Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 02, 2015, 11:24:14 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: dallasfan65)
| | | |-+  Connie Mack III vs. Al Gore 2000
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Who would win?
Mack   -7 (58.3%)
Gore   -5 (41.7%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Connie Mack III vs. Al Gore 2000  (Read 1422 times)
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« on: January 14, 2012, 08:18:29 pm »
Ignore

What it says; who would win in 2000?  Would Florida be less controvercial?  And would the GOP do better in Congressional races?  Post maps and discuss.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2012, 08:30:24 pm »
Ignore

Also, would he have acted on the August memo?  What would that mean for neoconservatism?  Iraq?  Discuss Tongue
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
RodPresident
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 893
Brazil


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2012, 09:56:09 pm »
Ignore

Connie Mack would be less controversial as nominee than Bush, although he would lack Christian Right machine at Iowa and other states...
Logged


Fidelix 28
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 10:32:12 pm »
Ignore

How about Iraq?  Maybe John Engler for regional balance?
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2012, 08:45:27 pm »
Ignore

Bump bump bump it up
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2012, 01:34:08 am »
Ignore

And note the question is not "who would you vote for" its "who would win"; to the four of you who thought the likable Connie Mack, who wouldn't choose a raging neocon, say this guy:



as his running mate, wouldn't do better than this guy:



in an election, no offense, but I don't think you know American politics.  Although I must say I like that pic.  I'll use it as my sig, not that anyone cares Wink
« Last Edit: January 29, 2012, 01:53:54 am by Jerseyrules »Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11839
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2012, 02:16:57 pm »
Ignore



Gore/Kerry map v Connie Mack/Lamar Alexander
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4919
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2012, 07:27:46 pm »
Ignore



Neither man is exactly charismatic in the scenario but I think Gore would have ran a better campaign and could have possibly used Clinton's help more.  Gore would have won anyway in the scenario, the Congressional races would be a little better for the Republicans.
Logged

If I had a chance I'd ask the world to dance..
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2012, 08:20:01 pm »
Ignore

IMO, this is reasonable:

Connie Mack III / John Engler vs. Al Gore / Joe Lieberman:



* I honestly don't think he'd change his strategy much, albeit maybe using Clinton a bit more out of desparation.  But it shouldn't have been a huge difference to his strategy, ex. Anti-Lewinski gate, etc.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2012, 08:22:30 pm by Jerseyrules »Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines