if the supreme court strikes down the VRA...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:18:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  if the supreme court strikes down the VRA...
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: if the supreme court strikes down the VRA...  (Read 3692 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,831
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 10, 2011, 02:41:43 PM »

does that mean the IL dems can "spike" all the suburban chicago districts with blacks.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2011, 03:27:46 PM »

It would mean they wouldn't have any Federal law preventing them from doing so, I guess, but any map like that would be a tough sell for the black state legislators so I imagine it'd have a hard time passing.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2011, 04:00:41 PM »

The Illinois Constitution bars legislative mid decade redistricting.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2011, 12:03:30 AM »

The Illinois Constitution bars legislative mid decade redistricting.

Not for Congress, only for the legislature.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2011, 11:04:45 AM »

SCOTUS is not going to strike down the VRA in its entirety.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,646
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2011, 11:42:07 AM »

SCOTUS is not going to strike down the VRA in its entirety.

They wouldn't have to.  They would just need to rule that Section 2 and Section 5 do not apply to redistricting.  It's a little out there, but certainly within the realm of possibilities.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2011, 12:05:12 PM »

SCOTUS is not going to strike down the VRA in its entirety.

They wouldn't have to.  They would just need to rule that Section 2 and Section 5 do not apply to redistricting.  It's a little out there, but certainly within the realm of possibilities.

I can imagine striking section 5, particularly since Congress came close to that during the last decade. I don't see section 2 going away since there is too much weight of precedence defining the parameters of its application to redistricting. I expect that tightening the applicability will happen during this decade depending on which states have their cases go to SCOTUS.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,646
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2011, 12:59:54 PM »

This would also mean that Texas could probably draw 32 R+7 or greater districts in 2013.  But some left wing group would probably retaliate with a 2012 ballot referendum for at-large Congressional elections in California.  In short, it would be pure chaos nationwide.   
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2011, 01:13:07 PM »

The Illinois Constitution bars legislative mid decade redistricting.

Not for Congress, only for the legislature.

True, but I see no mechanism to get those blacks out of the Jackson/Rush/Davis districts.

Part of the ultimate issue is that people are using lawsuits to settle what the Missouri judge called a political quarrel. Perhaps that always occurred, but it seems to have ramped up this cycle.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2011, 10:18:37 PM »

I wonder how aggressive the southern states' GOP would get, in the absence of the VRA...

Miss.: certainly 4 safe GOP seats
Ala.: probably 7 safe GOP seats
Ga.: probably 2 Dem seats in Atlanta, the rest safe GOP
S.C.: probably would draw a Dem or swing seat with rest safe GOP
N.C.: probably similar to actual map
La.: probably 6 safe GOP seats esp. with New Orleans losing population

Texas would probably draw a few urban or border Dem packs.

Any other thoughts...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2011, 04:58:35 AM »

I can see them striking preclearance.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2011, 09:05:04 AM »

I wonder how aggressive the southern states' GOP would get, in the absence of the VRA...

Miss.: certainly 4 safe GOP seats
Ala.: probably 7 safe GOP seats
Ga.: probably 2 Dem seats in Atlanta, the rest safe GOP
S.C.: probably would draw a Dem or swing seat with rest safe GOP
N.C.: probably similar to actual map
La.: probably 6 safe GOP seats esp. with New Orleans losing population

Texas would probably draw a few urban or border Dem packs.

Any other thoughts...

In Texas the Democrats would get many 2 seats in Houston, 1 in Dallas, 1 in Austin/San Antonio, 2 in the Valley. Maybe 1 in El Paso if the mappers were generous.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2011, 09:14:28 AM »

How do you avoid a Dem seat in El Paso County? Split it three ways with one of the three being one of those listed under "Valley"?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2011, 10:26:09 AM »

How do you avoid a Dem seat in El Paso County? Split it three ways with one of the three being one of those listed under "Valley"?

Split in 2 and connect with Lubbock, Odessa, Midland. Would probably never fly, though, as I don't think Reyes is hated like Doggett is.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2011, 11:16:03 AM »

How do you avoid a Dem seat in El Paso County? Split it three ways with one of the three being one of those listed under "Valley"?

Split in 2 and connect with Lubbock, Odessa, Midland. Would probably never fly, though, as I don't think Reyes is hated like Doggett is.
It also wouldn't actually do the trick. At least not be certain to.



Green district here is actually (just barely) an Obama district.

So you would at the very least have to carve out the minority sections of Lubbock, in order to be able to stuff more of El Paso into that district and keep more Permian Basin in the other.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2011, 11:22:02 AM »
« Edited: December 13, 2011, 11:36:29 AM by Minion of Midas »

Yes, that did it.



54.6% and 55.0% McCain 2pp, respectively. Also 55% and 65% Hispanic VAP, respectively. Azn

And the next district after that combines Abilene, San Angelo and Laredo and anything not yet taken to the west, for 56.0% McCain and 59% Hispanic VAP. Nice.

I think I'll save this file and continue the project in the future. Not today though.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2011, 06:14:12 PM »

Yes, that did it.



54.6% and 55.0% McCain 2pp, respectively. Also 55% and 65% Hispanic VAP, respectively. Azn

And the next district after that combines Abilene, San Angelo and Laredo and anything not yet taken to the west, for 56.0% McCain and 59% Hispanic VAP. Nice.

I think I'll save this file and continue the project in the future. Not today though.

One of the Hispanic advocacy groups did propose a split somewhat like that of El Paso.  TX-16 would extend over to Odessa so another 90,000 El Pasoans would be in TX-23.  The Bexar County part of TX-23 would be 19% Black.

See C211 MALC Interim Congressional Plan.  TX-33 is also interesting.

Logged
lowtech redneck
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 273
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2011, 02:58:31 AM »

Ga.: probably 2 Dem seats in Atlanta, the rest safe GOP

I don't think the Republicans could get away with less than three Dem CDs in Metro Atlanta; there is a compact zone of overwhelming Democratic territory that's probably big enough for about 2.5 CDs all on its own, and Georgia voters are not as tolerant of obscene gerrymandering as the voters in Pennsylvania.  You could probably safely eliminate Bishop's district, though.

Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,830
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 14, 2011, 05:48:23 PM »

I think I'll save this file and continue the project in the future. Not today though.

Looking forward to seeing you continue this!

Also, lol at Culberson County there, less than 3k people but split between three districts.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2011, 04:54:02 AM »

I think I'll save this file and continue the project in the future. Not today though.

Looking forward to seeing you continue this!

Also, lol at Culberson County there, less than 3k people but split between three districts.
I wanted to split off a few hundred people for better population balance, and those two rural precincts happened to fit the bill nicely (IIRC both districts are within 150 of ideal now) and vote heavily for Obama. Cheesy
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 16, 2011, 02:20:07 PM »

I think I'll save this file and continue the project in the future. Not today though.

Looking forward to seeing you continue this!

Also, lol at Culberson County there, less than 3k people but split between three districts.
I wanted to split off a few hundred people for better population balance, and those two rural precincts happened to fit the bill nicely (IIRC both districts are within 150 of ideal now) and vote heavily for Obama. Cheesy

The precincts are:

   3-5

3-3 2 4

   1

2 and 1 are not contiguous, but 3-3 and 4 are.

I demand that 2 be moved to the purple district.

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 18, 2011, 06:27:39 AM »

You can, if 53% McCain 2PP is safe enough for you and you disregard incumbents for the time being, condense Democrats into three districts.



Emerald Snake 54% Black, 35% Hispanic, 7% White, 91.5% Obama
West Central 47% White, 39% Hispanic, 7% Black, 53.3% McCain
Harris / Fort Bend 32% White, 32% Hispanic, 18% Asian, 16% Black, 54.1% McCain
West 37% White, 34% Hispanic, 16% Black, 11% Asian, 57.1% McCain
Galveston & points west 45% White, 33% Hispanic, 14% Black, 57.9% McCain
Pasadena 55% Hispanic, 33% White, 7% Black, 57.6% McCain
North 40% Hispanic, 37% White, 18% Black, 56.7% McCain

And that's not even using Montgomery County (MontCo district in the north sheds 27k people on its rural edges)



Golden southern Dem Pack 95% Hispanic, 5% White, 78.2% Obama
Laredo & points north 64% Hispanic, 31% White, 55.4% McCain
Corpus & points east & points south 62% Hispanic, 33% White, 54.3% McCain
Hill Country & Hidalgo green district 67% Hispanic, 31% White, 56.1% McCain
San Antonio to Lake Jackson 57% Hispanic, 36% White, 5% Black, 55.6% McCain
San Antonio to College Station 50% Hispanic, 39% White, 9% Black, 55.0% McCain
NW Bexar 46% Hispanic, 42% White, 6% Black, 55.3% McCain
E Bexar 46% Hispanic, 41% White, 9% Black, 54.1% McCain
North Austin to Temple 58% White, 25% Hispanic, 9% Black, 6% Asian, 53.2% McCain
East Austin to beyond Bryan 50% White, 36% Hispanic, 10% Black, 53.4% McCain
Central Austin & random points north 67% White, 21% Hispanic, 6% Black, 54.9% McCain
South Austin to Wichita Falls (outside the map) 68% White, 22% Hispanic, 5% Black, 53.5% McCain

And Dallas, of course, doesn't need to look much different from what the R's actually drew (though what you see in tiny detail in this map works about as well. It's a max D pack inside Dallas County - 86.0% Obama - and kinda sloppily drawn around that.)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2011, 04:36:25 AM »

No comments?

I need to go cry now.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,680
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 19, 2011, 08:55:26 AM »


It's a thing of twisted evil. Also, he looks like a younger, Korean, Eric Pickles.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2011, 09:25:07 AM »

I particularly like the huge district linking parts of Hidalgo with, basically, nothing in particular.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 12 queries.