Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 06:27:29 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating] (Read 945 times)
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14406
OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
on:
January 12, 2012, 06:24:17 pm »
Quote
OSPR Amendment #97495
Section 5, Clause 1 of the Senate Rules, Regulations, and Procedures is amended to read:
1. Any Senator can, during a period of debate, with the support of one other Senator, introduce a motion to table the legislation.
Sponsor: Marokai Blue
Slot: 3
Logged
Pacific Councillor Big Wiggly Style
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17808
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -7.04
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #1 on:
January 12, 2012, 06:26:26 pm »
I support this.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21417
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #2 on:
January 12, 2012, 06:27:59 pm »
Seems like a reasonable change.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
MOP
MOPolitico
YaBB God
Posts: 734
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #3 on:
January 13, 2012, 12:07:35 pm »
I support this proposed amendment. The rights of the minority are important, but one Senator should not be able to single-handedly stall the debate of a bill (Besides, if a motion to table can't even gain two sponsors, what's the likelihood of it passing?).
Logged
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 797
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #4 on:
January 13, 2012, 04:53:44 pm »
I kind of go back and forth on it. Yes, one Senator doing a motion to table can be annoying and slow down a bill. One can argue it our version of the filibuster. While that tactic was shamefully used in the era of civil rights and today, it was also used by Huey Long to champion the poor and Bernie Sanders to protest tax cuts.
I value parlimentary rules that allow for a lone principled dissenter to raise attention to his cause and fight to the very end. It may be annoying, and it may be used against bills I care about, but I have to say it is important to me.
After all that, I think I will not support this amendment.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14406
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #5 on:
January 13, 2012, 06:04:15 pm »
Okay guys, we've just had three motions to table introduced in under 16 hours... passing this would definitely be a good idea.
Logged
Pacific Councillor Big Wiggly Style
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17808
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -7.04
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #6 on:
January 13, 2012, 07:29:13 pm »
Quote from: Bacon King, VP on January 13, 2012, 06:04:15 pm
Okay guys, we've just had three motions to table introduced in under 16 hours... passing this would definitely be a good idea.
I'm pretty confident this will pass
Logged
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 797
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #7 on:
January 13, 2012, 08:33:07 pm »
Quote from: Bacon King, VP on January 13, 2012, 06:04:15 pm
Okay guys, we've just had three motions to table introduced in under 16 hours... passing this would definitely be a good idea.
I don't see this as a bad idea.
Logged
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #8 on:
January 13, 2012, 08:36:26 pm »
I would invoke unanimous consent, to move this along, but I suspect there's one Senator that wouldn't like that.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #9 on:
January 13, 2012, 09:51:45 pm »
Quote from: Bacon King, VP on January 13, 2012, 06:04:15 pm
Okay guys, we've just had three motions to table introduced in under 16 hours... passing this would definitely be a good idea.
I'm certain mine would have been seconded very quickly, FTR.
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #10 on:
January 14, 2012, 01:09:12 am »
Im with Junkie.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 797
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #11 on:
January 14, 2012, 09:45:46 am »
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 14, 2012, 01:09:12 am
Im with Junkie.
I bet that statement probably suprised some people. Thank you for the support. We need to preserve the right of "lone dissent."
Logged
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #12 on:
January 14, 2012, 07:18:07 pm »
If an idea is bad enough to be worth tabling, finding a Senator to second the motion should be trivial. Lone dissent isn't being stopped; vote nay to your heart's content. But don't muck up Senate business by flinging out motions to table legislation for no other reason than you dislike it like a machine gun.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 797
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #13 on:
January 14, 2012, 11:47:51 pm »
Quote from: Mad Marokai, PPT on January 14, 2012, 07:18:07 pm
If an idea is bad enough to be worth tabling, finding a Senator to second the motion should be trivial. Lone dissent isn't being stopped; vote nay to your heart's content. But don't muck up Senate business by flinging out motions to table legislation for no other reason than you dislike it like a machine gun.
Two things. I totally agree that motions to table should not be used just because you have a personality disagreement. That being said, I do not agree that getting a second will be that easy. What if there will a bill that I fundamentally thought was wrong, but the rest of the Senate just did not care or disagreed with me. By being able to slow down the debate by a motion to table I take a stand. We don't have the filibuster. Sometimes voting nay is just not enough.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21417
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #14 on:
January 15, 2012, 08:53:47 pm »
"What if there was something I fundamentally thought was wrong, but the rest...just did not care or disagreed with me."
hmmm, nope, wouldn't know what that is like at all.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [At Final Vote]
«
Reply #15 on:
January 16, 2012, 08:01:00 pm »
The following bill has been up for debate for over three days and has seen no substantial debate for the last day or so,
so I'm opening up a final vote on this resolution. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.
Quote
OSPR Amendment #97495
Section 5, Clause 1 of the Senate Rules, Regulations, and Procedures is amended to read:
1. Any Senator can, during a period of debate, with the support of one other Senator, introduce a motion to table the legislation.
Aye
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Pacific Councillor Big Wiggly Style
20RP12
YaBB God
Posts: 17808
Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -7.04
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #16 on:
January 16, 2012, 08:03:01 pm »
Aye.
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11702
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #17 on:
January 16, 2012, 08:04:19 pm »
Nay
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
MOP
MOPolitico
YaBB God
Posts: 734
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #18 on:
January 16, 2012, 08:31:14 pm »
Aye
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13447
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #19 on:
January 17, 2012, 01:13:47 am »
aye
Logged
Junkie
YaBB God
Posts: 797
Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.35
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #20 on:
January 17, 2012, 07:49:05 am »
Nay
Logged
TJ in Wisco
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
Posts: 3392
Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: 7.30
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #21 on:
January 17, 2012, 11:29:39 am »
Aye
Logged
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #22 on:
January 18, 2012, 08:00:04 pm »
Currently at 5 - 2.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21417
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #23 on:
January 20, 2012, 07:14:05 pm »
Nay. Sometimes we have to put up with nonesense, for a good reason.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
President Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
Posts: 16155
Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39
Re: OSPR Amendment #97495 [debating]
«
Reply #24 on:
January 23, 2012, 08:45:16 pm »
As I'm now operating under the assumption there are 9 Senators, this resolution is currently passing.
Logged
Quote from: 後援会 on August 26, 2012, 12:29:57 am
I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...