Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 05:33:02 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
International Elections
(Moderator:
Sibboleth
)
UK local by-elections 2012
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
[
8
]
9
10
11
Author
Topic: UK local by-elections 2012 (Read 14184 times)
Senator MaxQue
MaxQue
YaBB God
Posts: 6530
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #175 on:
August 17, 2012, 02:44:34 pm »
Quote from: Minion of Midas on August 17, 2012, 01:35:04 pm
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 16, 2012, 06:16:52 pm
Tendring, St Bartholomews (changes since Mar 2012 by-election in italics)
Residents 87.8 (+14.5)
(+15.1)
Con 12.2 (-14.5)
(-7.1)
Fascinating. One wonders about the national ramifications of this result.
Improssive, since the election was to replace the Resident who won in March and resigned.
Logged
joevsimp
Full Member
Posts: 168
Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #176 on:
August 18, 2012, 04:14:17 am »
Quote from: Chemistry & Sleep Deprivation on August 17, 2012, 02:44:34 pm
Quote from: Minion of Midas on August 17, 2012, 01:35:04 pm
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 16, 2012, 06:16:52 pm
Tendring, St Bartholomews (changes since Mar 2012 by-election in italics)
Residents 87.8 (+14.5)
(+15.1)
Con 12.2 (-14.5)
(-7.1)
Fascinating. One wonders about the national ramifications of this result.
Clacton's a weird place, not as weird as Stoke on Trent, but the whole Tendring coast is just slightly odd in lots of differentways
Improssive, since the election was to replace the Resident who won in March and resigned.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #177 on:
August 18, 2012, 04:28:17 am »
I was being facetious. A Residents vs Conservatives by-election is about as irrelevant (unless control of the council is involved) as things can possibly get, and the result suggests a clear difference in candidate quality visible to all.
I didn't even read the Holy Word on it.
"The problem with irony is that not everybody gets it" [quote Ray Wylie Hubbard, as introduction to his wonderful song "Screw you, we're from Texas"]
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 53010
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #178 on:
August 18, 2012, 05:49:05 am »
Quote from: Minion of Midas on August 18, 2012, 04:28:17 am
I was being facetious. A Residents vs Conservatives by-election is about as irrelevant (unless control of the council is involved)
...and even then...
Logged
'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
Leftbehind
YaBB God
Posts: 1607
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #179 on:
August 18, 2012, 11:02:38 am »
I've asked this before, but what's the deal with Residents/Ratepayers Associations? Did they fall under the anti-socialist or the Independent category in the post-war period? Presumably they vary too - I know the Solihull Ratepayers association are linked to the Taxpayers Alliance, but surely they aren't all as right-wing?
Logged
E: -8.26 S: -3.3
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 53010
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #180 on:
August 18, 2012, 12:48:01 pm »
They started springing up in the 20s and 30s in order to oppose Wasteful Socialist Spending in municipal affairs. Which was ridiculous given Labour's weakness in local government outside the coalfields and extreme concentrations of heavy industry during the period, but privet hedges have a hallucinogenic effect on people or something. They were generally Ratepayers Associations back then; the switch to Residents Associations came about after the Thatchermajor government did what it did to local government finance. A related, though different and very much extinct, phenomenon were local Anti Socialist parties in county boroughs and larger urban districts where Labour were strong, or at least strong
enough
to cause concern about vote splitting. These were generally coalitions of Tories, Liberals and assorted local business interests and went by a wide variety of different names in different places; 'Progressives' (especially in Scottish burghs, but also on Tyneside), 'Anti-Socialists', 'Moderates', 'Citizens', etc. The older Conservative local machines in Birmingham ('Unionists') and London ('Municipal Reform') sort of became like that in practice, even if their roots were quite different.
Logged
'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
Gary J
Jr. Member
Posts: 58
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #181 on:
August 18, 2012, 07:10:49 pm »
An example of how party politics infiltrated the smaller urban areas in England, is what happened in Slough.
Slough Urban District Council had strong Labour results, in several elections before the First World War. It may be that traditional Independent candidates, contesting polls as individuals, had a problem dealing with even a comparatively weak party organisation. Labour did not have such success again until the post Second World War era, by when the town was much bigger and a Municipal Borough (given Borough status in 1938).
After the War, when local elections resumed, local politicians opposed to Labour reorganised themselves. There was a group, who still contested elections as Independents, but were actually a local political party combining national Conservatives and Liberals in an effective anti-Labour alliance. They had ties to a national federation. The occasional genuine Independent candidate tended to poll very few votes.
It was after the Second World War that first Conservative and then Liberal party candidates began to challenge the Independents, who rapidly declined and disappeared. The last Independent Councillor was elected in 1950, without Conservative opposition. The last Independent Alderman, in the early 1950s, was only reelected for his last term after promising to follow the Conservative party line in the Council chamber.
Logged
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #182 on:
August 30, 2012, 05:41:30 pm »
Bridgend, Bettws
Lab 79.9 (+3.6)
Ind 15.5 (+15.5)
Green 2.6 (-21.1)
Con 1.9 (+1.9)
(via
https://twitter.com/DRC1649/status/241292519747489792
)
«
Last Edit: August 31, 2012, 06:05:13 am by ObserverIE
»
Logged
joevsimp
Full Member
Posts: 168
Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #183 on:
September 01, 2012, 08:46:43 am »
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 30, 2012, 05:41:30 pm
Bridgend, Bettws
Lab 79.9 (+3.6)
Ind 15.5 (+15.5)
Green 2.6 (-21.1)
Con 1.9 (+1.9)
(via
https://twitter.com/DRC1649/status/241292519747489792
)
that's a pretty steep drop but how did the greens manage to get 23.7% in Bridgend, was it just us, Labour and the Tories?
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #184 on:
September 01, 2012, 08:58:15 am »
Quote from: joevsimp on September 01, 2012, 08:46:43 am
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 30, 2012, 05:41:30 pm
Bridgend, Bettws
Lab 79.9 (+3.6)
Ind 15.5 (+15.5)
Green 2.6 (-21.1)
Con 1.9 (+1.9)
(via
https://twitter.com/DRC1649/status/241292519747489792
)
that's a pretty steep drop but how did the greens manage to get 23.7% in Bridgend, was it just us, Labour and the Tories?
Yes, except without Tories.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #185 on:
September 01, 2012, 04:30:53 pm »
Quote from: Minion of Midas on September 01, 2012, 08:58:15 am
Quote from: joevsimp on September 01, 2012, 08:46:43 am
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 30, 2012, 05:41:30 pm
Bridgend, Bettws
Lab 79.9 (+3.6)
Ind 15.5 (+15.5)
Green 2.6 (-21.1)
Con 1.9 (+1.9)
(via
https://twitter.com/DRC1649/status/241292519747489792
)
that's a pretty steep drop but how did the greens manage to get 23.7% in Bridgend, was it just us, Labour and the Tories?
Yes, except without Tories.
The "anyone but Labour" vote has coalesced around the available candidate, and in May, the Greens were "it":
2004: Lab 70.7 Ind 17.2 Lib Dem 12.2
2008: Lab 82.3 Lib Dem 17.7
2012: Lab 76.3 Green 23.7
Logged
Die-hard Clockworkfan
andrewteale
Sr. Member
Posts: 490
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #186 on:
September 01, 2012, 06:38:32 pm »
I did write a Holy Word for Bettws but it seems Britain-Votes never published it.
Logged
http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/
- UK local election results since 2002.
Quote from: Minion of Midas on February 03, 2012, 05:50:26 am
There cannot have been a by-election here, as I didn't see an Andrew Teale writeup on it. Or else that by-election's validity should be challenged on the grounds that it was held without Andrew's written approval.
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #187 on:
September 06, 2012, 05:58:05 am »
The Holy Word
returns
.
Logged
joevsimp
Full Member
Posts: 168
Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #188 on:
September 06, 2012, 01:10:54 pm »
Quote from: ObserverIE on September 01, 2012, 04:30:53 pm
Quote from: Minion of Midas on September 01, 2012, 08:58:15 am
Quote from: joevsimp on September 01, 2012, 08:46:43 am
Quote from: ObserverIE on August 30, 2012, 05:41:30 pm
Bridgend, Bettws
Lab 79.9 (+3.6)
Ind 15.5 (+15.5)
Green 2.6 (-21.1)
Con 1.9 (+1.9)
(via
https://twitter.com/DRC1649/status/241292519747489792
)
that's a pretty steep drop but how did the greens manage to get 23.7% in Bridgend, was it just us, Labour and the Tories?
Yes, except without Tories.
The "anyone but Labour" vote has coalesced around the available candidate, and in May, the Greens were "it":
2004: Lab 70.7 Ind 17.2 Lib Dem 12.2
2008: Lab 82.3 Lib Dem 17.7
2012: Lab 76.3 Green 23.7
i'm impressed that they managed more than the lib dems had 4 years before
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
Posts: 1607
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #189 on:
September 06, 2012, 03:32:14 pm »
On a poor turnout though; the Liberals got 101 votes to the Greens' 85.
Logged
E: -8.26 S: -3.3
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #190 on:
September 06, 2012, 05:38:40 pm »
South Gloucestershire, Dodington
Lib Dem 56.9 (-7.7)
Lab 17.6 (+3.6)
UKIP 15.4 (+15.4)
Con 10.1 (-11.3)
West Lindsey, Nettleham
Con 45.0 (+8.3)
Lib Dem 40.9 (-22.4)
UKIP 14.1 (+14.1)
«
Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 10:19:08 am by ObserverIE
»
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
Posts: 1607
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #191 on:
September 06, 2012, 10:06:45 pm »
Lincolnshire, Nettleham & Saxilby:
Con 43.4% (+9.5)
Lib 25.3% (-35.2)
UKI 11.2% (+11.2)
Lab 10.9% (+5.4)
Ind 8.3% (+8.3)
EDP 0.9% (+0.9)
changes since 2009.
Logged
E: -8.26 S: -3.3
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
Posts: 736
Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -6.70
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #192 on:
September 07, 2012, 02:00:02 am »
The Lincolnshire Lib Dem performances suggest the collapse of a personal vote for the councillor who died, but reading the Holy Word suggests the Lib Dem strength in the area wasn't just down to him; maybe the local organisation has collapsed as well.
Logged
Somewhat reluctant Labour supporter
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #193 on:
September 07, 2012, 10:20:23 am »
Quote from: YL on September 07, 2012, 02:00:02 am
The Lincolnshire Lib Dem performances suggest the collapse of a personal vote for the councillor who died, but reading the Holy Word suggests the Lib Dem strength in the area wasn't just down to him; maybe the local organisation has collapsed as well.
The Tory candidates were local; the Lib Dem candidates weren't, which probably didn't help.
Logged
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #194 on:
September 13, 2012, 04:52:01 pm »
Holy Word for this week
here
.
Breckland, Thetford-Abbey
Lab 49.3 (+27.5)
Con 18.9 (-1.6)
UKIP 17.3 (+17.3)
Lib Dem 14.6 (-3.9)
Burnley, Trinity
Lab 49.3 (-8.7)
Lib Dem 25.6 (-5.8 )
Con 9.6 (+9.6)
BNP 9.5 (-1.1)
UKIP 3.5 (+3.5)
NF 2.6 (+2.6)
Shropshire, Church Stretton and Craven Arms
Con 44.8 (+13.9)
Lib Dem 35.7 (+11.8 )
Lab 19.5 (+7.3)
Charnwood, Loughborough Southfields
Con 48.6 (+11.4)
Lab 46.6 (-3.4)
Lib Dem 4.9 (-7.9)
«
Last Edit: September 14, 2012, 05:30:33 am by ObserverIE
»
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
Posts: 1607
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #195 on:
September 14, 2012, 09:09:25 am »
A mixed picture for Labour, with a fair reason to be happy about the Burnley and Breckland results (the swing Right in the latter is easily accounted for their not contesting last year). The Shropshire and Charnwood results seem disappointing on the face of it, however. The Charnwood - evidently because of Liberal squeeze and small drop in Labour allowed the Tories to gain it for the first time in over a decade (without that small drop, you could write it off as something that couldn't be helped - the Right uniting successfully under the most competitive). The Shropshire, because a Green and Independent absence is usually an opportunity for Labour, but their 7% increase was only a quarter of that absence - with the Liberals and Tories gaining more (although without more results than 2009, it's difficult to judge how much opportunity there really was).
Logged
E: -8.26 S: -3.3
doktorb
YaBB God
Posts: 897
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #196 on:
September 14, 2012, 09:45:21 am »
Very happy to see the Burnley result. Bye bye BNP and *snigger* NF
Logged
My blog -
http://www.liampennington.blogspot.com
Twitter - @doktorb
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 53010
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #197 on:
September 14, 2012, 10:28:07 am »
Regarding Church Stretton & Craven Arms, 20% probably isn't far off the Labour ceiling in most circumstances. Craven Arms is a town with a fair bit of Labour potential, but it's only about a third of the division (and generally the lowest turnout, unless I'm misremembering things), and the rest is a Labour dead zone where the Party struggled to poll much better than 10% in good years
before
the advent of tactical voting in South Shropshire. The Green vote in the division is basically all from Stretton and votes overwhelmingly LibDem in General Elections, while the Independent from last time around was an incumbent Tory district councillor from one of the Stretton wards.
As someone who grew up nearby, I'm just amazed that a Labour candidate managed to poll a fifth of the vote in a division with 'Church Stretton' in its name, especially in the context of a clear Con/Lib battle - shows how things have changed since the formation of the National Government.
Anyways, the LibDems would likely have picked the seat up (national woes are what they are, but Tory run Shropshire Council is not popular; see other by-elections in Shropshire over the past couple of years) had they chosen a better candidate.
Logged
'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
ObserverIE
YaBB God
Posts: 519
Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -1.04
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #198 on:
September 14, 2012, 11:31:43 am »
East Dunbartonshire, Campsie and Kirkintilloch North
Lab 30.8 (+9.0)
SNP 26.9 (+6.6)
Lib Dem 25.0 (+22.6)
Ind 9.9 (-40.9)
Con 5.1 (+0.5)
Green 2.3 (+2.3)
Labour won the seat but no details of subsequent counts available yet.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56586
Re: UK local by-elections 2012
«
Reply #199 on:
September 14, 2012, 11:57:48 am »
Quote from: Comrade Sibboleth on September 14, 2012, 10:28:07 am
a Labour dead zone where the Party struggled to poll much better than 10% in good years
before
the advent of tactical voting in South Shropshire.
Lol.
"Craven Arms" is a town? Sounds like a pub to me.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
[
8
]
9
10
11
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...