Official January 7th Debate Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:25:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Official January 7th Debate Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7
Author Topic: Official January 7th Debate Thread  (Read 15763 times)
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: January 07, 2012, 10:39:50 PM »


Appealed to a whole bunch of voters not voting in the GOP primaries.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: January 07, 2012, 10:40:02 PM »


I tend to agree.  When you investigate what actually happened there, it's a goldmine.  Certainly enough to turn any independent conservative like myself from ever thinking about voting for him.

What was improper with what Bain did again?  I mean taking over sick companies, and trying to resuscitate them, and if they can't be profitably reanimated, killing them off, seems to be benign creative resurrection and destruction to me. It is what drives productive capitalism Sam. Surely you know this.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: January 07, 2012, 10:40:50 PM »


Appealed to a whole bunch of voters not voting in the GOP primaries.

I don't think those people even vote in US elections, at least not legally.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: January 07, 2012, 10:41:18 PM »

Can someone translate what Hunstman just said?
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,705
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: January 07, 2012, 10:41:45 PM »

Best debate question ever.
"Basketball game...I mean football!" LOL Gingrich
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: January 07, 2012, 10:42:09 PM »

Best debate question ever.
"Basketball game...I mean football!" LOL Gingrich
It's not even until the 9th!
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: January 07, 2012, 10:42:51 PM »

Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: January 07, 2012, 10:43:28 PM »

Should have said the Wild Card game. Would have sounded better.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: January 07, 2012, 10:43:28 PM »


I tend to agree.  When you investigate what actually happened there, it's a goldmine.  Certainly enough to turn any independent conservative like myself from ever thinking about voting for him.

What was improper with what Bain did again?  I mean taking over sick companies, and trying to resuscitate them, and if they can't be profitably reanimated, killing them off, seems to be benign creative resurrection and destruction to me. It is what drives productive capitalism Sam. Surely you know this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/romneys-bain-capital-record-shows-mixed-record-on-bankruptcies/2011/12/13/gIQANksluO_story.html
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: January 07, 2012, 10:43:38 PM »

The only way that could have made Newt look worse would be if he said soccer.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: January 07, 2012, 10:44:18 PM »


I tend to agree.  When you investigate what actually happened there, it's a goldmine.  Certainly enough to turn any independent conservative like myself from ever thinking about voting for him.

What was improper with what Bain did again?  I mean taking over sick companies, and trying to resuscitate them, and if they can't be profitably reanimated, killing them off, seems to be benign creative resurrection and destruction to me. It is what drives productive capitalism Sam. Surely you know this.

Yep. And what is the alternative to American free enterprise as exemplified by Bain Capital, for example? More and more government intrusion into people's most essential decisions (i.e., what to produce and what to consume)? No thank you.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: January 07, 2012, 10:44:31 PM »

So where was Gingrich's blistering attacks on Romney?
Logged
The Ex-Factor
xfactor99
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,241
Viet Nam


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: January 07, 2012, 10:45:38 PM »

Can someone translate what Hunstman just said?

Just like he said after it was "he doesn't understand the situation." However when I initially heard it I thought he butchered the last word (said something like "qingsheng" instead of qingkuang 情况) so someone gimme a link so I can hear it again.
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: January 07, 2012, 10:46:19 PM »

So where was Gingrich's blistering attacks on Romney?

Maybe in 12 hours on NBC. They'll all be tired and cranky.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: January 07, 2012, 10:46:47 PM »

So where was Gingrich's blistering attacks on Romney?

He tried a time or two, but nobody cares anymore. Everybody just wants Newt to go away for good. Hopefully he will lose spectacularly in New Hampshire and South Carolina.
Logged
Reginald
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 802
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: January 07, 2012, 10:48:14 PM »

They really force the audience to stay in their seats to listen to the post-debate analysis?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,944


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: January 07, 2012, 10:48:52 PM »

I'm sure the Obama campaign has been doing nothing but oppo research on the kind of shady business Romney was up to at Bain Capital. Keep in mind that no Republican candidate has been spending any money on opposition research. There's probably a goldmine of stuff there.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: January 07, 2012, 10:50:28 PM »

Im glad i kept the Saints/Lions game on during the debate.  Much more exciting
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: January 07, 2012, 10:51:22 PM »

Truman Capote refrence? Did not see that coming.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: January 07, 2012, 10:52:08 PM »

I'm so surprised how cordial it has remained between Romney and Paul - they never really go after each other. A great mystery.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: January 07, 2012, 10:54:15 PM »

I'm so surprised how cordial it has remained between Romney and Paul - they never really go after each other. A great mystery.

I think it's fairly clear that Paul sees Romney as the best of the bad candidates (other than himself).  Plus, malleability makes him more open to the libertarian wing's influence than the socons would be.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: January 07, 2012, 10:56:48 PM »


I tend to agree.  When you investigate what actually happened there, it's a goldmine.  Certainly enough to turn any independent conservative like myself from ever thinking about voting for him.

What was improper with what Bain did again?  I mean taking over sick companies, and trying to resuscitate them, and if they can't be profitably reanimated, killing them off, seems to be benign creative resurrection and destruction to me. It is what drives productive capitalism Sam. Surely you know this.

What Mitt did is precisely the same thing that is bringing this country to its knees - crony capitalism.

Basically, when you study the history of Romney and Bain Capital, you come up with this - his “brilliance” at business is mostly a result of his connections.  Much like those who've gone to the various high-end business schools, he thinks he's the smartest person in the room by following this rule: "Why worry? I got mine, you got yours, I’ll be gone and you’ll be gone when this crap blows up."  That attitude, so common among the private equity crowd, is what is destroying us.

Romney and Bain Capital have a history of sacking people and then have an even longer history of installing stupid management into companies - people who had no clue what they were managing.  In other words, they put their idiot buddies into startups and turn-around situations, and didn't care about the actual result so long as they made a return on their investment through levered debt and equity positions in a company. 

Obama is simply waiting to paint Romney as Gordon Gekko, and it'll be quite easy based on what I've looked at.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: January 07, 2012, 10:57:09 PM »

I'm so surprised how cordial it has remained between Romney and Paul - they never really go after each other. A great mystery.

I think it's fairly clear that Paul sees Romney as the best of the bad candidates (other than himself).  Plus, malleability makes him more open to the libertarian wing's influence than the socons would be.

This. And would anybody be truly shocked if Romney chose Rand Paul, the only Tea Party candidate of 2010 to win a US Senate seat, as his running mate?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: January 07, 2012, 10:57:49 PM »


I tend to agree.  When you investigate what actually happened there, it's a goldmine.  Certainly enough to turn any independent conservative like myself from ever thinking about voting for him.

What was improper with what Bain did again?  I mean taking over sick companies, and trying to resuscitate them, and if they can't be profitably reanimated, killing them off, seems to be benign creative resurrection and destruction to me. It is what drives productive capitalism Sam. Surely you know this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/romneys-bain-capital-record-shows-mixed-record-on-bankruptcies/2011/12/13/gIQANksluO_story.html

As I said, after making one's best efforts, sometimes things just don't work out, and you cut your loses, because the companies cannot be made profitable, and you BK them. Clearly Mitt had a good batting average overall. If you "win" every time, you are probably a Bernie Madoff type. Taking on highly risky companies means that sometimes, the wrong tail of the bell curve will rear its ugly head.

Is anyone confused by this concept? Heck, I have lost money sometimes on real estate, and trust me, I am very careful man on this sort of thing, unlike on some other matters. Smiley

If the voters cannot understand this, they deserve "Obamanomics," from here to eternity.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: January 07, 2012, 10:58:47 PM »

I'm so surprised how cordial it has remained between Romney and Paul - they never really go after each other. A great mystery.

I think it's fairly clear that Paul sees Romney as the best of the bad candidates (other than himself).  Plus, malleability makes him more open to the libertarian wing's influence than the socons would be.

This. And would anybody be truly shocked if Romney chose Rand Paul, the only Tea Party candidate of 2010 to win a US Senate seat, as his running mate?

That actually makes a fair amount of sense.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.