Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 22, 2013, 07:55:45 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
General Politics
U.S. General Discussion
(Moderators:
Former Moderate
,
Badger
)
Are Republicans against vaccinations?
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Author
Topic: Are Republicans against vaccinations? (Read 1679 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #50 on:
December 01, 2011, 01:18:38 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:23:51 am
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 30, 2011, 08:26:26 pm
The difference is that everyone SHOULD get it, but the way he went about doing it was inappropriate.
I doubt the benefit exceeds the risk for the average Amish thirteen year-old girl.
Not at all clear. For that matter, the same argument could also apply to the polio vaccine for any individual person.
Logged
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31482
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #51 on:
December 01, 2011, 02:42:04 pm »
Even if she doesn't have consensual sex, there's always the risk of a sexual assault. And getting HPV as a result of that just adds insult to injury.
Logged
Link
YaBB God
Posts: 2419
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #52 on:
December 01, 2011, 02:56:18 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on November 30, 2011, 01:29:01 pm
Quote from: Verily on November 30, 2011, 12:31:54 pm
Polio vaccine side effects also include death. Michelle Bachmann has never objected to the polio vaccine. Both happen in extraordinarily rare circumstances.
1) Polio is a contagious disease.
Yeah dude, so is HPV...
Quote from: BigSkyBob on November 30, 2011, 01:29:01 pm
2)
Between 11 and 16 children are at risk of polio. Between 11 and 16 the same is not necessarily true of HPV/genital warts
. Bachmann has no objection to parents whom believe their eleven year-old is at risk from vaccinating.
Where do you live Bangladesh? How many American 11-16 year old girls get polio? I guarantee you there are exponentially more 11-16 year old girls with genital warts in the United States than have polio. That is a fact.
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:23:51 am
I doubt the benefit exceeds the risk for the average Amish thirteen year-old girl.
The Amish have historically made poor choices in regards to vaccinations. I really wouldn't hold them up as an example. Observe...
All
this information is available for free on the CDC website. Instead of screaming for smaller government why don't you actually utilize the first rate services the United States government is providing for the entire planet. With the amount of general ignorance about healthcare in America it's amazing Republicans are running for office based on cutting the CDC budget. Amazing...
«
Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 02:59:55 pm by Link
»
Logged
Insane quote of the year-
"
Every
aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #53 on:
December 01, 2011, 03:35:00 pm »
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2011, 03:30:37 am
If an Amish girl's parents don't want her to get it, they should have the right to object, but eventually she's going to have sex (probably), and should still be protected.
This is a rather bizarre assumption. It me, it seems more likely that she is about to enter into a monogomous relationship with an Amish boy whom isn't infected with any of the strains.
In that case, the risk of a severe reaction to shots, and the cost, outweigh the benefits.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #54 on:
December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm »
Quote from: Verily on December 01, 2011, 01:18:38 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:23:51 am
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 30, 2011, 08:26:26 pm
The difference is that everyone SHOULD get it, but the way he went about doing it was inappropriate.
I doubt the benefit exceeds the risk for the average Amish thirteen year-old girl.
Not at all clear. For that matter, the same argument could also apply to the polio vaccine for any individual person.
1) I think it is pretty clear that the average Amish thirteen year-old girl is not a risk of HPV infection.
2) Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #55 on:
December 01, 2011, 03:52:37 pm »
Quote from: Link on December 01, 2011, 02:56:18 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on November 30, 2011, 01:29:01 pm
Quote from: Verily on November 30, 2011, 12:31:54 pm
Polio vaccine side effects also include death. Michelle Bachmann has never objected to the polio vaccine. Both happen in extraordinarily rare circumstances.
1) Polio is a contagious disease.
Yeah dude, so is HPV...
You wish to raise a distinction doesn't make a difference. Very well. Polio is a contagious disease that places fellow students involuntarily at risk. HPV does not place fellow students at involuntary risk.
Since HIV meets you definition of a "contagious" disease, should we take steps to exclude such students from public schools?
Quote
Quote from: BigSkyBob on November 30, 2011, 01:29:01 pm
2)
Between 11 and 16 children are at risk of polio. Between 11 and 16 the same is not necessarily true of HPV/genital warts
. Bachmann has no objection to parents whom believe their eleven year-old is at risk from vaccinating.
Where do you live Bangladesh? How many American 11-16 year old girls get polio? I guarantee you there are exponentially more 11-16 year old girls with genital warts in the United States than have polio. That is a fact.
Again, any student in a classroom is at risk of Polio infection, thus the mandate to vaccinate. Any student in a classroom is not necessarily at risk of HPV, depending on their sexual behavior.
If you wish to quibble about the rarity of Polio, may I suggest that the solution to your quibble is to restrict mandatory vaccinations to other contagious diseases such as the measles and diphtheria, not mandate HPV vaccines.
This is simply a question of what should be a condition for attending school.
Quote
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:23:51 am
I doubt the benefit exceeds the risk for the average Amish thirteen year-old girl.
The Amish have historically made poor choices in regards to vaccinations. I really wouldn't hold them up as an example. Observe...
I don't think you really want to open that debate. We could compare rates of infects of HPV, genital herpes, HIV, and a host of other STDS for the Amish against the general population. Who makes better choices than whom would be an interesting question.
Quote
All
this information is available for free on the CDC website. Instead of screaming for smaller government why don't you actually utilize the first rate services the United States government is providing for the entire planet. With the amount of general ignorance about healthcare in America it's amazing Republicans are running for office based on cutting the CDC budget. Amazing...
Pure piffle posted with Emperor and His New Clothes indignation.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
krazen1211
YaBB God
Posts: 5153
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #56 on:
December 01, 2011, 03:59:28 pm »
It hardly makes any sense for a federal government official to be for or against vaccines. One might as well talk about whether the federal government is for wide ruled or college ruled notebooks.
Logged
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31482
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #57 on:
December 01, 2011, 05:13:59 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:35:00 pm
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2011, 03:30:37 am
If an Amish girl's parents don't want her to get it, they should have the right to object, but eventually she's going to have sex (probably), and should still be protected.
This is a rather bizarre assumption. It me, it seems more likely that she is about to enter into a monogomous relationship with an Amish boy whom isn't infected with any of the strains.
In that case, the risk of a severe reaction to shots, and the cost, outweigh the benefits.
1) Assuming she stays Amish.
2) Assuming her husband was never sexually active.
3) Assuming she never get sexually assaulted.
That's a decision the parents should make, but Bachmann's crusade against this vaccine was for people other than the Amish.
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
Posts: 12568
Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #58 on:
December 01, 2011, 06:26:49 pm »
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2011, 03:30:37 am
If an Amish girl's parents don't want her to get it, they should have the right to object.
Disagree. Denying your child medical care is abuse by definition. Abuse your child. Lose your child. Ditto for the Jehovah's Witnesses are their damn blood transfusion phobia.
Logged
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #59 on:
December 01, 2011, 08:04:40 pm »
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2011, 05:13:59 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:35:00 pm
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2011, 03:30:37 am
If an Amish girl's parents don't want her to get it, they should have the right to object, but eventually she's going to have sex (probably), and should still be protected.
This is a rather bizarre assumption. It me, it seems more likely that she is about to enter into a monogomous relationship with an Amish boy whom isn't infected with any of the strains.
In that case, the risk of a severe reaction to shots, and the cost, outweigh the benefits.
1) Assuming she stays Amish.
2) Assuming her husband was never sexually active.
3) Assuming she never get sexually assaulted.
That's a decision the parents should make, but Bachmann's crusade against this vaccine was for people other than the Amish.
1) If she leaves the Amish, she could vaccinate herself. No issue there.
2) The assumption is that her husband will remain faithful, and, he isn't infected.
If he is infected, she could vaccinate herself before marriage.
3) The number of rapes among the Amish is?
Bachmann's point is for parental rights, including those of the Amish.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Link
YaBB God
Posts: 2419
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #60 on:
December 01, 2011, 08:40:17 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
That's a
lie
.
Logged
Insane quote of the year-
"
Every
aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
Link
YaBB God
Posts: 2419
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #61 on:
December 01, 2011, 09:01:13 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 08:04:40 pm
3) The number of rapes among the Amish is?
Dunno. Somewhere north of 0. What do you feel the tolerable level of rapiness is?
Logged
Insane quote of the year-
"
Every
aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
Ebowed
YaBB God
Posts: 16026
Political Matrix
E: -7.76, S: -8.96
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #62 on:
December 02, 2011, 01:26:54 am »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
Uh, what?
Logged
Quote from: Politico on February 12, 2012, 07:59:23 pm
While Obama was snorting coke and memorizing Marx, Romney was out there helping people and building success.
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #63 on:
December 02, 2011, 01:50:28 am »
Quote from: Link on December 01, 2011, 08:40:17 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
That's a
lie
.
That is an assertion that is itself is a "lie."
Everything thing I stated I believe to be True, therefore, it cannot possibly be a "lie."
If you have any evidence that I am in "error," by all means share it.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #64 on:
December 02, 2011, 01:53:25 am »
Quote from: Ebowed on December 02, 2011, 01:26:54 am
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
Uh, what?
Um, sitting in the same classroom as a student with TB, polio, or diptheria places the other students at risk of contracting those diseases. The same is simply not True of HPV.
The notion that vaccinating against a disease that does not place any other student at risk should be a condition of attending school is absurd.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31482
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #65 on:
December 02, 2011, 02:20:32 am »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 02, 2011, 01:53:25 am
Quote from: Ebowed on December 02, 2011, 01:26:54 am
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
Uh, what?
Um, sitting in the same classroom as a student with TB, polio, or diptheria places the other students at risk of contracting those diseases. The same is simply not True of HPV.
The notion that vaccinating against a disease that does not place any other student at risk should be a condition of attending school is absurd.
It's not an airborne disease, but it IS contagious.
Logged
Link
YaBB God
Posts: 2419
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #66 on:
December 02, 2011, 07:04:13 pm »
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 02, 2011, 01:50:28 am
Quote from: Link on December 01, 2011, 08:40:17 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
That's a
lie
.
Everything thing I stated I believe to be True, therefore, it cannot possibly be a "lie."
If you have any evidence that I am in "error," by all means share it.
http://bit.ly/usPR1S
Logged
Insane quote of the year-
"
Every
aspect of life in America is worse than when he [Obama] took over" -Marco Rubio
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #67 on:
December 03, 2011, 01:46:49 am »
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 02, 2011, 02:20:32 am
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 02, 2011, 01:53:25 am
Quote from: Ebowed on December 02, 2011, 01:26:54 am
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
Uh, what?
Um, sitting in the same classroom as a student with TB, polio, or diphtheria places the other students at risk of contracting those diseases. The same is simply not True of HPV.
The notion that vaccinating against a disease that does not place any other student at risk should be a condition of attending school is absurd.
It's not an airborne disease, but it IS contagious.
Again, airborne diseases place the other students in the room at risk, whereas HPV does not. There is a rationale for insisting being vaccinated against "airborne" diseases be a condition for attending school. There is no such rationale for a disease such as HPV that are not spread airborne.
That simply is a distinction that makes a difference. If you believe that the state has the authority to mandate HPV vaccinations then you believe that the state, not parents, have the final say over those children's medical care. That is where the supports of Merck differ from Bachmann's position.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: Are Republicans against vaccinations?
«
Reply #68 on:
December 03, 2011, 01:50:02 am »
Quote from: Link on December 02, 2011, 07:04:13 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 02, 2011, 01:50:28 am
Quote from: Link on December 01, 2011, 08:40:17 pm
Quote from: BigSkyBob on December 01, 2011, 03:37:26 pm
Polio is a contagious disease, HPV is not.
That's a
lie
.
Everything thing I stated I believe to be True, therefore, it cannot possibly be a "lie."
If you have any evidence that I am in "error," by all means share it.
http://bit.ly/usPR1S
HPV is not "contagious" in a classroom setting. That is the context to which I was referring, and you know it.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...