Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2013, 06:48:03 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  Help needed for 2012 National Congressional Map
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Print
Author Topic: Help needed for 2012 National Congressional Map  (Read 9076 times)
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #75 on: February 13, 2012, 01:49:25 am »
Ignore

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL

Yep. TX-02 has an interesting crescent moon shape and 18 is similar to its current form.

Here's the TX plan.

I agree. Redistricting should be taken out of the hands of legislatures.
Logged


asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9117


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: February 13, 2012, 01:52:56 am »
Ignore

Virginia added.

Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #77 on: February 13, 2012, 01:56:29 am »
Ignore

Great!
Logged


asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9117


View Profile
« Reply #78 on: February 13, 2012, 01:59:05 am »
Ignore

Within ten days or so I should think we'll be able to say we've at least tentatively filled in everything south of Raritan Bay and west of Lake Erie.
Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
jimrtex
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5118
France


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: February 13, 2012, 04:38:31 am »
Ignore

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL

Yep. TX-02 has an interesting crescent moon shape and 18 is similar to its current form.

Here's the TX plan.

I agree. Redistricting should be taken out of the hands of legislatures.

Congressman Barton's interesting proposal

It makes TX-20 the San Antonio to Austin district, and adds TX=35 as a Laredo to San Antonio district that surrounds TX-20.
Logged
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #80 on: February 13, 2012, 04:47:28 am »
Ignore

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL

Yep. TX-02 has an interesting crescent moon shape and 18 is similar to its current form.

Here's the TX plan.

I agree. Redistricting should be taken out of the hands of legislatures.

Congressman Barton's interesting proposal

It makes TX-20 the San Antonio to Austin district, and adds TX=35 as a Laredo to San Antonio district that surrounds TX-20.

The DFW districts are hideous under Barton's plan.

I hate how Travis county is cracked 5 ways with both plans Tongue
Logged


MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #81 on: February 21, 2012, 04:46:02 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota!

Logged


I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 929
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #82 on: February 21, 2012, 05:05:28 pm »
Ignore

Great job Miles! This is awesome!
Logged

MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #83 on: February 21, 2012, 08:47:03 pm »
Ignore

Here are the ratings I've come up with:



Without NY, FL and NH, the Republicans are up by 30 seats, 194-164.
Logged


jimrtex
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5118
France


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: February 21, 2012, 08:47:27 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota!



What is the hangup in NH?
Logged
Senator Gass3268
Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2257
United States


View Profile
« Reply #85 on: February 22, 2012, 02:43:15 pm »
Ignore

Here are the ratings I've come up with:



Without NY, FL and NH, the Republicans are up by 30 seats, 194-164.

How many tossups do you have? Also I would probably put the Wisconsin 7th into the tossup group. His district was made a bit more favorable to him, but this is still predominately the same district that sent Dave Obey to Congress from 1969 to 2011, about 75%. Also Obama won the district, under the new lines, 56-43.
Logged
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9117


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: February 22, 2012, 02:46:38 pm »
Ignore

I count 21 tossups on Miles's map.

I agree on WI-07. All of the Lake Superior districts are pretty competitive this year (I personally tend to think Cravaack will lose and Duffy will hold on; not sure about Benishek).
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 02:53:18 pm by Nathan »Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #87 on: February 22, 2012, 05:14:22 pm »
Ignore

WI-07 is actually now 53.1% Obama, down from 55.8%. The Republicans gave Kind a pass in order to shore-up Duffy. If I recall, this district wasn't very high on Steve Israel's Red-to-Blue list either. The district is still very much in Democrats' reach, but I think the DCCC is focusing its energy elsewhere. So, I'll give Duffy the benefit of the doubt here.

I do agree with Nathan that Cravaack is more likely to lose. AT the state level, WI-07 seems to be swingy, but MN-08 is reliably Democrat.

Eh, I just noticed that UT-04 should be Lean D, not Strong D. I'll have an updated map in a few weeks though.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 05:16:12 pm by MilesC56 »Logged


Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12060


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: February 22, 2012, 08:23:28 pm »
Ignore

Isn't Duffy kind of a weak incumbent? He had plenty of not-ready-for-prime-time moments in 2011. Yes, he's young and dynamic and all that but he's no Aaron Schock and he doesn't have Schock's district,
Logged
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5163


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: February 23, 2012, 12:00:10 am »
Ignore

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL

Yep. TX-02 has an interesting crescent moon shape and 18 is similar to its current form.

Here's the TX plan.

I agree. Redistricting should be taken out of the hands of legislatures.

Congressman Barton's interesting proposal

It makes TX-20 the San Antonio to Austin district, and adds TX=35 as a Laredo to San Antonio district that surrounds TX-20.

The DFW districts are hideous under Barton's plan.

I hate how Travis county is cracked 5 ways with both plans Tongue

What an interesting map. The Houston area still sucks for the GOP (2, 8, 36 are megapacks). They could at least make the Denton to Tarrant finger cleaner.
Logged
timothyinMD
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 441


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: February 23, 2012, 01:49:35 am »
Ignore

AR 1 toss up but PA 12 Leans Dem?  Hah, seriously?
Logged
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #91 on: February 23, 2012, 02:15:06 am »
Ignore

AR 1 toss up but PA 12 Leans Dem?  Hah, seriously?

Yes...

Would you care to show us your map?
Logged


Fuzzy
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3740
United States


View Profile
« Reply #92 on: February 23, 2012, 04:53:44 am »
Ignore

AR 1 toss up but PA 12 Leans Dem?  Hah, seriously?

Yes...

Would you care to show us your map?

It's on!  Cheesy
Logged

My avatar is as dark as my soul.
Senator Gass3268
Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2257
United States


View Profile
« Reply #93 on: February 23, 2012, 04:20:08 pm »
Ignore

AR 1 toss up but PA 12 Leans Dem?  Hah, seriously?

Yes...

Would you care to show us your map?

It's on!  Cheesy

Like Donkey Kong!
Logged
Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: February 23, 2012, 05:30:51 pm »
Ignore

Things have now become very much like Donkey Kong.
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21445
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22

View Profile
« Reply #95 on: February 23, 2012, 09:18:31 pm »
Ignore

Miles, did you put Roskam as lean GOP?
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #96 on: February 23, 2012, 09:27:09 pm »
Ignore

Miles, did you put Roskam as lean GOP?

Yes. He's running in a 51% Obama district down from 56%. Probably Strong R.
Logged


Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21445
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22

View Profile
« Reply #97 on: February 23, 2012, 09:34:35 pm »
Ignore

Making my own right now, changes so far:

CO-06 - Tossup > Lean GOP Coffman seems like a reasonable guy. Obama could sink him of course, but that is the only way I see him losing. Now if Tancredo were still here, it would be strong Dem.
IA-04 - Tossup > Lean GOP  King is weak, but he is still an incumbent
ILL-06 - Lean GOP > Strong GOP Roskam is a strong GOP incumbent in a GOP pack seat
ILL-13? - Tossup > Lean GOP Need more information, but from what I read earlier, it didn't sound like things were going that well in getting Johnson ousted, but we'll see.
NV-03 - Tossup > Lean GOP Heck will have a tough race, but most of the reviews of his campaign ability I have seen are positive.
NV-04 - Lean Dem > Strong Dem I don't think the GOP is even gonna try here, not with Presidential turnout
UT-02? - Strong Dem > to Lean Dem. It is a heavily GOP seat, in a presidential year, and it is newly redrawn. Sure, Matheson is all that and has been through this before, but I am not ready to declare it a certainty.
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21445
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22

View Profile
« Reply #98 on: February 23, 2012, 09:39:30 pm »
Ignore

Miles, did you put Roskam as lean GOP?

Yes. He's running in a 51% Obama district down from 56%. Probably Strong R.

Aside from gaining a bunch of new territory, I don't see why he would have trouble. In 2008, he got 58% in a district Obama came in around the mid 50's, now it is 51% Obama. And the new territory is Republican leaning stuff from the old 8th. I think the Dems will focus on the 8th, 10th and 11th in that area of the state, and 12th, 13th and 17th downstate.
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8627
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48

View Profile WWW
« Reply #99 on: February 23, 2012, 09:52:00 pm »
Ignore

UT-02? - Strong Dem > to Lean Dem. It is a heavily GOP seat, in a presidential year, and it is newly redrawn. Sure, Matheson is all that and has been through this before, but I am not ready to declare it a certainty.

I should have put Matheson's district as Lean D too, instead of Safe D.
Logged


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory