James Buchanan question (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:53:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  James Buchanan question (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: James Buchanan question  (Read 2449 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: December 03, 2011, 11:56:56 AM »

Buchanan's problems as President began even before he was sworn in given his ex parte interference in the Dred Scott decision. The he tried to get Kansas admitted as a slave State. He was very maladroit in his handling of the Mormon problem in Utah.  And as CathCon as pointed out, he failed to take preventative actions prior to the Civil War when urged to do so.  Even if Buchanan decided to not reinforce Federal forts in the lower South for fears of aggravating Southerners, he could have chosen to remove military property from where it would be seized if Southern States seceded.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2012, 08:35:55 PM »

He should have sent in the military to break up the southern rebellion immediately as recommended by former President Fillmore, if he wanted a "take-charge" attitude.  Also, supported Bell or Douglas over Breckenridge in 1860, and enacted some civil liberties laws.

The military had a high proportion of Southerners in its officer corps, was largely stationed out west and was not particularly large.  Heck if Governor Pickens had not been an penny-pinching idiot, Major Anderson would never been able to make it from indefensible Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter, and that would have left no obvious place for flashpoint early in the Lincoln administration.

If anything, aggressive action by Buchanan after the lower south started to secede would have only gotten the Civil War started sooner, and with the North in worse shape.  It would have been entirely possible that Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri would have gone out in early 1861, and that there would have been serious fighting in California as well.

Now there are things Buchanan could and should have done before the election of 1860, but it is hard to see how he could have done better after the election, and very easy to see how he could have made it worse.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.