The Ron Paul Administration: What Would It Look Like?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:55:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Ron Paul Administration: What Would It Look Like?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: The Ron Paul Administration: What Would It Look Like?  (Read 2583 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 13, 2011, 03:03:37 PM »

Let's not just laugh at the notion. Anything is possible, I suppose, right?

What would a Ron Paul Administration look like?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2011, 03:05:36 PM »

The Bronx Zoo.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2011, 03:05:53 PM »

Wrong board.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2011, 03:08:50 PM »

Vander Blubb,

How did you figure out how to remove your original registered name in small print?  Whatever it is, bravo.  This is far more convincing.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2011, 03:27:12 PM »

Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2011, 03:33:19 PM »

a total sh**tshow.  I'd probably support him over Obama because Paul is best in the areas that the executive has the most power: colonizing the world, DEA, etc.
Logged
cavalcade
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 739


Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2011, 03:42:06 PM »

Vice President Mark Cuban?
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2011, 03:50:13 PM »

Good.
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2011, 04:11:27 PM »

Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,300


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2011, 04:20:14 PM »

Somewhere between



and

Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2011, 04:35:23 PM »


Nah, Paul wouldn't actually be able to enact any of his agenda due to a Congress not partial to Paulism.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,300


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2011, 04:38:44 PM »


As the CnC, he could evacuate all the military bases he wanted, and as president he could use the executive pardon to free nonviolent drug offenders. In other words, he'd please the leftists without congressional approval.
Logged
argentarius
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2011, 04:40:21 PM »

Well the president has the most powers in justice and foreign policy, and I think that these 2 areas are his strongest by some distance so I think his presidency would look, um, great.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2011, 04:41:02 PM »

Serious question; who would he put in his cabinet?  I am having a hard enough thinking of a Running Mate.  And don't say Johnson; I get the feeling they don't like each other very much.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2011, 04:42:27 PM »

Serious question; who would he put in his cabinet?  I am having a hard enough thinking of a Running Mate.  And don't say Johnson; I get the feeling they don't like each other very much.

Presumably a bunch of Republican stalwarts if he wants to actually have any of them confirmed...
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2011, 04:45:04 PM »

Napolitano's name comes up a lot as a potential VP. I could see him somewhere. Besides VP, he could end up as AG, maybe even a potential judicial nominee.

Pat Buchanan and Paul agree on a lot, though Buchanan supports fair trade while Paul supports free trade. Kucinich could also end up somewhere.

Normally, it seems a president chooses several of the people whom he ran against for his parties nomination to put in his cabinet. But I'm not sure I could see Paul doing that with most of the other candidates for the Republican nomination except maybe Johnson.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2011, 04:48:29 PM »

I would write out a list of reasons why Somalia is not libertarian at all, but going from other things you have posted in the past I see no use as you clearly do not take facts into account when you form your opinions.


Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 13, 2011, 04:50:51 PM »

By the end of it, we would be begging for statism.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 13, 2011, 04:59:39 PM »

By the end of it, we would be begging for statism.

Nonsense! Abolishing the social safety net will free the poor from the shackles of Big Government (tm), allowing them to achieve success. Ignore the people who can't afford to eat, they're weak, weak, damn it, and must be sacrificed to achieve your full nihilist potential. Paul for President!
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 13, 2011, 05:08:54 PM »

Paul dislikes Johnson? I didn't know anything about that.  I figured he would ultimately endorse Johnson if he didn't run Indy himself.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 13, 2011, 05:09:07 PM »

He might end up being interesting militarily. But Congress would block most huge domestic changes he may propose...
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 13, 2011, 05:13:22 PM »

Fortuno (More establishment friendly without actually being establishment, so a good vp pick)
Johnson (but where?)
Shiff (Treasury?)

I can easily see any of them in there.

"The Judge" for Attorney General or a potential SCOTUS nominee maybe
Logged
Capitan Zapp Brannigan
Addicted to Politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 13, 2011, 05:17:20 PM »

VP: Rand Paul

Tongue
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 13, 2011, 05:29:36 PM »

Paul dislikes Johnson? I didn't know anything about that.  I figured he would ultimately endorse Johnson if he didn't run Indy himself.

From what I gathered, Johnson had gone to Paul to inform him of his campaign, knowing full well that Paul was going to run. Paul had been planning his run for a few years, and Johnson decided to run anyway, splitting their base (Johnson is only taking away 1% from Paul at the most).
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2011, 05:33:42 PM »

Best answer is TBD.  I suspect you'd see some quirky dudes in a few places but mostly the economic conservatives.  If he wins the GOP nom, the party faithful will line up behind him and push for a cross-section cabinet, but he'll avoid putting the nutty socons in places where they could do harm.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.