Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 24, 2013, 07:16:21 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
Ballot Access Law [debating]
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Ballot Access Law [debating] (Read 987 times)
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14257
Ballot Access Law [debating]
«
on:
January 12, 2012, 05:55:45 pm »
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on November 26, 2011, 11:43:02 am
Ballot Access Law
1. For single seat elections to federal office, each major political party shall receive one ballot spot.
2. It is up to each major political party to decide how to choose the candidate that receives that party's ballot spot.
3. Independents and minor party candidates are eligible for ballot access if they receive at least five signatures from voters eligible to vote in the election the candidate is running in.
Sponsor: Napoleon
Bill Slot: 7 (forum affairs)
«
Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 06:00:04 pm by Bacon King, VP
»
Logged
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #1 on:
January 12, 2012, 06:08:48 pm »
I don't see the point in requiring candidates to get signatures just to appear on the ballot...it seems...undemocratic. I believe all candidates should be given equal opportunities to appear on ballots in Atlasia.
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
TJ in Wisco
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
Posts: 3309
Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: 7.30
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #2 on:
January 12, 2012, 06:37:08 pm »
I'm opposed to the third point as well. Since we have IRV voting it really doesn't matter if independents are on the ballot. It seems to run contrary to the point of having IRV voting.
Logged
"The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected."
-G. K. Chesterton
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16076
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #3 on:
January 12, 2012, 08:41:23 pm »
This would be a mess, and seems completely unnecessary.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 15943
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #4 on:
January 12, 2012, 10:38:57 pm »
I would be more likely to back this if we had a multi-party system, and perhaps it should be brought forth again if the dissolution efforts are successful. But until then, I'm not too big on then. You could easily get around this if someone else in your party had the "nomination" by switching to Independent and then obtaining the signatures.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #5 on:
January 13, 2012, 06:14:53 am »
Motion to table?
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 796
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #6 on:
January 13, 2012, 07:43:19 am »
I think I like the idea behind the bill, which is to force a primary for the parties. However, this bill may make it harder for independents and small parties. People should be able to run. Maybe either make it so that each major party is allowed only one candidate to run under its banner officially (but others can run on their own without having a petition) OR don't do it through a law and have each party adopt its own bylaws to force primaries.
Logged
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #7 on:
January 13, 2012, 09:17:28 am »
Quote from: Junkie on January 13, 2012, 07:43:19 am
I think I like the idea behind the bill, which is to force a primary for the parties. However, this bill may make it harder for independents and small parties. People should be able to run. Maybe either make it so that each major party is allowed only one candidate to run under its banner officially (but others can run on their own without having a petition) OR don't do it through a law and have each party adopt its own bylaws to force primaries.
Yeah, basically this.
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14257
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #8 on:
January 13, 2012, 12:03:58 pm »
Quote from: Senator 20RP12 on January 13, 2012, 06:14:53 am
Motion to table?
Senators, there is now a motion to table this legislation. Please vote aye, nay, or abstain.
Logged
TJ in Wisco
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
Posts: 3309
Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: 7.30
Re: Ballot Access Law (debating)
«
Reply #9 on:
January 13, 2012, 12:06:52 pm »
Nay
I would not support it as-in, but I do think the first two items may be a good idea to implement. I do not see this legislation as irredeemably flawed.
Logged
"The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected."
-G. K. Chesterton
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11584
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #10 on:
January 13, 2012, 12:33:00 pm »
Nay
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
MOPolitico
YaBB God
Posts: 714
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #11 on:
January 13, 2012, 12:37:55 pm »
Nay
Like TJ, I believe that the first two sections are worthy of being passed. I just don't think that independents and minor parties should have to fight to be on the ballot, especially since independent and minor party candidates aren't exactly abundant.
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzdjOkLQw1s
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #12 on:
January 13, 2012, 04:34:43 pm »
But couldn't it be argued, as Junkie said, that the first two provisions could be implemented at the party level?
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 796
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #13 on:
January 13, 2012, 04:43:24 pm »
Nay
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13403
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #14 on:
January 13, 2012, 05:55:51 pm »
nay
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11584
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #15 on:
January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm »
No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14257
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #16 on:
January 13, 2012, 05:59:51 pm »
Motion to table has failed, debate on the bill resumes.
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13403
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [debating]
«
Reply #17 on:
January 13, 2012, 06:05:20 pm »
While I'm fine having a debate on this, it would make more sense to me to wait until the dissolution passes or fails to do too much tinkering with party-related laws.
Logged
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #18 on:
January 13, 2012, 07:27:54 pm »
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Why not?
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8964
Re: Ballot Access Law [debating]
«
Reply #19 on:
January 14, 2012, 03:06:16 am »
Why is this law necessary?
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11584
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #20 on:
January 14, 2012, 05:17:31 am »
Quote from: Senator 20RP12 on January 13, 2012, 07:27:54 pm
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Why not?
How can parties limit a federal ballot?
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 796
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #21 on:
January 14, 2012, 09:35:01 am »
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 14, 2012, 05:17:31 am
Quote from: Senator 20RP12 on January 13, 2012, 07:27:54 pm
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Why not?
Each party can establish a bylaw that states it will only allow one individual to run as its official candidate and then can establish a method be it primary, or whatever, to make that choice.
How can parties limit a federal ballot?
Logged
Diabolical Minds Think Alike
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17505
Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57
Re: Ballot Access Law [VOTE: Motion to Table]
«
Reply #22 on:
January 14, 2012, 11:36:45 am »
Quote from: Junkie on January 14, 2012, 09:35:01 am
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 14, 2012, 05:17:31 am
Quote from: Senator 20RP12 on January 13, 2012, 07:27:54 pm
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Why not?
How can parties limit a federal ballot?
Each party can establish a bylaw that states it will only allow one individual to run as its official candidate and then can establish a method be it primary, or whatever, to make that choice.
Logged
NEY YO HOY MINOY NEYOYOYENOYMEMOY
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11584
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Ballot Access Law [debating]
«
Reply #23 on:
January 14, 2012, 02:40:38 pm »
That would make it optional, why would each party choose to limit itself?
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 796
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: Ballot Access Law [debating]
«
Reply #24 on:
January 14, 2012, 05:21:44 pm »
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 14, 2012, 02:40:38 pm
That would make it optional, why would each party choose to limit itself?
Because the realize that primaries are a good idea OR an at least more likely it is good strategy for a party to have only one candidate or ticket (except of course in at-large senate and regional assembly races)
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...