Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 02:54:56 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  who will win - MA
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Poll
Question: who will win
Scott Brown   -22 (35.5%)
Democratic nominee   -39 (62.9%)
other   -1 (1.6%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 62

Author Topic: who will win - MA  (Read 2272 times)
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« on: November 30, 2011, 04:16:33 pm »
Ignore

who will win
Logged
RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12728
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2011, 04:25:37 pm »
Ignore

Scott Brown.
Logged

+7.35, +3.65



Is it excessive to hold a politician's feet to the fire for giving his base the run around at every turn?
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3445
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2011, 04:26:46 pm »
Ignore

Elizabeth Warren and by a very large margin.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6796
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2011, 04:34:06 pm »
Ignore

Brown by three points.
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21401
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2011, 04:59:03 pm »
Ignore

I think Brown will make it
Logged
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2011, 05:21:26 pm »
Ignore

Elizabeth Warren and by a very large margin.

bigger than Kerry1996?
Logged
Kevin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4789
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2011, 07:03:29 pm »
Ignore

Brown if current trend's hold. He's still relatively well liked by the people of Mass and hasn't done much to piss the electorate off.

Also Warren is vastly overrated by the Dem hacks on here.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2011, 11:46:58 pm by Kevin »Logged

RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12728
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2011, 07:07:57 pm »
Ignore

Brown if current trend hold. He's still relatively well liked by the people of Mass and hasn't done much to piss the electorate off.

Also Warren is vastly overrated by the Dem hacks on here.

Yep, she's (O-MA).
Logged

+7.35, +3.65



Is it excessive to hold a politician's feet to the fire for giving his base the run around at every turn?
Capitan Zapp Brannigan
Addicted to Politics
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1093


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2011, 07:28:18 pm »
Ignore

Elizabeth Warren.
Logged
Username MechaRFK
RFK
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1275
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.30

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2011, 07:41:11 pm »
Ignore

The ghost of Ted Kennedy.


In the real world, I hope Warren.
Logged



 
nkpatel1279
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1718
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2011, 12:50:28 am »
Ignore

Warren-D
In MA, Democratic voter turnout in Presidential election years are high. Warren can get the same percent of the vote as Coakley among Republicans and Independents but will do better among Democrats than Coakley.
Logged
Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37889
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2011, 05:05:39 am »
Ignore

Brown if current trend's hold. He's still relatively well liked by the people of Mass and hasn't done much to piss the electorate off.

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009: a special election scheduled in a middle of nowhere of American electoral calendar. 2012 will not only be a regular year, but also a presidential election one. Democratic turnout in Massachusetts will be high and this is a clear advantage for a Democratic candidate.
Logged

Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12919
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2011, 08:37:23 am »
Ignore

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

That was also during a heavily Democratic year in which Chafee was saddled with an incredibly unpopular incumbent president.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009: a special election scheduled in a middle of nowhere of American electoral calendar. 2012 will not only be a regular year, but also a presidential election one. Democratic turnout in Massachusetts will be high and this is a clear advantage for a Democratic candidate.

Please do not fall into the trap of assuming the special election in which Brown was elected was a low turnout one. Quite the opposite. The same number of people turned out in 2010 Senate special -- about 2,200,000 -- as did the 2010 general election -- again, about 2,200,000.
Logged

Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37889
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2011, 10:41:26 am »
Ignore

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

That was also during a heavily Democratic year in which Chafee was saddled with an incredibly unpopular incumbent president.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009: a special election scheduled in a middle of nowhere of American electoral calendar. 2012 will not only be a regular year, but also a presidential election one. Democratic turnout in Massachusetts will be high and this is a clear advantage for a Democratic candidate.

Please do not fall into the trap of assuming the special election in which Brown was elected was a low turnout one. Quite the opposite. The same number of people turned out in 2010 Senate special -- about 2,200,000 -- as did the 2010 general election -- again, about 2,200,000.

Really? That's suprising because I still heard turnout argument.

Anyway, I'm not from Massachusetts like you, so my position here is weaker, but Chafee was less of party and Bush loyalist than Brown seems to be GOP loyalist right now.

Also, 2010 was, um, a special year, when a lot of people choose to vote for Brown in order to show their yellow card to Obama. Also, Coakley was really pathetic candidate.
Logged

Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3211
United States



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2011, 11:05:55 am »
Ignore

Elizabeth Warren, no doubt.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3445
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 01, 2011, 11:14:31 am »
Ignore

Elizabeth Warren and by a very large margin.

bigger than Kerry1996?

I'll be risky and go on record: yes.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
Kevin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4789
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 01, 2011, 11:51:05 am »
Ignore

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

That was also during a heavily Democratic year in which Chafee was saddled with an incredibly unpopular incumbent president.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009: a special election scheduled in a middle of nowhere of American electoral calendar. 2012 will not only be a regular year, but also a presidential election one. Democratic turnout in Massachusetts will be high and this is a clear advantage for a Democratic candidate.

Please do not fall into the trap of assuming the special election in which Brown was elected was a low turnout one. Quite the opposite. The same number of people turned out in 2010 Senate special -- about 2,200,000 -- as did the 2010 general election -- again, about 2,200,000.

Really? That's suprising because I still heard turnout argument.

Anyway, I'm not from Massachusetts like you, so my position here is weaker, but Chafee was less of party and Bush loyalist than Brown seems to be GOP loyalist right now.

Also, 2010 was, um, a special year, when a lot of people choose to vote for Brown in order to show their yellow card to Obama. Also, Coakley was really pathetic candidate.

How Chafee voted didn't matter in 2006 since he had an R next to his name in a D year in an overwhelmingly D state. Besides Chafee wasn't as popular as Democrats on here are making him out to be. According to Rasmussen his approvals were only like 53%-45%

Now Massachusetts like Rhode Island is an overwhelmingly Democratic state overall, and no doubt will MA will go to Obama. However 2012 is looking like anything but a Democratic year, especially in the Senate.  
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 11:59:30 am by Kevin »Logged

GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6796
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 01, 2011, 12:06:13 pm »
Ignore

Brown if current trend's hold. He's still relatively well liked by the people of Mass and hasn't done much to piss the electorate off.

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009

You call having to close a thirty point defecit in just a few weeks a comfortable situation?
Logged
Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37889
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: December 01, 2011, 02:33:45 pm »
Ignore

Brown if current trend's hold. He's still relatively well liked by the people of Mass and hasn't done much to piss the electorate off.

That doesn't guarantee anything. Lincoln Chafee was a very popular Senator in Rhode Island, but still lost due to a simple thing called party identity.

Brown had a very comfortable situation in 2009

You call having to close a thirty point defecit in just a few weeks a comfortable situation?

Yes, because he is a Republican who got elected to the United States Senate from freaking Massachusetts.

Now Massachusetts like Rhode Island is an overwhelmingly Democratic state overall, and no doubt will MA will go to Obama. However 2012 is looking like anything but a Democratic year, especially in the Senate.  

And it's too early to say anything for sure.
Logged

Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37889
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: December 01, 2011, 02:36:15 pm »
Ignore

How Chafee voted didn't matter in 2006 since he had an R next to his name in a D year in an overwhelmingly D state. Besides Chafee wasn't as popular as Democrats on here are making him out to be. According to Rasmussen his approvals were only like 53%-45%

Such approvals are usually good news for incumbent Senator running for reelection.

Anyway, under good circumstances "R" next to Brown's name in November may play a factor too. We just don't know how would the situation look in November 2012 and assuming anything is at best premature.

By the way, unless many Democrats here, I'm not saying Brown is definitively going to lose, but he's not all-odds-safe either.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12610


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 01, 2011, 02:47:15 pm »
Ignore

Please do not fall into the trap of assuming the special election in which Brown was elected was a low turnout one. Quite the opposite. The same number of people turned out in 2010 Senate special -- about 2,200,000 -- as did the 2010 general election -- again, about 2,200,000.

It's not a "trap," it's a solid point. It was high turnout for a special election--but that's a caveat. You know that turnout in 2012 will be much higher than it was in the 2010 general or special election. Brown would have won anyway, but Dem performance in cities like Lowell and Lawrence collapsed because people stayed home who only come out for Presidential elections.

Scott Brown got 1,168,107 votes and won in 2010.
John McCain got only 60,000 votes fewer in 2008 and was absolutely trounced.

How many more people are going to vote for Brown who didn't vote for him in January 2010? Some, possibly... and maybe he won't lose too many who voted for him then because of his opponent or conditions at the time... but enough to get him to 50%? Tough. Can happen, but tough.
Logged
Kevin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4789
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2011, 05:41:36 pm »
Ignore

How Chafee voted didn't matter in 2006 since he had an R next to his name in a D year in an overwhelmingly D state. Besides Chafee wasn't as popular as Democrats on here are making him out to be. According to Rasmussen his approvals were only like 53%-45%

Such approvals are usually good news for incumbent Senator running for reelection.

Anyway, under good circumstances "R" next to Brown's name in November may play a factor too. We just don't know how would the situation look in November 2012 and assuming anything is at best premature.

By the way, unless many Democrats here, I'm not saying Brown is definitively going to lose, but he's not all-odds-safe either.

True to both of your points,

Given the state he's in and that it's early on Brown's clearly not safe. However, given the early indicators I do think the odds's are in his favour.
Logged

Skill and Chance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1823
View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 01, 2011, 05:49:59 pm »
Ignore

How Chafee voted didn't matter in 2006 since he had an R next to his name in a D year in an overwhelmingly D state. Besides Chafee wasn't as popular as Democrats on here are making him out to be. According to Rasmussen his approvals were only like 53%-45%

Such approvals are usually good news for incumbent Senator running for reelection.

Anyway, under good circumstances "R" next to Brown's name in November may play a factor too. We just don't know how would the situation look in November 2012 and assuming anything is at best premature.

By the way, unless many Democrats here, I'm not saying Brown is definitively going to lose, but he's not all-odds-safe either.

True to both of your points,

Given the state he's in and that it's early on Brown's clearly not safe. However, given the early indicators I do think the odds's are in his favour.

If there is more polling to back up what came out today, I don't know how you could say he is in a better position than Ben Nelson at the moment...
Logged
RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12728
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 01, 2011, 07:49:44 pm »
Ignore

YouGov is garbage according to Silver- they make Ras look like Gallup. I'd wait for a PPP or UMass poll myself.
Logged

+7.35, +3.65



Is it excessive to hold a politician's feet to the fire for giving his base the run around at every turn?
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11289


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2011, 07:58:45 pm »
Ignore

The YouGov poll was also a UMass poll so I'm not sure what you mean by 'waiting for a UMass poll'.

I'd say that this race is somewhere between Tilt and Lean D right now, all things considered, but who knows what might change.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 08:04:00 pm by Nathan »Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines