Daily Gallup GOP Tracking Poll Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 02:11:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Daily Gallup GOP Tracking Poll Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23
Author Topic: Daily Gallup GOP Tracking Poll Thread  (Read 89457 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #425 on: March 08, 2012, 03:07:21 PM »

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #426 on: March 08, 2012, 03:13:12 PM »
« Edited: March 08, 2012, 03:15:36 PM by J. J. »

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.

I missed those two and was looking at the end.  Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman.  It could be Gingrich, but they are both the same color on my monitor. 
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #427 on: March 08, 2012, 03:17:16 PM »

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.

I missed those two and was looking at the end.  Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman.  

By Bachman, you mean Bachmann.

By two, you mean five.

By "Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman," you mean, "man, I really made myself look like a grade-A schmuck."
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #428 on: March 08, 2012, 03:43:14 PM »

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.

I missed those two and was looking at the end.  Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman.  

By Bachman, you mean Bachmann.

By two, you mean five.

By "Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman," you mean, "man, I really made myself look like a grade-A schmuck."

It looks like Bachmann.  No, by two, I mean two in October.

Now, If you want believe Santorum can, through good campaigning, jump up 20 points, which is what Lyndon was claim, feel free to believe it.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #429 on: March 08, 2012, 03:47:21 PM »

Serious question: Do you even understand why you're being mocked in this thread?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #430 on: March 08, 2012, 04:02:46 PM »

haha J. J.

The two polls with Romney leads were in October, well after the Bachmann surge.

Your claim again, was:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

But, really, keep digging this hole, it's fantastic.

I missed those two and was looking at the end.  Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman.  

By Bachman, you mean Bachmann.

By two, you mean five.

By "Somebody was jumping up, I thought it was Bachman," you mean, "man, I really made myself look like a grade-A schmuck."

It looks like Bachmann.  No, by two, I mean two in October.

Now, If you want believe Santorum can, through good campaigning, jump up 20 points, which is what Lyndon was claim, feel free to believe it.

"It looks like Bachmann"?  you make so little sense

You evidently missed all five of the Romney +20 over Santorum polls, or you bizarrely think that behind "behind" someone requires that other person being ahead of all others.

Either way, you're ridiculous.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #431 on: March 08, 2012, 04:42:41 PM »




"It looks like Bachmann"?  you make so little sense

The colors on the graph, Alcon.  On my monitor, they are the same for Bachmann and possibly Cain.  I can't tell, because one of the lines is not labeled. The peak on 10/17 is the same color as the Bachmann lines (though I think she was fading at that point).

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?fips=19

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If you think as Lyndon thought, that Santorum increasing, while Romney increased, in IA, marks his good campaign skill relative to Romney, be my guest.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,532
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #432 on: March 08, 2012, 05:42:12 PM »

If you think as Lyndon thought, that Santorum increasing, while Romney increased, in IA, marks his good campaign skill relative to Romney, be my guest.

Are you dyslexic, retarded or both?

No, I'm not you.  And I thank God for that.

Well, that's pretty obvious. I for one seem to have a much better grasp of the English language than you.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #433 on: March 08, 2012, 05:44:10 PM »

If you think as Lyndon thought, that Santorum increasing, while Romney increased, in IA, marks his good campaign skill relative to Romney, be my guest.

Are you dyslexic, retarded or both?

No, I'm not you.  And I thank God for that.

Well, that's pretty obvious. I for one seem to have a much better grasp of the English language than you.

Although even being a Greek...in this case it doesn't mean a whole lot Smiley
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #434 on: March 08, 2012, 09:55:25 PM »




"It looks like Bachmann"?  you make so little sense

The colors on the graph, Alcon.  On my monitor, they are the same for Bachmann and possibly Cain.  I can't tell, because one of the lines is not labeled. The peak on 10/17 is the same color as the Bachmann lines (though I think she was fading at that point).

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?fips=19

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If you think as Lyndon thought, that Santorum increasing, while Romney increased, in IA, marks his good campaign skill relative to Romney, be my guest.

Cain and Bachmann are the same colors.  Bachmann/Cainm, Santorum, and Romney are all totally different colors.  How would Cain/Bachmann distract you into thinking Romney is less than 20% ahead of Santorum? Huh
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #435 on: March 08, 2012, 10:50:51 PM »




"It looks like Bachmann"?  you make so little sense

The colors on the graph, Alcon.  On my monitor, they are the same for Bachmann and possibly Cain.  I can't tell, because one of the lines is not labeled. The peak on 10/17 is the same color as the Bachmann lines (though I think she was fading at that point).

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?fips=19

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If you think as Lyndon thought, that Santorum increasing, while Romney increased, in IA, marks his good campaign skill relative to Romney, be my guest.

Cain and Bachmann are the same colors.  Bachmann/Cainm, Santorum, and Romney are all totally different colors.  How would Cain/Bachmann distract you into thinking Romney is less than 20% ahead of Santorum? Huh

I was trying to read who was ahead and trying to track who was ahead.  I missed the lead where Bachmann/Cain dropped and Bachmann/Cain (okay the lavender line) bounced up.  It looked like Romney was never leading (from August) and Santorum was always getting something.  I didn't see Romney hitting 20 until 12/12-1/12.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,583
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #436 on: March 08, 2012, 11:19:49 PM »

This reminds me of the argument as to whether the Wisconsin Dem primary in 2008 was "tightening", and makes one just as prone to want to bash their head into a wall.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #437 on: March 08, 2012, 11:21:06 PM »

Arguing with J.J. is seriously one of the most pointless things on the planet. I argued with him once over something unrelated to politics and he insisting he was nailing me on a technicality when he wasn't. It made zero sense.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #438 on: March 08, 2012, 11:30:15 PM »

At the rate this is going, there could soon be a huge hole in the argument that Gingrich dropping out would lead Santorum to come back and win the nomination. At this rate, even if all of Gingrich's supporters joined the Santorum camp, Romney would still hold a small lead.

Of course, there will probably be a decent chuck of the Gingrich vote that would go to Romney. Santorum will have to create a perfect storm in order to be able to come back and upset Romney.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #439 on: March 08, 2012, 11:50:21 PM »

At the rate this is going, there could soon be a huge hole in the argument that Gingrich dropping out would lead Santorum to come back and win the nomination. At this rate, even if all of Gingrich's supporters joined the Santorum camp, Romney would still hold a small lead.

Of course, there will probably be a decent chuck of the Gingrich vote that would go to Romney. Santorum will have to create a perfect storm in order to be able to come back and upset Romney.

I think if Gingrich would drop out before Tuesday, it could give Santorum a clear win both AL and MS. 

Paul dropping out might be a minor boost for Romney, but I doubt if it make much of a difference.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,368
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #440 on: March 09, 2012, 12:05:27 AM »

This reminds me of the argument as to whether the Wisconsin Dem primary in 2008 was "tightening", and makes one just as prone to want to bash their head into a wall.

That was classic.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,028
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #441 on: March 09, 2012, 03:21:34 AM »

This reminds me of the argument as to whether the Wisconsin Dem primary in 2008 was "tightening", and makes one just as prone to want to bash their head into a wall.

url?
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,583
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #442 on: March 09, 2012, 03:31:28 AM »

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=70892.0

Hey my graph is still up:



J. J.'s argument was basically that the race was tightening and Hillary was having a surge by bringing up the shift from day 3 to day 4 (which were both from different companies openly using different methods) and ignoring absolutely everything else.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #443 on: March 09, 2012, 04:20:52 AM »

I give up. This is comparable to arguing over whether the Pope is Catholic.
He absolutely is not. How dare you insinuate such a shameful thing.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #444 on: March 09, 2012, 02:05:30 PM »

Mar. 4 - 8, 2012

Romney 35 (-2)
Santorum 24 (+1)
Gingrich 13 (+1)
Paul 11 (nc)

Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #445 on: March 09, 2012, 02:26:09 PM »

Mar. 4 - 8, 2012

Romney 35 (-2)
Santorum 24 (+1)
Gingrich 13 (+1)
Paul 11 (nc)



Santomentum!
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #446 on: March 09, 2012, 03:03:09 PM »


I imagine that won't be the case after tomorrow's release. Then imagine the numbers after Saturday (Kansas)...

I will now accept my accolades.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,220


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #447 on: March 09, 2012, 03:03:42 PM »

Congratulations, Phil.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,368
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #448 on: March 09, 2012, 03:28:26 PM »

Mar. 4 - 8, 2012

Romney 35 (-2)
Santorum 24 (+1)
Gingrich 13 (+1)
Paul 11 (nc)



Santomentum!

And Newtmentum.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #449 on: March 09, 2012, 04:01:06 PM »

Yeah, because all of Gingrich's supporters will go directly to the Santorum camp.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.