1968 Elections: McCarthy (D) vs. Reagan (R) vs. Wallace (I) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:52:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1968 Elections: McCarthy (D) vs. Reagan (R) vs. Wallace (I) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1968 Elections: McCarthy (D) vs. Reagan (R) vs. Wallace (I)  (Read 2264 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,310
United States


« on: December 03, 2011, 09:54:07 AM »

While I think Reagan would do worse against Humphrey, this is McCarthy, the hippy candidate. Therefore, the anti-hippy vote, personified by both Reagan and Wallace, does very well in the election. Reagan probably goes the same "Silent Majority" route as Nixon. Meanwhile, Wallace is able to pick off even more of the Southern Democrat vote. With blue-collars flocking even more away from McCarthy, Reagan does very well and Wallace benefits as well.

Governor Ronald Reagan (R-CA)/Governor Jim Rhodes (R-OH) 332 electoral votes
Senator Eugene McCarthy (D-MN)/Senator George McGovern (D-SD) 142 electoral votes
Former Governor George Wallace (AI-AL)/Admiral Curtis LeMay (AI-CA) 64 electoral votes
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,310
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2011, 10:27:16 AM »

Why does everybody assume McGovern would be McCarthy's running mate? The two didn't even get on that well.

I randomly chose a hippie politician. I couldn't think of anyone else in the three seconds I took to think of running-mates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.