Does THIS thread have a point? I don't mean to harp on Badger, but the past few posts have been "an utter waste of bandwidth to the point" that poster's "lousy attitude isn't even with the comedy effect."
How about we don't try to stoop to the lowest common denominator?
The argument for banning CaDan is as weak as the argument for banning Libertas. In short it's an argument of "hurr he says things I don't like!" and "he's annoying". Such arguments that I believe to be insufficient for a banning.
Actually I don't think there are many reasons sufficient for banning. There might be one or two cases made for it, but those reasons would have to far exceed the extraordinary.