Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2017, 02:35:11 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Atlas Fantasy Elections
| |-+  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderator: Gustaf)
| | |-+  Ballot Access Law [debating]
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Ballot Access Law [debating]  (Read 2939 times)
Bacon! 🔥
Bacon King
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17837
United States


View Profile
« on: January 12, 2012, 05:55:45 pm »
Ignore

Ballot Access Law

1. For single seat elections to federal office, each major political party shall receive one ballot spot.
2. It is up to each major political party to decide how to choose the candidate that receives that party's ballot spot.
3. Independents and minor party candidates are eligible for ballot access if they receive at least five signatures from voters eligible to vote in the election the candidate is running in.

Sponsor: Napoleon
Bill Slot: 7 (forum affairs)
« Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 06:00:04 pm by Bacon King, VP »Logged

Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2012, 06:08:48 pm »
Ignore

I don't see the point in requiring candidates to get signatures just to appear on the ballot...it seems...undemocratic. I believe all candidates should be given equal opportunities to appear on ballots in Atlasia.
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6764
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 6.96

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2012, 06:37:08 pm »
Ignore

I'm opposed to the third point as well. Since we have IRV voting it really doesn't matter if independents are on the ballot. It seems to run contrary to the point of having IRV voting.
Logged

"A thought sent back in time to the theocracy panic of 2005: If you dislike the religious right, wait till you meet the post-religious right." -Ross Douthat

8 Years and good riddance.
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17554
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2012, 08:41:23 pm »
Ignore

This would be a mess, and seems completely unnecessary.
Logged
tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19325
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2012, 10:38:57 pm »
Ignore

I would be more likely to back this if we had a multi-party system, and perhaps it should be brought forth again if the dissolution efforts are successful. But until then, I'm not too big on then. You could easily get around this if someone else in your party had the "nomination" by switching to Independent and then obtaining the signatures.
Logged
Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2012, 06:14:53 am »
Ignore

Motion to table?
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 798
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2012, 07:43:19 am »
Ignore

I think I like the idea behind the bill, which is to force a primary for the parties.  However, this bill may make it harder for independents and small parties.  People should be able to run.  Maybe either make it so that each major party is allowed only one candidate to run under its banner officially (but others can run on their own without having a petition) OR don't do it through a law and have each party adopt its own bylaws to force primaries.
Logged
Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2012, 09:17:28 am »
Ignore

I think I like the idea behind the bill, which is to force a primary for the parties.  However, this bill may make it harder for independents and small parties.  People should be able to run.  Maybe either make it so that each major party is allowed only one candidate to run under its banner officially (but others can run on their own without having a petition) OR don't do it through a law and have each party adopt its own bylaws to force primaries.

Yeah, basically this.
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
Bacon! 🔥
Bacon King
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17837
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2012, 12:03:58 pm »
Ignore

Motion to table?

Senators, there is now a motion to table this legislation. Please vote aye, nay, or abstain.
Logged

Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6764
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 6.96

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2012, 12:06:52 pm »
Ignore

Nay

I would not support it as-in, but I do think the first two items may be a good idea to implement. I do not see this legislation as irredeemably flawed.
Logged

"A thought sent back in time to the theocracy panic of 2005: If you dislike the religious right, wait till you meet the post-religious right." -Ross Douthat

8 Years and good riddance.
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14946


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2012, 12:33:00 pm »
Ignore

Nay
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Mopsus
MOPolitico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1528
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2012, 12:37:55 pm »
Ignore

Nay

Like TJ, I believe that the first two sections are worthy of being passed. I just don't think that independents and minor parties should have to fight to be on the ballot, especially since independent and minor party candidates aren't exactly abundant.
Logged
Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2012, 04:34:43 pm »
Ignore

But couldn't it be argued, as Junkie said, that the first two provisions could be implemented at the party level?
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 798
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2012, 04:43:24 pm »
Ignore

Nay
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13866
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2012, 05:55:51 pm »
Ignore

nay
Logged

Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14946


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2012, 05:58:33 pm »
Ignore

No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Bacon! 🔥
Bacon King
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17837
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2012, 05:59:51 pm »
Ignore

Motion to table has failed, debate on the bill resumes.
Logged

bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13866
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2012, 06:05:20 pm »
Ignore

While I'm fine having a debate on this, it would make more sense to me to wait until the dissolution passes or fails to do too much tinkering with party-related laws.
Logged

Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2012, 07:27:54 pm »
Ignore

No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.

Why not?
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
modern maverick
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19080


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 14, 2012, 03:06:16 am »
Ignore

Why is this law necessary?
Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14946


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2012, 05:17:31 am »
Ignore

No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.

Why not?

How can parties limit a federal ballot?
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 798
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2012, 09:35:01 am »
Ignore

No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.

Why not?

Each party can establish a bylaw that states it will only allow one individual to run as its official candidate and then can establish a method be it primary, or whatever, to make that choice.

How can parties limit a federal ballot?
Logged
Senator R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26468
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2012, 11:36:45 am »
Ignore

No, 20RP12, it could not be done at the party level.

Why not?

How can parties limit a federal ballot?

Each party can establish a bylaw that states it will only allow one individual to run as its official candidate and then can establish a method be it primary, or whatever, to make that choice.
Logged



You talk clean and bomb hospitals
So I speak with the foulest mouth possible
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14946


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 14, 2012, 02:40:38 pm »
Ignore

That would make it optional, why would each party choose to limit itself?
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 798
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 14, 2012, 05:21:44 pm »
Ignore

That would make it optional, why would each party choose to limit itself?

Because the realize that primaries are a good idea OR an at least more likely it is good strategy for a party to have only one candidate or ticket (except of course in at-large senate and regional assembly races)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines