won La Crosse in 2010, and he's winning Green.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #568 on: June 05, 2012, 11:57:15 PM »
« Edited: June 05, 2012, 11:59:17 PM by cinyc »

Anybody else getting suspicious about Racine County's vote counters/

No, and I explained why in my previous post.  AP isn't integrating the Racine city and Racine county results well.

Racine city is 81% in.  Barrett leads Walker there 13596 to 7307.   The Republican incumbent in the Racine city portion of SD-21 is down 7056 to 13742.

In the rest of Racine County, Walker leads Barrett 25819 to 15002.   The Republican incumbent in the Racine county portion of SD-21 leads 16399 to 10775.  What percentage is out is hard to tell because of the way the county reports results.

So by my math, Walker leads Barrett 33126 to 28598.  AP is only showing about 50,000 votes.  The Republican incumbent in SD-21 is trailing by about 1,000 votes.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #569 on: June 05, 2012, 11:59:43 PM »

Why is it that Barrett is winning the counties Obama lost in '08, and Walker is winning the counties that Obama won in '08?

This web site uses red for Democrats and blue for Republicans.


Walker still won La Crosse in 2010, and he's winning Green.

Yeah, Walker lost ground in a handful of counties.  I'm not sure what this has to do with Obama, or why Green is remarkable.  Sorry if I'm failing comprehension here...
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #570 on: June 05, 2012, 11:59:43 PM »

Still Walker is taking a lot of the counties that Obama won in 2008.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,936


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #571 on: June 06, 2012, 12:00:47 AM »

Still Walker is taking a lot of the counties that Obama won in 2008.

A ~25% swing will do that.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #572 on: June 06, 2012, 12:00:57 AM »

Still Walker is taking a lot of the counties that Obama won in 2008.

...That tends to be what happens when you compare a Democrat +14% election to a Republican +7% one.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #573 on: June 06, 2012, 12:04:39 AM »

Still Walker is taking a lot of the counties that Obama won in 2008.

...That tends to be what happens when you compare a Democrat +14% election to a Republican +7% one.


Does that mean that the Wisconsinites prefer R's at the state/local level and D's at the National/Federal level?
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #574 on: June 06, 2012, 12:08:44 AM »

Still Walker is taking a lot of the counties that Obama won in 2008.

...That tends to be what happens when you compare a Democrat +14% election to a Republican +7% one.


Does that mean that the Wisconsinites prefer R's at the state/local level and D's at the National/Federal level?

No, not really. It's only two elections in different climates with different candidates. For instance, Jim Doyle won by larger margins than Kerry or Gore. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 12 queries.