Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2014, 12:25:46 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | |-+  The Election of 2000: Santorum v. Shaheen
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Poll
Question: Should this timeline continue?
Yes   -14 (63.6%)
No   -8 (36.4%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: The Election of 2000: Santorum v. Shaheen  (Read 2276 times)
Mynheer Peeperkorn
Peeperkorn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1583
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: -8.35

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2011, 03:23:12 am »
Ignore

I can see Romney winning 2004 in a landslide.

Nah, I see Romney winning in 2008 after voter fatigue and a financial crisis produce a historic win, and then miraculous economic recovery from voodoo economics leads to a Reaganesque victory in 2012.

We should open a poll in this timeline: a) "Romney 2004" or b) "Romney 2008".
Logged
NHI
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2884


P
View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2011, 11:30:15 am »
Ignore

Governor Huckabee announced to the surprise of many that his running mate would be John McCain, the twice presidential candidate and Senator from Arizona.
"I want someone beside me in the White House who may disagree with me at time, but will a voice of reason and clear judgement. John McCain is that person and he will be the next Vice President of The United States."

The nomination of Mike Huckabee came as a shock to the political establishment. Being a grassroots candidates most never expected him to make it to the primaries and caucuses, but by pulling off quite an upset he proved he was tough competition, even when facing a relatively popular incumbent.

Matchup:
Shaheen: 50%
Huckabee: 41%

Though Shaheen had the successful campaign in Afghanistan the US economy was slowly starting to weaken. In order to dodge it as an issue during the election Shaheen played her strengths on National Security, and how she was best prepared to keep America safe in a still uncertain world.

"My opponent believes that by attacking me and not discussing the real issue he can win. We'll I've got some news for him. That isn't the way politics work and it's not the way America works. Gov. Huckabee is time for you to come clear. State your positions and let the American people decide!"


Despite the interest in Huckabee, Shaheen led him throughout much of the campaign and the three presidential debates did not change much. Shaheen and Huckabee remained on their talking points, though Huckabee did charge Shaheen for beginning the withdrawal from Afghanistan too soon.

However, by election night Shaheen was able to meet expectations and did win reelections, but by a much closer margin than most pundits had predicted. The charming Huckabee managed to win back Florida, West Virginia, Iowa and Nevada. Going into election most expected Shaheen to come out with at least a ten point win over Huckabee, but the election night results proved the polls were wrong. Huckabee came within spitting distance of Shaheen in the electoral and popular votes.

Shaheen: 277 (49.9%)
Huckabee: 261 (48.4%)


Close States:
Ohio:
Shaheen: 49.6%
Huckabee: 49.0%

Pennsylvania:
Shaheen: 49.9%
Huckabee: 48.7%

New Mexico:
Shaheen: 50.9%
Huckabee: 48.5%

Iowa:
Huckabee: 50.0%
Shaheen: 48.7%

Nevada:
Huckabee: 50.2%
Shaheen: 48.8%


For the first time in more than fifty years the same party held onto the White House for more than twelve years. The longest being twenty years from 1933-1953, during the administrations of Roosevelt and Truman.

Having won reelection Shaheen headed into her second term still with Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, though as her second term got under way the grip held by the Democratic party was beginning to weaken...

Logged

‎"Our president thinks this country's in decline. It is if he's president. It's not if I'm president." -- Mitt Romney

NHI
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2884


P
View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 01, 2012, 08:53:52 am »
Ignore

This Timeline is not dead, just on hiatus for an undetermined amount of time...Something better will becoming in the new year.
Logged

‎"Our president thinks this country's in decline. It is if he's president. It's not if I'm president." -- Mitt Romney

MATTROSE94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1271
United States


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2012, 02:24:35 pm »
Ignore

I know that this timeline has not been updated in several moths, but I feel that the thought of having Rick Santorum as president on 9/11 would be pretty scary.
Logged

Thankfully the 5th amendment implicitly approves of the concept of executing hoodlums.


OK
I WILL FOCUS ON WIN THE rACES
THANK YOU
YOU JUST MADE MY DAD GO BUTTER
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2426
United States


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2012, 08:26:03 pm »
Ignore

I know that this timeline has not been updated in several moths, but I feel that the thought of having Rick Santorum as president on 9/11 would be pretty scary.

For the terrorists.  Expect a full on holy war, the Tenth Crusade.  He would probably start up the draft again too.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

Skyrim now, Skyrim tomorrow, Morrowind Forever!

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
Governor: Brown (CA), Corbett (PA), Scott (FL)
House: Emken (CA)
Other: Rob McCoy (CA Assembly)
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines