US annexing Canada, only a matter of time?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 02:37:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  US annexing Canada, only a matter of time?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: US annexing Canada, only a matter of time?  (Read 7379 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 29, 2004, 07:30:20 AM »

Hey English, you do know that Alberta Residents League(ARL) and the Alliance Party are working to free Alberta and then possible make it a state.

After about a year when they're bankrupt it more than likely will happen!

They're just cranks! All countries have secessionist movements, the UK has SNP, PC, SDLP, SF, even a damn Cornish Independence party. I'd be willing to bet, in a vote to join the US, Alberta would vote overwhelmingly to remain in Canada. It's perhaps the most pro-British, pro-monarchy province in the country. The probability of them rejecting ties with the commonwealth are nill.

Canada has a great deal in common with Britain in more ways than one. People have more alleigance to their region or province than to the capital or nation in general. People in BC hate Ontario in the same way that people in Scotland hate London. People in the Maritimes stick together in the same way that the Welsh or Cornish do.

That the Alliance is working to "free" Alberta, whatever the f that's supposed to mean, is just nonsense. They're working to win elections in Canada, how could they do that without their stronghold?
But Alberta is not the "most pro-British, pro-Monarchy province in Canada". It's got hardly any residents of British origin, they are all Germans, Poles and Ukrainians (the Whites, that is). And yes, there is some support for joining the US in that province. Just nowhere near enough to become a majority unless Canada breaks up first. Which seemed possible a decade ago, but not now.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 29, 2004, 07:33:22 AM »

Hey English, you do know that Alberta Residents League(ARL) and the Alliance Party are working to free Alberta and then possible make it a state.

After about a year when they're bankrupt it more than likely will happen!

They're just cranks! All countries have secessionist movements, the UK has SNP, PC, SDLP, SF, even a damn Cornish Independence party. I'd be willing to bet, in a vote to join the US, Alberta would vote overwhelmingly to remain in Canada. It's perhaps the most pro-British, pro-monarchy province in the country. The probability of them rejecting ties with the commonwealth are nill.

Canada has a great deal in common with Britain in more ways than one. People have more alleigance to their region or province than to the capital or nation in general. People in BC hate Ontario in the same way that people in Scotland hate London. People in the Maritimes stick together in the same way that the Welsh or Cornish do.


That's true. A lot of lefties in BC vote Reform/CA to say: f*** Ottawa! more than anything else.

Exactly. The only thing that unites most Canadians is there mutual dislike of Ontario!

Saskatchewan has also been mentioned as one of the contenders for joining Alberta as some sort of 51st state. I think I should add that Sask is economically very, very left wing. It has nothing in common at all with the heavily Republican states on it's southern border. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Sask continually elect NDP administrations?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 29, 2004, 07:45:26 AM »

It does. In federal elections it's about as Conservative as BC, though. Saskatchewan would not join the US without bloodshed.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 29, 2004, 07:48:50 AM »

Exactly. The only thing that unites most Canadians is there mutual dislike of Ontario!

Saskatchewan has also been mentioned as one of the contenders for joining Alberta as some sort of 51st state. I think I should add that Sask is economically very, very left wing. It has nothing in common at all with the heavily Republican states on it's southern border. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Sask continually elect NDP administrations?

The NDP have ruled Sask since 1990, first under Roy Romanow (who, along with Trudeau and Chretien, wrote the Canadian constitution back in the early '80'), and now under Lorne Calvert (a Bible Bashing Leftie. They get these a lot in the Praries (think of Tommy Douglas (who was a Baptist minister) or more recently Bill Blaikie(who is a United Church minister) who got in a fight with Alberta Premier, Ralph Klein (who is HATED in Sask) and won last years election by accusing the opposition Sask Party of "Alberta Envy")

People in Saskatchewan and Manitoba hate people in Alberta
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 29, 2004, 07:54:14 AM »

Goodness me, does anyone in Canada like anyone else? Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: March 29, 2004, 07:58:22 AM »

Goodness me, does anyone in Canada like anyone else? Smiley

Nope. They're bound together by mutual animosity Wink
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: March 29, 2004, 08:02:23 AM »

People in Alberta sure tell more bad jokes about people from Saskatchewan than about people from Ontario...Then again, the other three objects of racial dislike in Alberta are Americans, Native Americans and Newfoundlanders...Don't ask me why they don't like Newfies...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: March 29, 2004, 08:06:05 AM »

People in Alberta sure tell more bad jokes about people from Saskatchewan than about people from Ontario...Then again, the other three objects of racial dislike in Alberta are Americans, Native Americans and Newfoundlanders...Don't ask me why they don't like Newfies...

Alberta is quite an unpleasant place really...
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: March 29, 2004, 08:08:32 AM »

Lake louise & Moraine lake are very nice though!
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: March 29, 2004, 05:19:28 PM »

Sorry to burst you Yankee's bubble, but the thing that unites Canada most is a strong sense of Anti-Americanism. Canada has a serious identity crisis, questions of our annexation are likely part of the cause. Alberta has the largest realistic separation movement yes, but they have some crazy strong Canadian Nationalist. The more extreme your country's party is the other side is equally extreme. So out west you have those lunatic Conservatives/Alliance and the NDP.

I agree with a lot of the comments against the annexation of Canada. Alberta is right yes, but likely compares more to Ohio than Texas or Alabama. Albertans like their FREE healthcare system.

Siege40
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: March 29, 2004, 05:22:47 PM »

Oh, and I'd like to point out, that maybe the Republicans wouldn't let us join if we wanted too. The Dems would push for it, but what does the Republicans want 300 more seats filled with Democrats?

Siege40
Logged
MarkDel
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,149


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: March 29, 2004, 05:44:16 PM »

Sorry to burst you Yankee's bubble, but the thing that unites Canada most is a strong sense of Anti-Americanism. Canada has a serious identity crisis, questions of our annexation are likely part of the cause. Alberta has the largest realistic separation movement yes, but they have some crazy strong Canadian Nationalist. The more extreme your country's party is the other side is equally extreme. So out west you have those lunatic Conservatives/Alliance and the NDP.

I agree with a lot of the comments against the annexation of Canada. Alberta is right yes, but likely compares more to Ohio than Texas or Alabama. Albertans like their FREE healthcare system.

Siege40

SIege,

You have said some incredibly silly things in other posts, BUT, I would like to commend you on this post. You are 1000% correct. The main, perhaps only, thing holding Canada together as a nation is its hatred of America and all things American. As someone who has spent a lot of time in your country, even having lived there for nearly a year, I can tell everyone here that you are correct about this point.

Canada, at this point, is a collection of provinces, all of which have very, very little in common. There's nothing cultural that holds this nation together, other than maybe Hockey and donuts, and the difference between the East and the West is about as dramatic a difference as any country in the world. There's nothing cultural, religious, social, anything that holds Canadians together. There's nothing that they can define as "Canadian" per se. Hence they express their identity, or lack of same, through expressions of "we're not Americans" If someone asked "What does being a Canadian mean  to you" the answer would be "I'm not an American" The national identity of Canada is "We're not Americans" and that's a sad, but true statement on your part.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: March 30, 2004, 02:27:06 AM »

If I wasn't an american, I don't really think I would want to be an american, actully. Well, thats not true. If, just say, I was a Sudanese refugee, I would prefer to go to Canada trhen come here.

Thats something that we have to change-ASAP.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: March 30, 2004, 04:26:36 AM »

If I wasn't an american, I don't really think I would want to be an american, actully. Well, thats not true. If, just say, I was a Sudanese refugee, I would prefer to go to Canada trhen come here.

Thats something that we have to change-ASAP.

You've got that right!
The US seems to have gone very right wing at the moment. I don't think as a foreigner I would feel very comfortable.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: March 30, 2004, 06:33:31 AM »

Well, lots of them are still coming. THough it's not as if the US had the highest immigration rates in the world (as many Americans seem to believe).

But basically, if you're a Sudanese refugee, you don't care where you're going as long as it's a country you've heard of in the Northern Hemisphere. Which means people go wherever they can and wherever there's already an established community from their country.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: March 30, 2004, 09:24:57 AM »

Most of the immigrants to the US are probably Mexicans swimming across the Rio Grande.  
Logged
Kghadial
Rookie
**
Posts: 223


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: March 30, 2004, 01:43:29 PM »

Most of the immigrants to the US are probably Mexicans swimming across the Rio Grande.  

Actually they wade.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: April 05, 2004, 12:36:01 AM »

LOL, you people seriously can't see a joke when you see one, can you?  The US is not about to annex any part of Canada!  Come on.  Perhaps, in the distant future, there may be a voluntary union.  But the US hasn't taken any territory by force since the days of European imperialism.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,174


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: April 05, 2004, 01:12:34 AM »


I think there is a realistic scenario in which part of Canada would seek to become part of the US.  

If Quebec somehow won independence from the rest of Canada, the four maritime provinces would be disconnected from the rest of the country.
They are pretty culturally similar to New England, and would probably be at home with the politics of Vermont and Maine.  So I voted "only the maritime provinces."
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: April 05, 2004, 04:35:58 AM »

Nova Scotia wouldn't... even the Conservatives are left wing there... Wink
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: April 05, 2004, 02:45:16 PM »

Canadian Nationalism is going up, as time progesses we create a stronger national identidy. Within a hundred years time Canada will be very well unified, especially as Quebec becomes Anglosized, sad, but true.

Siege40
Logged
Emsworth
Lord Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: April 05, 2004, 05:20:30 PM »

Defintely, Alberta should not be annexed. We don't need any more Republican Senators.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,797


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: April 05, 2004, 10:42:36 PM »

But Alberta is not the "most pro-British, pro-Monarchy province in Canada". It's got hardly any residents of British origin, they are all Germans, Poles and Ukrainians (the Whites, that is). And yes, there is some support for joining the US in that province. Just nowhere near enough to become a majority unless Canada breaks up first. Which seemed possible a decade ago, but not now.
You've hit on an important point. I remember 25 years ago when the first movement for Quebec independence (that made it here) was underway. The impression I had here in the states was not would the US annex some provinces, but would the US entertain a request from provinces rent asunder by Quebec. I think there was not a lot of interest on the US side back then, but there was some fear that Provinces (especialy the Maritimes) might be left adrift looking for help.

That was the 70's. I think Canada has come to grips with the issue of Quebec over the last two decades, and there is greater sense of Canadian national self now then there was back then. Furthermore, NAFTA eased many economic differences, and I see little reason to suspect border shifts initiated from either side.
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: April 06, 2004, 02:35:59 PM »

But Alberta is not the "most pro-British, pro-Monarchy province in Canada". It's got hardly any residents of British origin, they are all Germans, Poles and Ukrainians (the Whites, that is). And yes, there is some support for joining the US in that province. Just nowhere near enough to become a majority unless Canada breaks up first. Which seemed possible a decade ago, but not now.
You've hit on an important point. I remember 25 years ago when the first movement for Quebec independence (that made it here) was underway. The impression I had here in the states was not would the US annex some provinces, but would the US entertain a request from provinces rent asunder by Quebec. I think there was not a lot of interest on the US side back then, but there was some fear that Provinces (especialy the Maritimes) might be left adrift looking for help.

That was the 70's. I think Canada has come to grips with the issue of Quebec over the last two decades, and there is greater sense of Canadian national self now then there was back then. Furthermore, NAFTA eased many economic differences, and I see little reason to suspect border shifts initiated from either side.

The Separtist movement has come to a screeching halt. It's likely to slow down or stop soon, immagrants from Asia and Europe and the rest of the world pile into Canada, Quebec offers some excellent careers so many are landing there, and a lot of them speak English. The Soveirgnity issue will diminish over time, it will flare up a time or two in the next 20 years but I think '95 was the height of the movement.

Siege40
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: June 16, 2005, 10:02:49 PM »

Bump. Someone move this please!!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 13 queries.