George W. Bush vs. Bill Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:34:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  George W. Bush vs. Bill Clinton		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for?
#1
George W. Bush		  
#2
Bill Clinton		  
#3
Abstain		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: George W. Bush vs. Bill Clinton  (Read 6402 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 31, 2004, 10:31:33 AM »
No third parties. Only two candidates in the race.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2004, 10:41:22 AM »
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2004, 10:42:13 AM »
The map is 333-205
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2004, 10:47:19 AM »
Clinton wins by a combfortable margin electorally, but but a smaller margin in the popular vote.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,419
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2004, 11:13:04 AM »
something like the 1996 map.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2004, 11:18:19 AM »

Clinton would win Colorado and Virginia.  He would also have a good shot at North Carolina, Arizona, West Virginia, and Louisiana.
Logged
Josh
cyberlord
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 386


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2004, 11:20:22 AM »
Definitely have to say Clinton, by a pretty large electoral margin.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2004, 11:21:45 AM »
Oh, okay. Well here's my map:



DC is really a tossup.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2004, 11:23:09 AM »
Quote from: Senator True Democrat on December 31, 2004, 11:18:19 AM

Clinton would win Colorado and Virginia.  He would also have a good shot at North Carolina, Arizona, West Virginia, and Louisiana.



That's 405-133
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2004, 11:27:02 AM »
This isn't the "who can make the worst map?" topic. Besides, I already won. The notion that Clinton could win Virginia or North Carolina is complete idiocy.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 31, 2004, 12:01:20 PM »
1992
Virginia
Bush 45.0
Clinton 40.6
Perot 13.6

North Carolina
Bush 43.4
Clinton 42.7
Perot 13.7

1996
Virginia
Dole 47.1
Clinton 45.2
Perot 6.6

North Carolina
Dole 48.7
Clinton 44.0
Perot 6.7

Sheer lunacy, indeed.

Personally, do I think Clinton would win these states?  No, but it would be very close.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 31, 2004, 12:12:53 PM »
Quote from: nini2287 on December 31, 2004, 12:01:20 PM
1992
Virginia
Bush 45.0
Clinton 40.6
Perot 13.6

North Carolina
Bush 43.4
Clinton 42.7
Perot 13.7

1996
Virginia
Dole 47.1
Clinton 45.2
Perot 6.6

North Carolina
Dole 48.7
Clinton 44.0
Perot 6.7

Sheer lunacy, indeed.

Personally, do I think Clinton would win these states? No, but it would be very close.


Clinton came close to winning Virginia without getting a majority in Fairfax county.  If Kerry can win Fairfax, so can Clinton.  Coupled with Clinton's numbers in southern and western Virginia, he should be able to win Virginia.  North Carolina would be much closer than Virginia.  He made it a four point margin when Perot did not do very well.  A large influx of northerners have moved to North Carolina, like Virginia, making it possible for Clinton to win.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 31, 2004, 12:27:08 PM »
The way Fairfax votes is irrelevant. I agree that he could win that.

1. The Perot factor
2. Bush is a lot more popular than Dole
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 31, 2004, 07:30:06 PM »

There are no write ins.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 31, 2004, 09:59:46 PM »
And right now, Bill Clinton seems to be winning all 538 EVs. Seriously Philip, you read too much Ann Coulter.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 31, 2004, 10:05:59 PM »
Yes, because this is a scientific survey.

I don't read Ann Coulter.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,026
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 31, 2004, 10:25:39 PM »
Clinton would've definately won Virginia in 1996 if it had the same demographics and voting patters of today (after all he would've won Fairfax). He probably could've won Colorado too. He would've lost Kentucky. But Bush wouldn't do as poorly as Dole. Regardless he'd still lose.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2004, 10:33:28 PM »
Yeah, he would have won Fairfax. And LOST a series of other counties, and the GOP would have dominated the other portions of the state. It is more Republican now.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2004, 10:38:02 PM »
Clinton would carry all his '96 states minus Kentucky, while gaining Colorado and maybe Virginia.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2005, 04:05:12 AM »
Toguh call IMO. Clinton had a few "STAINS" left. If he was running after the MONICA thing, I think Bush would beat him.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 01, 2005, 05:03:41 AM »
Quote from: Chief of Staff Mike Naso on January 01, 2005, 04:05:12 AM
Toguh call IMO. Clinton had a few "STAINS" left. If he was running after the MONICA thing, I think Bush would beat him.

Are you kidding? Clinton left office with higher approval ratings than Bush can now dream of.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 01, 2005, 05:18:34 AM »
WV always gave Bubba some of his best approval ratings
Logged
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 01, 2005, 06:14:42 AM »
Quote from: Philip on December 31, 2004, 11:21:45 AM
Oh, okay. Well here's my map:



DC is really a tossup.

You wish!
Logged
George W. Bush
eversole_Adam
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 906


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 01, 2005, 01:45:47 PM »
 I think Clinton would Losse, Arizona, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia and Louisiana. He would Pick up Colorado.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 01, 2005, 02:25:07 PM »
Quote from: Chief of Staff Mike Naso on January 01, 2005, 04:05:12 AM
Toguh call IMO. Clinton had a few "STAINS" left. If he was running after the MONICA thing, I think Bush would beat him.

The day you predict a Democratic victory will be the day pigs fly.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.