Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 18, 2013, 09:01:48 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Election What-ifs?
International What-ifs
(Moderator:
Bacon King
)
US with Canadian parties
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
Author
Topic: US with Canadian parties (Read 9565 times)
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #225 on:
January 20, 2012, 06:10:09 pm »
Quote from: Nathan on January 20, 2012, 05:51:38 pm
New riding names in the changed area: Poconos--Sayre and The Valley, Wyoming Valley, Harrisburg--Mid-Susquehanna, Altoona--State College, Allegheny. It should be obvious which is which. One can even out the populations a little more by putting Schuykill in Poconos--Sayre and The Valley, but that looks atrocious and makes no sense. The hemicycle of mountainous counties north and east of the Wyoming Valley is a community of interest. Schuykill County is not part of that community of interest. Bradford County barely is (the community of interest of which it is really part crosses state lines up towards Elmira), but it has to be in it for the populations to work at all without splitting anything.
I'd say that's an improvement, but I'm still not completely sold (yet). I'm working on something right now, but I'm not sure if it'll work.
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #226 on:
January 20, 2012, 06:14:47 pm »
Please keep my ridings in the west and south-east intact. I'm quite proud of those setups. Other than that I'm more than willing to see what you come up with.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #227 on:
January 20, 2012, 06:23:22 pm »
Quote from: Nathan on January 20, 2012, 06:14:47 pm
Please keep my ridings in the west and south-east intact. I'm quite proud of those setups. Other than that I'm more than willing to see what you come up with.
Nothing will be changed in the southeast (York- Gettysburg, Lancaster, Berks, Lehigh Valley are considered the borders of the southeast for this purpose) or in Allegheny County, but I may have to shift a couple of things in the west. The central part of the state is what will likely be changed most, however. Unfortunately, my browser just crashed, which means I have to start over. I'll try again after dinner.
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14187
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #228 on:
January 20, 2012, 06:38:40 pm »
Quote from: Hans Krueger, Chairman of the Frenem Workers' Party on January 20, 2012, 04:26:30 pm
Quote from: Nathan on January 20, 2012, 03:38:01 pm
Georgia, I should point out, is Bacon King's map, not mine; I just named the ridings.
In that case, I'll defer to his judgment, since he's actually, you know,
from
Georgia. But I still think Houston County belongs with Macon.
I did mention earlier that my Georgia map should just be considered a first draft
The question of what to do with Houston County was one of the big questions I had. It's a suburb of Macon, so it definitely has major economic connections with the city, but demographically and politically Houston and Bibb Counties are polar opposites that otherwise have more in common with other areas around them.
Logged
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #229 on:
January 20, 2012, 07:03:35 pm »
Quote from: Hans Krueger, Chairman of the Frenem Workers' Party on January 20, 2012, 06:23:22 pm
Quote from: Nathan on January 20, 2012, 06:14:47 pm
Please keep my ridings in the west and south-east intact. I'm quite proud of those setups. Other than that I'm more than willing to see what you come up with.
Nothing will be changed in the southeast (York- Gettysburg, Lancaster, Berks, Lehigh Valley are considered the borders of the southeast for this purpose) or in Allegheny County, but I may have to shift a couple of things in the west. The central part of the state is what will likely be changed most, however. Unfortunately, my browser just crashed, which means I have to start over. I'll try again after dinner.
Thanks! York--Gettysburg and Lancaster are the parts of the state I'm most familiar with in any case. I look forward to seeing what you come up with for the central part!
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14187
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #230 on:
January 20, 2012, 07:19:09 pm »
Here's a noticeably improved Georgia map.
Douglas County goes much better with Atlanta than with Cobb, for starters. I'm still not very happy with the five Southern districts, but they're better than they were. The Macon district and the Athens-Augusta district are both around 15% underpopulated; I don't know if that's significant enough to be an issue. I like the boundary between the (DRA colors) 1st and 8th districts; the Okefenokee forms a natural barrier there in the south.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #231 on:
January 20, 2012, 08:46:48 pm »
Blue: The blue represents areas that I have completely forbidden myself from changing from Nathan's map. I consider those thirteen ridings done perfectly, so I made them non-negotiable.
Green (Harrisburg-Carlisle): My plan reunites Harrisburg with its suburbs in Cumberland County. Population: 503,506 (8.83% underpopulated).
Purple (Lebanon-Pottsville-Sunbury): I'm not too happy about having to put Lebanon in this riding, but it is connected to Schuylkill County by Interstate. Population: 461,947 (16.36% underpopulated).
Red (Wyoming Valley): I cut Columbia County from Nathan's version of this riding. Columbia County is not in the Scranton-Wilkes Barre MSA, and it's presence only adds to that riding's deviation from the ideal. Not to mention that Columbia County was needed for the purple riding. Population: 563,631 (2.06% overpopulated).
Gold (Poconos-Sayre and the Valley): I added tiny Sullivan County to Nathan's version of this riding. Population: 457,688 (17.13% underpopulated).
Teal (Chambersburg-Altoona-Lewistown): I wanted to get State College into a north-central Pennsylvania riding rather than a south-central one. It just looks better to me that way. Population: 544,216 (1.46% underpopulated).
Dim Gray (Monongahela): I kept this riding from Nathan's map intact. Population: 460,854 (16.55% underpopulated).
Slate Blue (Johnstown-Greensburg): I kept this riding from Nathan's map intact. Population: 597,728 (8.23% overpopulated).
Cyan (Beaver-Butler-Oil City): I had to add to this riding and the Erie riding to get the State College riding down to an acceptable population.
Note: After taking this screenshot, I put Venango County into the Erie riding.
Population: 554,438 (0.39% overpopulated).
Deep Pink (Erie-Sharon): Population: 590,484 (6.92% overpopulated).
Lime (State College-Williamsport-Allegheny Plateau): I think this is more aesthetically pleasing. I-80 serves all of the major population centers. Population: 621,047 (12.45% overpopulated).
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #232 on:
January 20, 2012, 10:55:39 pm »
And here we are!
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14187
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #233 on:
January 21, 2012, 01:30:57 pm »
Here's my effort at a Louisiana map:
Blue:
New Orleans - West Bank
. Plaquemines doesn't really go with New Orleans, but St. Bernard and west Jefferson definitely do. West Jefferson goes better with New Orleans than east Jefferson.
Yellow:
Metarie - Gonzalez
. There's no way at all that east Jefferson belongs in the same district as Cajun country. I think this I-10 district from Gonzalez to Metarie does a decent job of maintaining a community of interest without being too odd or messing up the rest of the map.
Green:
Baton Rouge
. Self explanatory; Baton Rouge district.
Red:
North Shore
. Pointe Coupee and West Feliciana (the two parishes in the far west of the district) should probably be in another district, but that would make the map look way too odd and I guess they fit well enough.
Purple:
Gulf Coast
(?). Cajun district!
Teal:
Lake Charles - Opelousas - Lafayette
. I think that name might be too big, but I like how the district manages to be so rectangular.
Gray:
Alexandria - Monroe
. I'm worried this district is a bit too big physically, but I guess it's not that bad
Grayish-blue:
Shreveport
. This could be expanded southward but I like the idea of a district that stays within the Shreveport area.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #234 on:
January 21, 2012, 02:10:47 pm »
Quote from: Bacon King, VP on January 21, 2012, 01:30:57 pm
Here's my effort at a Louisiana map:
Blue:
New Orleans - West Bank
. Plaquemines doesn't really go with New Orleans, but St. Bernard and west Jefferson definitely do. West Jefferson goes better with New Orleans than east Jefferson.
Yellow:
Metarie - Gonzalez
. There's no way at all that east Jefferson belongs in the same district as Cajun country. I think this I-10 district from Gonzalez to Metarie does a decent job of maintaining a community of interest without being too odd or messing up the rest of the map.
Green:
Baton Rouge
. Self explanatory; Baton Rouge district.
Red:
North Shore
. Pointe Coupee and West Feliciana (the two parishes in the far west of the district) should probably be in another district, but that would make the map look way too odd and I guess they fit well enough.
Purple:
Gulf Coast
(?). Cajun district!
Teal:
Lake Charles - Opelousas - Lafayette
. I think that name might be too big, but I like how the district manages to be so rectangular.
Gray:
Alexandria - Monroe
. I'm worried this district is a bit too big physically, but I guess it's not that bad
Grayish-blue:
Shreveport
. This could be expanded southward but I like the idea of a district that stays within the Shreveport area.
Could we have a closeup of the split in Jefferson Parish? I'm not really sure what you mean by East Jefferson and West Jefferson- the split looks more north-south to me.
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14187
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #235 on:
January 21, 2012, 02:46:17 pm »
The split is the Mississippi River. West Jefferson is the west bank of the Mississippi (i.e., the southern half of the parish), while east Jefferson is northern half. I know it doesn't make too much sense, but that's what the locals call it.
Logged
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
Posts: 17249
Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #236 on:
January 21, 2012, 03:05:36 pm »
Why not call the purple district Acadiana and the red district Florida Parishes?
Logged
http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com
Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #237 on:
January 22, 2012, 09:38:53 pm »
Okay, I took a stab at Maryland.
Blue (Harford-Eastern Shore): Population: 694,052 (3.83% underpopulated).
Green (Baltimore): Baltimore County has to be split. Since Baltimore City is underpopulated, it makes sense for one riding to be within the county, and one riding to pick up the remainder of the county and all of the city. Population: 699,199 (3.12% underpopulated).
Purple (Towson-Randallstown-Perry Hall): Population: 726,791 (0.71% overpopulated).
Red (Frederick-Hagerstown-Cumberland): Population: 653,133 (9.50% underpopulated).
Yellow (Bowie-St. Charles): This riding pairs southern Maryland with "outer" Prince George's County. Population 712,759 (1.24% underpopulated).
Teal (Annapolis-Ellicott City): This riding pairs Howard County with the more developed part of Anne Arundel County. Population: 745,430 (3.29% overpopulated).
Dim Gray (Fort Washington-Bethesda): This riding takes in all of Washington's immediate suburbs. Population: 769,718 (6.65% overpopulated).
Slate Blue (Rockville-Germantown): This riding is contained entirely within Montgomery County. Population: 772,470 (7.04% overpopulated).
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #238 on:
January 26, 2012, 01:49:45 pm »
I'm currently spending some time working on Texas. I'll want feedback on several of the rural ridings.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #239 on:
January 26, 2012, 11:32:37 pm »
TEXAS
Ridings, DRA color order:
Beaumont--Port Arthur--Livingston. Normally Tory, might be amenable to a Grit very occasionally. Formerly Grit.
Nacogdoches--Tyler--Marshall. Tory.
Texarkana--Denison. Tory.
Collin. Tory.
Denton. Tory.
Trinity River. Tory.
Dallas South--Grand Prairie. Formerly Grit, now Dipper.
Dallas Center. Formerly Grit, now Dipper, but might fall Tory in waves.
Dallas North--Mesquite--Garland. Tory.
Arlington. Tory.
Irving--Benbrook. Tory.
Fort Worth. Swingy, would more likely than not go Tory in 2011 but might more normally lean Grit. Would probably not go Dipper except with a very good, preferably Hispanic candidate.
Wichita Falls--Cleburne. One of the most hardcore Tory ridings in the entire country.
Waco. Usually Tory, would be open to the right Grit.
San Angelo--Hill Country--San Marcos. Tory, Tory, Tory.
Abilene--Amarillo. Tory as the day God made it.
Llano Estacado. Do I really even need to say it?
El Paso. Grit/Dipper?! Good heavens, really?!
Rio Grande. Whichever party the Hispanics in the area vote for, probably Dipper at this point, I would think.
Hidalgo. Almost as Grit/Dipper as Wichita Falls--Cleburne is Tory.
Brownsville--Corpus Christi. Somewhat marginal Grit, could go either Tory or Dipper in 2011.
Austin. Dipper to the core.
Round Rock--Pflugerville. Somewhat more marginal Tory than most non-urban, non-Hispanic Texas ridings, but still relatively safe.
San Antonio Center. Hardcore Dipper.
San Antonio North--Cross Mountain. Tory.
San Antonio South--Victoria. Tory.
Galveston--Matagorda. Tory.
Sugar Land--Rosenberg--Hempstead. Usually Tory.
College Station--The Woodlands. If possible, might actually be harder-line Tory than Wichita Falls--Cleburne.
Houston East. Tory.
Houston South East. Grit/Dipper.
Houston West. Tory.
Houston South West. Grit/Dipper.
Houston North Central. Grit/Dipper.
Houston North. Tory.
The Houston ridings could have 'Harris' substituted in their names. I'm really unsure about San Antonio South--Victoria but I don't know what else to do in that area.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
Posts: 17249
Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #240 on:
January 27, 2012, 12:55:45 am »
Houston should have a central riding, no?
Logged
http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com
Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #241 on:
January 27, 2012, 12:57:21 am »
If you look at a demographic map of Houston the ethnic communities of interest kind of radiate outward in sectors. I'll do another Harris map with a central riding, though, and we can decide which we like better.
ETA:
Houston Center, Houston East, Houston West, Harris East, Harris North, Harris West (or Houston East-Central, Houston West-Central, Houston East, Houston North, Houston West).
I really like the first way better. Houston just divides much more naturally into segments than it does into rings.
«
Last Edit: January 27, 2012, 01:11:39 am by Nathan
»
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
Posts: 17249
Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #242 on:
January 27, 2012, 01:39:15 am »
Maybe. But usually the central parts of cities tend to be politically different then the rest of the city. I must admit though, I don't know Houston that well.
Logged
http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com
Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14187
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #243 on:
January 27, 2012, 12:15:43 pm »
Quote from: Hatman on January 20, 2012, 01:29:04 pm
I also want to do provincial assemblies. I would combine state houses+senate into one assembly and divide the state up into as many districts. For example, Wyoming (60 House+30 Senate=90 MLAs)
I began doing this with Georgia, but was quickly overwhelmed at the prospect of drawing 236 district with a ~40k population each
manageable, certainly, but tough. Now, New Hampshire I'm sure
will
be essentially impossible.
Logged
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8975
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #244 on:
January 27, 2012, 12:54:46 pm »
Quote from: Hatman on January 27, 2012, 01:39:15 am
Maybe. But usually the central parts of cities tend to be politically different then the rest of the city. I must admit though, I don't know Houston that well.
Not really, in the case of Houston. Or rather, the left-leaning central part of Houston is large enough for several ridings, which are most naturally divided in sectors. Here's a demographic map of Harris County, for what it's worth:
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
Posts: 17249
Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #245 on:
January 27, 2012, 01:15:14 pm »
Quote from: Bacon King, VP on January 27, 2012, 12:15:43 pm
Quote from: Hatman on January 20, 2012, 01:29:04 pm
I also want to do provincial assemblies. I would combine state houses+senate into one assembly and divide the state up into as many districts. For example, Wyoming (60 House+30 Senate=90 MLAs)
I began doing this with Georgia, but was quickly overwhelmed at the prospect of drawing 236 district with a ~40k population each
manageable, certainly, but tough. Now, New Hampshire I'm sure
will
be essentially impossible.
Yeah, I gave up when I tried to do Vermont. Some of the precincts were larger than districts.
Logged
http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com
Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #246 on:
January 27, 2012, 06:52:06 pm »
Indiana:
Blue (Gary-Crown Point-Valparaiso): This riding consists of Lake and Porter Counties. Population: 660,348 (1.85% overpopulated).
Green (South Bend-Elkhart-La Porte): Population: 646,371 (0.31% underpopulated).
Purple (Fort Wayne-Warsaw): Wells and Adams Counties are only included because Wells County is in the
Fort Wayne Metropolitan Area,
and the riding to the south would look stupid if it still had Adams County. Population: 689,074 (6.28% overpopulated).
Red (Lafayette-Kokomo): Population: 626,446 (3.39% underpopulated).
Yellow (Muncie-Anderson): Population: 569,034 (12.24% underpopulated).
Teal (Indianapolis): Marion County is too populous for a riding, so it must be split. I
think
this map conforms mostly to township boundaries, but there are a couple of exclaves within the city proper. The northern part of the county is a better match to the city proper than the southern part, both politically and demographically. Population: 715,515 (10.35% overpopulated).
Dim Gray (Carmel-Plainfield-Greenwood): This may be a bit controversial, but it looks like the exurbs of Indianapolis are only in the parts of the outer counties nearest to the city. The outer parts of those counties appear rural. I feel that the exurbs would be better served if they are concentrated in a single riding rather than split between rural ridings. Population: 681,324 (5.08% overpopulated).
Slate Blue (Bloomington-Terre Haute): Population: 602,339 (7.11% underpopulated).
Cyan (Columbus-Seymour): Population: 616,533 (4.92% underpopulated).
Deep Pink (Evansville-Clarksville): Population: 676,818 (4.39% overpopulated).
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #247 on:
January 28, 2012, 03:02:51 pm »
And my offering for Ohio:
Blue (Lakewood-Parma-Solon): This is a suburban Cleveland riding contained entirely in Cuyahoga County. Brook Park is not split- that’s part of a Cleveland precinct. Population: 635,233 (15.63% overpopulated).
Green (Cleveland): The city of Cleveland gets paired with some of its eastern suburbs. Population: 644,889 (17.39% overpopulated).
Purple (Mentor-Kent): Lake, Geauga, and Portage Counties. Population: 484,849 (11.74% underpopulated).
Red (Akron): This riding contains all of Summit County. Population: 541,781 (1.38% underpopulated).
Gold (Youngstown-Warren-Ashtabula): Population: 550,632 (0.23% overpopulated).
Teal (Lorain-Medina): Population: 473,688 (13.78% underpopulated).
Dim Gray (Canton-Columbiana): Carroll County is (inexplicably) in the Canton MSA, so the riding went east instead of west. Population: 581,972 (5.94% overpopulated)
Slate Blue (Toledo-Bowling Green): Population: 567,303 (3.27% overpopulated)
Cyan (Dayton): Population: 535,153 (2.59% underpopulated).
Deep Pink (New Philadelphia-Zanesville-Athens): Population: 548,842 (0.09% underpopulated).
Chartreuse (Mansfield-Wooster): Population: 540,533 (1.61% underpopulated).
Cornflower Blue (Outer Columbus): Anyone who has worked with DRA knows that precincts in Columbus are a nightmare to deal with. Yes, this isn’t technically contiguous, but it’s the best I’m willing to go for. Frankly, I’m surprised I was able to get it looking as good as it does. Population: 580,663 (5.70% overpopulated).
Dark Salmon (Columbus Centre): Population: 582,751 (6.08% overpopulated).
Olive (Delaware-Newark-Lancaster): Exurban Columbus riding. Population: 486,862 (11.38% underpopulated).
Dark Orange (Chillicothe-Portsmouth): Population: 552,149 (0.51% overpopulated).
Lime (Cincinnati): The northern suburbs, in my view, best match the demographics and politics of the city proper. After that, I took the eastern suburbs to bring it up to population. Population: 596,131 (8.51% overpopulated).
Dark Slate Blue (Hamilton-Middletown): The leftovers from Hamilton County get paired with Butler County. Population: 574,373 (4.55% overpopulated).
Yellow (Mason-Loveland-Wilmington): I’m not thrilled with this riding, but I don’t know how to improve it. Suggestions are welcome. Population: 481,126 (12.43% underpopulated).
Yellow-Green (Springfield-Xenia-Troy): Preble, Miami, and Greene Counties are in the Dayton MSA, so I felt that they belong in the same riding. Population 497,641 (9.41% underpopulated).
Pink (Sandusky-Findlay): Being not so familiar with rural Ohio, it may be desirable to shift some territory between this riding, the Mansfield riding, and the Lima riding. Again, I’m open to suggestions. Population: 575,310 (4.72% overpopulated).
Maroon (Lima-Urbana): Population: 504,623 (8.14% underpopulated).
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
Posts: 17249
Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #248 on:
January 28, 2012, 05:56:23 pm »
Outer Columbus looks contiguous to me. I wouldn't call it outer Columbus though, perhaps I'd name the riding after the county.
Logged
http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com
Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
Posts: 4410
Re: US with Canadian parties
«
Reply #249 on:
January 28, 2012, 09:00:06 pm »
Quote from: Hatman on January 28, 2012, 05:56:23 pm
Outer Columbus looks contiguous to me.
There are some exclaves. The city has a ton of them. It's really unavoidable.
Quote
I wouldn't call it outer Columbus though, perhaps I'd name the riding after the county.
Franklin? I guess that could work.
Logged
Seriously, it was time to change back to the real avatar.
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
[
10
]
11
12
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...